Metallic wastewater treatment by sulfate reduction using anaerobic rotating biological contactor reactor under high metal loading conditions

Abstract

An-RBC reactor is highly suited to treat metallic wastewater.

Metal removal is due to sulfide precipitation via sulfate reduction by SRB.

Cu(II) removal was the best among the different heavy metals.

Maximum metal removal is achieved at low metal loading condition.

Metal removal matched well with the solubility product values of respective metal sulfide salts.

This study was aimed at investigating the performance of anaerobic rotating biological contactor reactor treating synthetic wastewater containing a mixture of heavy metals under sulfate reducing condition. Statistically valid factorial design of experiments was carried out to understand the dynamics of metal removal using this bioreactor system. Copper removal was maximum (>98%), followed by other heavy metals at their respective low inlet concentrations. Metal loading rates less than 3.7 mg/L∙h in case of Cu(II); less than 1.69 mg/L∙h for Ni(II), Pb(II), Zn(II), Fe(III) and Cd(II) are favorable to the performance of the An-RBC reactor. Removal efficiency of the heavy metals from mixture depended on the metal species and their inlet loading concentrations. Analysis of metal precipitates formed in the sulfidogenic bioreactor by field emission scanning electron microscopy along with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (FESEM-EDX) confirmed metal sulfide precipitation by SRB. All these results clearly revealed that the attached growth biofilm bioreactor is well suited for heavy metal removal from complex mixture.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Factorial design analysis / sulfate reducing bacteria / multi-metal solution / heavy metal removal / anaerobic rotating biological contactor reactor / high metal loading.

References

[1] American Public Health Association (APHA) (2005). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 21st ed. American Water Works Association (AWWA) & Water Environment Federation (WEF), Washington D.C.

[2] Bai H J, Zhang Z M, Yang G E, Li B Z (2008). Bioremediation of cadmium by growing Rhodobacter sphaeroides: Kinetic characteristic and mechanism studies. Bioresource Technology, 99(16): 7716–7722

[3] Brahmacharimayum B, Ghosh P K (2014). Sulfate bioreduction and elemental sulfur formation in a packed bed reactor. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 2(3): 1287–1293

[4] Cao J, Li Y, Zhang G, Yang C, Cao X (2013). Effect of Fe(III) on the biotreatment of bioleaching solutions using sulfate-reducing bacteria. International Journal of Mineral Processing, 125: 27–33

[5] Chen C Y, Lin K C, Yang D T (1997). Comparison of the relative toxicity relationships based on batch and continuous algal toxicity tests. Chemosphere, 35(9): 1959–1965

[6] Cord-Ruwisch R (1985). A quick method for the determination of dissolved and precipitated sulfides in cultures of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 4(1): 33–36

[7] Dev S, Roy S, Bhattacharya J (2016). Understanding the performance of sulfate reducing bacteria based packed bed reactor by growth kinetics study and microbial profiling. Journal of Environmental Management, 177: 101–110

[8] Dev S, Roy S, Bhattacharya J (2017). Optimization of the operation of packed bed bioreactor to improve the sulfate and metal removal from acid mine drainage. Journal of Environmental Management, 200: 135–144

[9] Gikas P (2007). Kinetic responses of activated sludge to individual and joint nickel (Ni(II)) and cobalt (Co(II)): An isobolographic approach. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 143(1-2): 246–256

[10] Guo J, Kang Y, Feng Y (2017). Bioassessment of heavy metal toxicity and enhancement of heavy metal removal by sulfate-reducing bacteria in the presence of zero valent iron. Journal of Environmental Management, 203(Pt 1): 278–285

[11] Hill J W, Petrucci R H, McCreary T W, Perry S S (2005). General Chemistry. 4th Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.

[12] Hu Z, Chandran K, Grasso D, Smets B F (2004). Comparison of nitrification inhibition by metals in batch and continuous flow reactors. Water Research, 38(18): 3949–3959

[13] Jiménez-Rodríguez A M, Durán-Barrantes M M, Borja R, Sánchez E, Colmenarejo M F, Raposo F (2009). Heavy metals removal from acid mine drainage water using biogenic hydrogen sulphide and effluent from anaerobic treatment: Effect of pH. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 165(1-3): 759–765

[14] Jin S, Drever J I, Colberg P J (2007). Effects of copper on sulfate reduction in bacterial consortia enriched from metal-contaminated and uncontaminated sediments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 26(2): 225–230

[15] Kaksonen A H, Puhakka J A (2007). Sulfate reduction based bioprocesses for the treatment of acid mine drainage and the recovery of metals. Engineering in Life Sciences, 7(6): 541–564

[16] Kieu H T Q, Müller E, Horn H (2011). Heavy metal removal in anaerobic semi-continuous stirred tank reactors by a consortium of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Water Research, 45(13): 3863–3870

[17] Kiran M G, Pakshirajan K, Das G (2016). Heavy metal removal using sulfate reducing biomass obtained from a lab scale upflow anaerobic packed bed reactor. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 142(9): C4015010

