Comparison of membrane fouling in ultrafiltration of down-flow and up-flow biological activated carbon effluents

Abstract

The UF membrane fouling by down- and up-flow BAC effluents were compared.

Up-flow BAC effluent fouled the membrane faster than down-flow BAC effluent.

The combined effects dominated irreversible fouling.

The extent of fouling exacerbated by inorganic particles was higher.

The TMP, permeate flux, and normalized membrane flux during 21 days of UF of DBAC and UBAC effluents.

Fouling during ultrafiltration of down- and up-flow biological activated carbon effluents was investigated to determine the roles of polysaccharides, proteins, and inorganic particles in ultrafiltration membrane fouling. During ultrafiltration of down- flow biological activated carbon effluent, the trans-membrane pressure was≤26 kPa and the permeate flux was steady at 46.7 L∙m⁻²∙h⁻¹. However, during ultrafiltration of up-flow biological activated carbon effluent, the highest trans-membrane pressure was almost 40 kPa and the permeate flux continuously decreased to 30 L∙m⁻²∙h⁻¹. At the end of the filtration period, the normalized membrane fluxes were 0.88 and 0.62 for down- and up-flow biological activated carbon effluents, respectively. The membrane removed the turbidity and polysaccharides content by 47.4% and 30.2% in down- flow biological activated effluent and 82.5% and 22.4% in up-flow biological activated carbon effluent, respectively, but retained few proteins. The retention of polysaccharides was higher on the membrane that filtered the down- flow biological activated effluent compared with that on the membrane that filtered the up-flow biological activated carbon effluent. The polysaccharides on the membranes fouled by up-flow biological activated carbon and down- flow biological activated effluents were spread continuously and clustered, respectively. These demonstrated that the up-flow biological activated carbon effluent fouled the membrane faster. Membrane fouling was associated with a portion of the polysaccharides (not the proteins) and inorganic particles in the feed water. When there was little difference in the polysaccharide concentrations between the feed waters, the fouling extent was exacerbated more by inorganic particles than by polysaccharides.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Ultrafiltration / Membrane fouling / Down-flow biological activated carbon / Up-flow biological activated carbon / Particles / Polysaccharide

References

[1] Ao L, Liu W, Zhao L, Wang X (2016). Membrane fouling in ultrafiltration of natural water after pretreatment to different extents. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 43(5): 234–243

[2] Boudaud N, Machinal C, David F, Fréval-Le Bourdonnec A, Jossent J, Bakanga F, Arnal C, Jaffrezic M P, Oberti S, Gantzer C (2012). Removal of MS2, Qb and GA bacteriophages during drinking water treatment at pilot scale. Water Research, 46(8): 2651–2664

[3] Carroll T, King S, Gray S R, Bolto B A, Booker N A (2000). The fouling of microfiltration membranes by NOM after coagulation treatment. Water Research, 34(11): 2861–2868

[4] Chang H, Liu B, Liang H, Yu H, Shao S, Li G (2017). Effect of filtration mode and backwash water on hydraulically irreversible fouling of ultrafiltration membrane. Chemosphere, 179: 254–264

[5] Chen M Y, Lee D J, Yang Z, Peng X F, Lai J Y (2006). Fluorecent staining for study of extracellular polymeric substances in membrane biofouling layers. Environmental Science & Technology, 40(21): 6642–6646

[6] Chen W, Westerhoff P, Leenheer J A, Booksh K (2003). Fluorescence excitation-emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter. Environmental Science & Technology, 37(24): 5701–5710

[7] Chen X D, Wang Z, Liu D Y, Xiao K, Guan J, Xie Y F, Wang X M, Waite T D (2018). Role of adsorption in combined membrane fouling by biopolymers coexisting with inorganic particles. Chemosphere, 191: 226–234

[8] Cho J W, Amy G, Pellegrino J, Yoon Y M (1998). Characterization of clean and natural organic matter (NOM) fouled NF and UF membranes, and foulants characterization. Desalination, 118(1–3): 101–108

[9] Escobar I C, Hoek E M, Gabelich C J, DiGiano F A, Le Gouellec Y A, Berube P, Howe K J, Allen J, Atasi K Z, Benjamin M M, Brandhuber P J, Brant J, Chang Y J, Chapman M, Childress A, Conlon W J, Cooke T H, Crossley I A, Crozes G F, Huck P M, Kommineni S N, Jacangelo J G, Karimi A A, Kim J H, Lawler D F, Li Q L, Schideman L C, Sethi S, Tobiason J E, Tseng T, Veerapanemi S, Zander A K (2005). Committee Report: Recent advances and research needs in membrane fouling. Journal- American Water Works Association, 97(8): 79–89

[10] Geismar N, Berube P R, Barbeau B (2012). Variability and limits of the unified membrane fouling index: application to the reduction of low-pressure membrane fouling by ozonation and biofiltration. Desalination and Water Treatment, 43(1–3): 91–101

[11] Grabińska-Loniewska A, Perchuć M, Korniłowicz-Kowalska T (2004). Biocenosis of BAC(F)s used for groundwater treatment. Water Research, 38(7): 1695–1706

[12] Gray S R, Dow N, Orbell J D, Tran T, Bolto B A (2011). The significance of interactions between organic compounds on low pressure membrane fouling. Water Science and Technology, 64(3): 632–639

[13] Guo J, Hu J, Tao Y, Zhu J, Zhang X (2014). Effect of ozone on the performance of a hybrid ceramic membrane-biological activated carbon process. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 26(4): 783–791

[14] Hagen K (1998). Removal of particles, bacteria and parasites with ultrafiltration for drinking water treatment. Desalination, 1–3(119): 85–91

[15] Hallé C, Huck P M, Peldszus S, Haberkamp J, Jekel M (2009). Assessing the performance of biological filtration as pretreatment to low pressure membranes for drinking water. Environmental Science & Technology, 43(10): 3878–3884

[16] Han L, Liu W, Chen M, Zhang M, Liu S, Sun R, Fei X (2013). Comparison of NOM removal and microbial properties in up-flow/down-flow BAC filter. Water Research, 47(14): 4861–4868

[17] Howe K J, Clark M M (2002). Fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes by natural waters. Environmental Science & Technology, 36(16): 3571–3576

[18] Huang G, Meng F, Zheng X, Wang Y, Wang Z, Liu H, Jekel M (2011). Biodegradation behavior of natural organic matter (NOM) in a biological aerated filter (BAF) as a pretreatment for ultrafiltration (UF) of river water. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 90(5): 1795–1803

[19] Jarusutthirak C, Amy G (2006). Role of soluble microbial products (SMP) in membrane fouling and flux decline. Environmental Science & Technology, 40(3): 969–974

[20] Jermann D, Pronk W, Boller M (2008). Mutual influences between natural organic matter and inorganic particles and their combined effect on ultrafiltration membrane fouling. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(24): 9129–9136

[21] Katsoufidou I S, Sioutopoulos D C, Yiantsios S G, Karabelas A J (2010). UF membrane fouling by mixtures of humic acids and sodium alginate Fouling mechanisms and reversibility. Desalination, 264(3 3SI): 220–227

[22] Katsoufidou K, Yiantsios S G, Karabelas A J (2008). An experimental study of UF membrane fouling by humic acid and sodium alginate solutions: The effect of backwashing on flux recovery. Desalination, 220(1–3): 214–227

[23] Kennedy M D, Chun H K, Yangali V, Heijman B, Schippers J C (2005). Natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of ultrafiltration membranes: fractionation of NOM in surface water and characterisation by LC-OCD. Desalination, 178(1–3): 73–83

[24] Kennedy M D, Kamanyi J, Heijman B G J, Amy G (2008). Colloidal organic matter fouling of UF membranes: role of NOM composition & size. Desalination, 220(1–3): 200–213

[25] Kim W H, Nishijima W, Shoto E, Okada M (1997). Pilot plant study on ozonation and biological activated carbon process for drinking water treatment. Water Science and Technology, 35(8): 21–28

[26] Kimura K, Hane Y, Watanabe Y, Amy G, Ohkuma N (2004). Irreversible membrane fouling during ultrafiltration of surface water. Water Research, 38(14-15): 3431–3441

[27] Kimura K, Tanaka K, Watanabe Y (2014). Microfiltration of different surface waters with/without coagulation: clear correlations between membrane fouling and hydrophilic biopolymers. Water Research, 49(2): 434–443

[28] Kong L, Kadokami K, Duong H T, Chau H T C (2016). Screening of 1300 organic micro-pollutants in groundwater from Beijing and Tianjin, North China. Chemosphere, 165: 221–230

[29] Law C, Li X Y, Li Q L (2010). The Combined Colloid-Organic Fouling on Nanofiltration Membrane for Wastewater Treatment and Reuse. Separation Science and Technology, 45(7): 935–940

[30] Lee N, Amy G, Croué J P (2006). Low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) fouling associated with allochthonous versus autochthonous natural organic matter. Water Research, 40(12): 2357–2368

[31] Lin T, Chen W, Wang L (2010). Particle properties in granular activated carbon filter during drinking water treatment. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 22(5): 681–688

[32] Munla L, Peldszus S, Huck P M (2012). Reversible and irreversible fouling of ultrafiltration ceramic membranes by model solutions. Journal- American Water Works Association, 104(10): 47–48

[33] Nakatsuka S, Nakate I, Miyano T (1996). Drinking water treatment by using ultrafiltration hollow fiber membranes. Desalination, 106(1–3): 55–61

[34] Peiris R H, Budman H, Moresoli C, Legge R L (2010). Understanding fouling behaviour of ultrafiltration membrane processes and natural water using principal component analysis of fluorescence excitation-emission matrices. Journal of Membrane Science, 357(1–2): 62–72

[35] Shao J, Hou J, Song H (2011). Comparison of humic acid rejection and flux decline during filtration with negatively charged and uncharged ultrafiltration membranes. Water Research, 45(2): 473–482

[36] Subhi N, Verliefde A, Chen V, Le-Clech P (2012). Assessment of physicochemical interactions in hollow fibre ultrafiltration membrane by contact angle analysis. Journal of Membrane Science, 403(6): 32–40

[37] Tian J Y, Ernst M, Cui F Y, Jekel M (2013). Effect of different cations on UF membrane fouling by NOM fractions. Chemical Engineering Journal, 223(5): 547–555

[38] Wang J, Wang X C (2006). Ultrafiltration with in-line coagulation for the removal of natural humic acid and membrane fouling mechanism. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 18(5): 880–884

[39] Wang Y, Tang K W, Xu Z X, Tang Y, Liu H F (2009). Water quality assessment of surface drinking water sources in cities and towns of China. Water Resource Protection, 25(2): 1–4, 68

[40] Xiao K, Sun J, Shen Y, Liang S, Liang P, Wang X M, Huang X (2016). Fluorescence properties of dissolved organic matter as a function of hydrophobicity and molecular weight: Case studies from two membrane bioreactors and an oxidation ditch. RSC Advances, 6(29): 24050–24059

[41] Xiao P, Xiao F, Wang D S, Qin T, He S P (2012). Investigation of organic foulants behavior on hollow-fiber UF membranes in a drinking water treatment plant. Separation and Purification Technology, 95(1): 109–117

[42] Yamamura H, Okimoto K, Kimura K, Watanabe Y (2007). Influence of calcium on the evolution of irreversible fouling in microfiltration/ultrafiltration membranes. Journal of Water Supply: Research & Technology- Aqua, 56(6–7): 425–434

[43] Yang J S, Yuan D X, Weng T P (2010). Pilot study of drinking water treatment with GAC, O-3/BAC and membrane processes in Kinmen Island, Taiwan. Desalination, 263(1–3): 271–278

[44] Zheng L J, Gao H J, Song Y H, Han L, Lu C J (2016). Comprehensive evaluation and analysis of surface water quality for typical cities of China. Huanjing Gongcheng Jishu Xuebao, 6(3): 252–258

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature