How aerosol direct effects influence the source contributions to PM_2.5 concentrations over Southern Hebei, China in severe winter haze episodes

Abstract

The aerosol direct effects result in a 3%–9% increase in PM_2.5 concentrations over Southern Hebei.

These impacts are substantially different under different PM_2.5 loadings.

Industrial and domestic contributions will be underestimated if ignoring the feedbacks.

Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei area is the most air polluted region in China and the three neighborhood southern Hebei cities, Shijiazhuang, Xingtai, and Handan, are listed in the top ten polluted cities with severe PM_2.5 pollution. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the impacts of aerosol direct effects on air quality over the southern Hebei cities, as well as the impacts when considering those effects on source apportionment using three dimensional air quality models. The WRF/Chem model was applied over the East Asia and northern China at 36 and 12 km horizontal grid resolutions, respectively, for the period of January 2013, with two sets of simulations with or without aerosol-meteorology feedbacks. The source contributions of power plants, industrial, domestic, transportation, and agriculture are evaluated using the Brute-Force Method (BFM) under the two simulation configurations. Our results indicate that, although the increases in PM_2.5 concentrations due to those effects over the three southern Hebei cities are only 3%–9% on montly average, they are much more significant under high PM_2.5 loadings (~50 μg·m⁻³ when PM_2.5 concentrations are higher than 400 μg m⁻³). When considering the aerosol feedbacks, the contributions of industrial and domestic sources assessed using the BFM will obviously increase (e.g., from 30%–34% to 32%–37% for industrial), especially under high PM_2.5 loadings (e.g., from 36%–44% to 43%–47% for domestic when PM_2.5>400 μg·m⁻³). Our results imply that the aerosol direct effects should not be ignored during severe pollution episodes, especially in short-term source apportionment using the BFM.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Aerosol direct effect / PM _2.5 / Southern Hebei / WRF/Chem / Haze

References

[1] MEP. China National Ambient Air Quality Standards, GB3095–2012. Beijing: MEP, 2012 (in Chinese)

[2] MEP. 2014 Report on the State of the Environment in China. Beijing: MEP, 2015 (in Chinese)

[3] MEP. 2015 Report on the State of the Environment in China. Beijing: MEP, 2016 (in Chinese)

[4] MEP. 2013 Report on the State of the Environment in China. Beijing: MEP, 2014

[5] Wang L T, Wei Z, Yang J, Zhang Y, Zhang F F, Su J, Meng C C, Zhang Q. The 2013 severe haze over southern Hebei, China: Model evaluation, source apportionment, and policy implications. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2014, 14(6): 3151–3173

[6] Wang L T, Xu J, Yang J, Zhao X J, Wei W, Cheng D D, Pan X M, Su J. Understanding haze pollution over the southern Hebei area of China using the CMAQ model. Atmospheric Environment, 2012, 56: 69–79

[7] Wang L T, Wei Z, Wei W, Fu J S, Meng C C, Ma S M. Source Apportionment of PM_2.5 in Top Polluted Cities in Hebei, China Using the CMAQ Model. Atmospheric Environment, 2015, 122: 723–736

[8] Wei Z, Yang J, Wang L T, Wei W, Zhang F F, Su J. Characteristics of the severe haze episode in Handan city in January, 2013. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2014, 34(5): 1118–1124 (in Chinese)

[9] Li X, Zhang Q, Zhang Y, Zheng B, Wang K, Chen Y, Wallington T J, Han W J, Shen W, Zhang X Y, He K B. Source contributions of urban PM_2.5 in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region: Changes between 2006 and 2013 and relative impacts of emissions and meteorology. Atmospheric Environment, 2015, 123: 229–239

[10] Cui H Y, Chen W H, Dai W, Liu H, Wang X M, He K. Source apportionment of PM_2.5 in Guangzhou combining observation data analysis and chemical transport model simulation. Atmospheric Environment, 2015, 116: 262–271

[11] Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt K B, Tignor M, Miller H L. Climate change 2007: The physical science basis, contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007

[12] Jacob D J, Winner D A. Effect of climate change on air quality. Atmospheric Environment, 2009, 43(1): 51–63

[13] Zhang Y. Online coupled meteorology and chemistry models: history, current status, and outlook. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2008, 8(11): 2895–2932

[14] Zhang Y, Wen X Y, Jang C. Simulating chemistry-aerosol-cloud-radiation-climate feedbacks over the continental U.S. using the online-coupled Weather Research Forecasting Model with chemistry (WRF/Chem). Atmospheric Environment, 2010, 44(29): 3568–3582

[15] José R S, Pérez J L, Balzarini A, Baró R, Curci G, Forkel R, Galmarini S, Grell G A, Hirtl M, Honzak L, Im U, Jimenez-Guerrero P, Langer M, Pirovano G, Tuccella P, Werhahn J, Žabkar R. Sensitivity of feedback effects in CBMZ/MOSAIC chemical mechanism. Atmospheric Environment, 2015, 115: 646–656