[18] Kiran M G, Pakshirajan K, Das G (2017a). A new application of anaerobic rotating biological contactor reactor for heavy metal removal under sulfate reducing condition. Chemical Engineering Journal, 321: 67–75

[19] Kiran M G, Pakshirajan K, Das G (2017b). Heavy metal removal from multicomponent system by sulfate reducing bacteria: Mechanism and cell surface characterization. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 324(Part A): 62–70

[20] Lens P N L, van den Bosch M C, Hulshoff Pol L W, Lettinga G (1998). Effect of staging on volatile fatty acid degradation in a sulfidogenic granular sludge reactor. Water Research, 32(4): 1178–1192

[21] Madamba P S, Liboon F A (2001). Optimization of the vacuum dehydration of celery (Apium graveolens) using the response surface methodology. Drying Technology, 19(3-4): 611–626

[22] Min X, Chai L, Zhang C, Takasaki Y, Okura T (2008). Control of metal toxicity, effluent COD and regeneration of gel beads by immobilized sulfate-reducing bacteria. Chemosphere, 72(7): 1086–1091

[23] Montgomery D C (2004). Design and analysis of experiments, 7th ed. New York: Wiley

[24] Nagpal S, Chuichulcherm S, Livingston A, Peeva L (2000). Ethanol utilization by sulfate-reducing bacteria: an experimental and modeling study. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 70(5): 533–543

[25] Omil F, Lens P, Hulshoff Pol L, Lettinga G (1996). Effect of upward velocity and sulphide concentration on volatile fatty acid degradation in a sulphidogenic granular sludge reactor. Process Biochemistry, 31(7): 699–710

[26] Pakshirajan K, Kheria S (2012). Continuous treatment of coloured industry wastewater using immobilized Phanerochaete chrysosporium in a rotating biological contactor reactor. Journal of Environmental Management, 101: 118–123

[27] Postgate J R (1984). The Sulphate-reducing Bacteria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 107–152

[28] Rinzema A, Lettinga G (1998). Anaerobic treatment of sulfate containing wastewater. In: Biotreatment Systems, 3: (Wise, DL, Ed). Boca Raton: CRC Press, Inc., 65–109

[29] Robinson-Lora M A, Brennan R A (2009). Efficient metal removal and neutralization of acid mine drainage by crab-shell chitin under batch and continuous-flow conditions. Bioresource Technology, 100(21): 5063–5071

[30] Saifullah, Meers E, Qadir M, de Caritat P, Tack F M, Du Laing G, Zia M H (2009). EDTA-assisted Pb phytoextraction. Chemosphere, 74: 1279–1291

[31] Sema S S, Gikas P, James G M, Brent M P, Timothy R G (2012). Comparison of single and joint effects of Zn and Cu in continuous flow and batch reactors. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 87(3): 374–380

[32] Sen M, Dastidar M G, Roy Choudhury P K (2007). Biological removal of Cr(VI) using Fusarium solani in batch and continuous modes of operation. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 41(1-2): 51–56

[33] Teclu D, Tivchev G, Laing M, Wallis M (2009). Determination of the elemental composition of molasses and its suitability as carbon source for growth of sulphate-reducing bacteria. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 161(2-3): 1157–1165

[34] Utgikar V P, Chaudhary N, Koeniger A, Tabak H H, Haines J R, Govind R (2004). Toxicity of metals and metal mixtures: Analysis of concentration and time dependence for zinc and copper. Water Research, 38(17): 3651–3658

[35] Velasco A, Ramírez M, Volke-Sepúlveda T, González-Sánchez A, Revah S (2008). Evaluation of feed COD/sulfate ratio as a control criterion for the biological hydrogen sulfide production and lead precipitation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 151(2-3): 407–413

[36] Villa-Gomez D K, Pakshirajan K, Maestro R, Mushi S, Lens P N L (2015). Effect of process variables on the sulfate reduction process in bioreactors treating metal-containing wastewaters: Factorial design and response surface analyses. Biodegradation, 26(4): 299–311

[37] Wang W, Lampi M A, Huang X D, Gerhardt K, Dixon D G, Greenberg B M (2009). Assessment of mixture toxicity of copper, cadmium, and phenanthrenequinone to the marine bacterium Vibrio fischeri. Environmental Toxicology, 24(2): 166–177

[38] Widdel F (1998). Microbiology and ecology of sulfate-and sulfur-reducing bacteria. In: Zehnder A, ed. Biology of Anaerobic Microorganisms. New York: Wiley

[39] Zhang M, Wang H (2016). Preparation of immobilized sulfate reducing bacteria (SRB) granules for effective bioremediation of acid mine drainage and bacterial community analysis. Minerals Engineering, 92: 63–71

[40] Zhang M, Wang H, Han X (2016). Preparation of metal-resistant immobilized sulfate reducing bacteria beads for acid mine drainage treatment. Chemosphere, 154: 215–223

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature