Distribution of phytoplankton community and its influence factors in an urban river network, East China

Ling Sun, Hui Wang, Yuanqing Kan, Shiliang Wang

PDF(462 KB)
PDF(462 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (6) : 13. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-018-1062-7
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Distribution of phytoplankton community and its influence factors in an urban river network, East China

Author information +
History +

Highlights

Effects of urban river conditions on phytoplankton community were investigated.

Nitrate utilization and hydrodynamic condition affected phytoplankton distribution.

A winter bloom was induced by abundant ammonia, total phosphorus and organic matters.

The diatoms and euglenoids dominated in an urban beheaded river ecosystem.

Abstract

To reveal the distribution characteristics of phytoplankton and the main influence factors under different conditions in the urban rivers, the investigations were conducted during autumn and winter 2014 in Changzhou City, East China. 178 taxa of phytoplankton belonging to 28 functional assemblages were identified. In autumn, the phytoplankton community compositions have high similarity for enhanced hydrological connectivity. The chlorophytes and diatoms (prevailing functional groups C, F, J, P), together with euglenoids (W1), showed high proportions of biomass in the main rivers and connected rivers. It was related to the well mixed eutrophic conditions. The phytoplankton community exhibited spatiotemporal heterogeneity in winter. Affected by the low water level and temperature, the free-living phytoflagellates (X2) replaced groups F and J in the main rivers. Phytoplankton productivity was the highest in the Tongji River. Chlorophytes Dictyosphaerium ehrenbergianum and Chlamydobotrys stellata had an overwhelming superiority during the winter bloom. They were significantly correlated with ammonium, total phosphorus and biochemical oxygen demand. Affected by tail water supply, the diatoms (MP) and euglenoids (W1) dominated in a beheaded river. The multivariate analyses based on the phytoplankton functional groups helped to evaluate the relationships and variations between the urban rivers. The redundancy analysis (RDA) results showed that nitrate nitrogen, water temperature, total nitrogen and total suspended solids were the main influence factors on the phytoplankton community. Except MP, the prevailing groups all showed significant negative correlations with nitrate nitrogen. Availability and utilization of dissolved inorganic nitrogen and hydrodynamic conditions affected the phytoplankton distribution.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Phytoplankton composition / Spatiotemporal distribution / Functional groups / Nitrate nitrogen / Winter bloom

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ling Sun, Hui Wang, Yuanqing Kan, Shiliang Wang. Distribution of phytoplankton community and its influence factors in an urban river network, East China. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(6): 13 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-018-1062-7

References

[1]
Abonyi A, Leitão M, Stanković I, Borics G, Várbíró G, Padisák J (2014). A large river (River Loire, France) survey to compare phytoplankton functional approaches: Do they display river zones in similar ways? Ecological Indicators, 46(6): 11–22
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
APHA AWWA, WEF (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC
[3]
Arvola L, Tulonen T (1998). Effects of allochthonous dissolved organic matter and inorganic nutrients on the growth of bacteria and algae from a highly humic lake. Environment International, 24(5-6): 509–520
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Borics G, Görgényi J, Grigorszky I, László-Nagy Z, Tóthmérész B, Krasznai E, Várbíró G (2014). The role of phytoplankton diversity metrics in shallow lake and river quality assessment. Ecological Indicators, 45(1): 28–36
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Chen J C, Meng S L, Hu G D, Qu J H, Wu W, Fan L M, Song C (2010). Water quality evaluation by phytoplankton community structure indices and physical-chemical indices in the lower reach of the Yangtze River in autumn. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 19(Suppl 2): 34–39 (in Chinese)
[6]
Chen L L, Zou H, Zhuang Y, Zhang H J (2014). Phytoplankton community characteristics and ecological assessement of water quality in Xiaoxi Port. Research of Environmental Sciences, 27(9): 1016–1023 (in Chinese)
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Conforti V, Alberghina J, Urda E G (1995). Structural changes and dynamics of the phytoplankton along a highly polluted lowland river of Argentina. Journal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health, 4(1): 59–75
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Demeter S, Janda T, Kovács L, Mende D, Wiessner W (1995). Effects of in vivo CO2-depletion on electron transport and photoinhibition in the green algae, Chlamydobotrys stellata and Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1229(2): 166–174
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Devercelli M, O’Farrell I (2013). Factors affecting the structure and maintenance of phytoplankton functional groups in a nutrient rich lowland river. Limnologica, 43(2): 67–78
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Echevin V, Aumont O, Ledesma J, Flores G (2008). The seasonal cycle of surface chlorophyll in the Peruvian upwelling system: A modelling Study. Progress in Oceanography, 79(2-4): 167–176
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Furnas M J (1983). Nitrogen dynamics in lower Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island. I. Uptake by size-fractionated phytoplankton populations. Journal of Plankton Research, 5(5): 657–676
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Hilligsøe K M, Richardson K, Bendtsen J, Sørensen L L, Nielsen T G, Lyngsgaard M M (2011). Linking phytoplankton community size composition with temperature, plankton food web structure and sea-air CO2 flux. Deep-sea Research. Part I, Oceanographic Research Papers, 58(8): 826–838
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Hu H J, Wei Y X (2006). The freshwater algae of China—Systematics, taxonomy and ecology. Beijing: Science Press(in Chinese)
[14]
Huang X F, Cheng W M, Cai Q M (1999). Survey, observation and analysis of lake ecology. Beijing: China Standards Press(in Chinese)
[15]
Jiang Z, Liu J, Chen J, Chen Q, Yan X, Xuan J, Zeng J (2014). Responses of summer phytoplankton community to drastic environmental changes in the Changjiang (Yangtze River) estuary during the past 50 years. Water Research, 54(5): 1–11
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[16]
Kovács L, Wiessner W, Kis M, Nagy F, Mende D, Demeter S (2000). Short- and long-term redox regulation of photosynthetic light energy distribution and photosystem stoichiometry by acetate metabolism in the green alga, Chlamydobotrys stellata. Photosynthesis Research, 65(3): 231–247
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[17]
Kruk C, Huszar V L M, Peeters E T H M, Bonilla S, Costa L, Lürling M, Reynolds C S, Scheffer M (2010). A morphological classification capturing functional variation in phytoplankton. Freshwater Biology, 55(3): 614–627
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Liang X Q, Nie Z Y, He M M, Guo R, Zhu C Y, Chen Y X, Stephan K (2013). Application of 15N- 18O double stable isotope tracer technique in an agricultural nonpoint polluted river of the Yangtze Delta Region. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 20(10): 6972–6979
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[19]
Lugoli F, Garmendia M, Lehtinen S, Kauppila P, Moncheva S, Revilla M, Roselli L, Slabakova N, Valencia V, Dromph K M, Basset A (2012). Application of a new multi-metric phytoplankton index to the assessment of ecological status in marine and transitional waters. Ecological Indicators, 23(4): 338–355
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Lv J, Wu H J, Chen M Q (2011). Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus on phytoplankton composition and biomass in 15 subtropical, urban shallow lakes in Wuhan, China. Limnologica, 41(1): 48–56
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Maguer J, L’Helguen S, Waeles M, Morin P, Riso R, Caradec J (2009). Size-fractionated phytoplankton biomass and nitrogen uptake in response to high nutrient load in the North Biscay Bay in spring. Continental Shelf Research, 29(8): 1103–1110
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Ning D L, Huang Y, Pan R S, Wang F Y, Wang H (2014). Effect of eco-remediation using planted floating bed system on nutrients and heavy metals in urban river water and sediment: A field study in China. Science of the Total Environmental, 485–486(1): 596–603
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Padisák J, Crossetti L O, Naselli-Flores L (2009). Use and misuse in the application of the phytoplankton functional classification: A critical review with updates. Hydrobiologia, 621(1): 1–19
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Palmer C M (1969). A composite rating of algae tolerating organic pollution. Journal of Phycology, 5(1): 78–82
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[25]
Reynolds C S, Descy J P (1996). The production, biomass and structure of phytoplankton in large rivers. Archiv Für Hydrobiologie Supplement, 113(1-4): 161–187
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Reynolds C S, Huszar V, Kruk C, Naselli-Flores L, Melo S (2002). Towards a functional classification of the freshwater phytoplankton. Journal of Plankton Research, 24(5): 417–428
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Rodrigues L C, Pivato B M, Vieira L C G, Bovo-Scomparin V M, Bortolini J C, Pineda A, Train S (2018). Use of phytoplankton functional groups as a model of spatial and temporal patterns in reservoirs: A case study in a reservoir of central Brazil. Hydrobiologia, 805(1): 147–161
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Salmaso N, Zignin A (2010). At the extreme of physical gradients: phytoplankton in highly flushed, large rivers. Hydrobiologia, 639(1): 21–36
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Smith V H (2003). Eutrophication of freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems: A global problem. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 10(2): 126–139
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[30]
Song DJ, Li ZH, Hua C, Yu WY, Hua L, Zhang Y, Huang C, Yu J (2009). Community structure of phytoplankton in Zhenjiang Branch, Yangtze River. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 37(12): 48–50, 53 (in Chinese)
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Tian Y Q, Huang B Q, Yu C C, Chen N W, Hong H S (2014). Dynamics of phytoplankton communities in the Jiangdong Reservoir of Jiulong River, Fujian, South China. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 32(2): 255–265
CrossRef Google scholar
[32]
Xiao L J, Wang T, Hu R, Han B P, Wang S, Qian X, Padisák J (2011). Succession of phytoplankton functional groups regulated by monsoonal hydrology in a large canyon-shaped reservoir. Water Research, 45(16): 5099–5109
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[33]
Yang J, Lv H, Yang J, Liu L M, Yu X Q, Chen H H (2016). Decline in water level boosts cyanobacteria dominance in subtropical reservoirs. Science of the Total Environment, 557–558: 445–452
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Zhang J, Wei Z, Jia H F, Huang X (2017). Factors influencing water quality indices in a typical urban river originated with reclaimed water. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 11(4): 73–82
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Zhu K, Bi Y, Hu Z (2013). Responses of phytoplankton functional groups to the hydrologic regime in the Daning River, a tributary of Three Gorges Reservoir, China. Science of the Total Environment, 450-451(0): 169–177
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[36]
Zhu W, Wan L, Zhao L (2010). Effect of nutrient level on phytoplankton community structure in different water bodies. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 22(1): 32–39
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the National Key Research Project on Water Environmental Pollution Control in China (No. 2017ZX07202002) and the Foundation of Tianjin Key Laboratory of Animal and Plant Resistance, Tianjin Normal University (No. 52XS1209). We are grateful to Dongjiong Xu, Qiao Chen and Engineer Xie of Changzhou Environmental Monitoring Center for their help with sampling and water quality analyses. Finally, we thank Professor Yuanyi Zhuang of Nankai University and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2018 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(462 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/