[16] Wang K, Zhang Y, Yahya H, Wu S Y, Grell G A. Implementation and initial application of new chemistry-aerosol options in WRF/Chem for simulating secondary organic aerosols and aerosol indirect effects for regional air quality. Atmospheric Environment, 2015, 115: 716–632

[17] Gao M, Carmichael G R, Saide P E, Lu Z F, Yu M, Streets D G, Wang Z F. Response of winter fine particulate matter concentrations to emission and meteorology changes in North China. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2016, 16(18): 11837–11851

[18] Gao M, Carmichael G R, Wang Y S, Saide P E, Yu M, Xin J Y, Liu Z, Wang Z F. Modeling study of the 2010 regional haze event in the North China Plain. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2016, 16(3): 1673–1691

[19] Wang J D, Wang S X, Jiang J K, Ding A J, Zheng M, Zhao B, Wong D C, Zhou W, Zheng G J, Wang L, Pleim J E, Hao J M. Impact of aerosol–meteorology interactions on fine particle pollution during China’s severe haze episode in January 2013. Environmental Research Letters, 2014, 9(9): 094002

[20] Gao Y, Zhang M, Liu Z, Wang L, Wang P, Xia X G, Tao M, Zhu L. Modeling the feedback between aerosol and meteorological variables in the atmospheric boundary layer during a severe fog–haze event over the North China Plain. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2015, 15(8): 4279–4295

[21] Gao M, Carmichael G R, Wang Y S, Wang Z F, Ji D S, Liu Z R, Wang Z F. Improving simulations of sulfate aerosols during winter haze over Northern China: The impacts of heterogeneous oxidation by NO₂. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2016, 10(5): 1–11

[22] Zhang B, Wang Y X, Hao J M. Simulating aerosol–radiation–cloud feedbacks on meteorology and air quality over eastern China under severe haze conditions in winter. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2015, 15(5): 2387–2404

[23] Lu X Y, Tang J, Zhang J, Yue J, Song G K, Hu J G. Annual Report on Analysis of Beijing Society-Building. Beijing: Social Science Academic Press, 2013 (in Chinese)

[24] Wang L T, Zhang Y, Wang K, Zheng B, Zhang Q, Wei W. Application of weather research and forecasting model with chemistry (WRF/Chem) over northern China: Sensitivity study, comparative evaluation, and policy implications. Atmospheric Environment, 2016, 124: 337–350

[25] Li M, Zhang Q, Streets D G, He K B, Zhang Y. Mapping Asian anthropogenic emissions of non-methane volatile organic compounds to multiple chemical mechanisms. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2014, 14(11): 5617–5638

[26] Guenther A, Karl T, Harley P, Wiedinmyer C, Palmer P I, Geron C. Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature). Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2006, 6(11): 3181–3210

[27] Shaw W J, Allwine K J, Fritz B G, Rutz F C, Rishel J P, Chapman E G. An evaluation of the wind erosion module in DUSTRAN. Atmospheric Environment, 2008, 42(8): 1907–1921

[28] Zaveri R A, Peters L K. A new lumped structure photochemical mechanism for largescale applications. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1999, 104(D23): 30387–30415

[29] Zaveri R A, Easter R C, Fast J D, Peters L K. Model for simulating aerosol interactions and chemistry (MOSAIC). Journal of Geophysical Research, 2008, 113(D13): D13204

[30] Dunker A M, Morris R E, Pollack A K, Schleyer C H, Yarwood G. Photochemical modeling of the impact of fuels and vehicles on urban ozone using auto oil program data. Environmental Science & Technology, 1996, 30(3): 787–801

[31] Jiang J K, Zhou W, Cheng Z, Wang S X, He K B, Hao J M. Particulate matter distributions in China during a winter period with frequent pollution episodes (January 2013). Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2015, 15: 494–503

[32] Emery C, Tai E, Yarwood G. Enhanced Meteorological Modeling and Performance Evaluation for Two Texas Ozone Episodes. Final Report. Houston: The Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, 2001. Available online at

[33] Tesche T W, McNally D E, Emery C A, Tai E. Evaluation of the MM5 Model Over the Midwestern U.S. for Three 8-hour Oxidant Episodes. Wright: Alpine Geophysics, LLC and Novato: ENVIRON International Corp., 2001

[34] U.S. EPA. Guidance on the use of models and other analyses for demonstrating attainment of air quality goals for ozone, PM_2.5, and Regional Haze. Research Triangle Park: Office of Air and Radiation/Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, 2007

[35] Boylan J W, Russell A G. PM and light extinction model performance metrics, goals, and criteria for three-dimensional air quality models. Atmospheric Environment, 2006, 40(26): 4946–4959

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature