New insights into mercury removal mechanism on CeO2-based catalysts: A first-principles study

Ling Li, Yu He, Xia Lu

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2) : 11.

PDF(373 KB)
PDF(373 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2) : 11. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-018-1007-1
research-article
research-article

New insights into mercury removal mechanism on CeO2-based catalysts: A first-principles study

Author information +
History +

Highlights

Hg0 is chemically adsorbed and fully oxidized by surface oxygen on CeO2.

HCl promotes the desorption of oxidized Hg on CeO2.

Surface oxygen is consumed by the H provided by HCl.

Desorption of oxidized Hg is a rate-determining step.

Maintenance of sufficient active surface oxygen is another rate-determining step.

Abstract

First-principles calculations were performed to investigate the mechanism of Hg0 adsorption and oxidation on CeO2(111). Surface oxygen activated by the reduction of Ce4+ to Ce3+ was vital to Hg0 adsorption and oxidation processes. Hg0 was fully oxidized by the surface lattice oxygen on CeO2(111), without using any other oxidizing agents. HCl could dissociate and react with the Hg adatom on CeO2(111) to form adsorbed Hg–Cl or Cl–Hg–Cl groups, which promoted the desorption of oxidized Hg and prevented CeO2 catalyst deactivation. In contrast, O–H and H–O–H groups formed during HCl adsorption consumed the active surface oxygen and prohibited Hg oxidation. The consumed surface oxygen was replenished by adding O2 into the flue gas. We proposed that oxidized Hg desorption and maintenance of sufficient active surface oxygen were the rate-determining steps of Hg0 removal on CeO2-based catalysts. We believe that our thorough understanding and new insights into the mechanism of the Hg0 removal process will help provide guidelines for developing novel CeO2-based catalysts and enhance the Hg0 removal efficiency.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Elemental mercury removal / Surface adsorption / Ceria / First-principles calculations

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ling Li, Yu He, Xia Lu. New insights into mercury removal mechanism on CeO2-based catalysts: A first-principles study. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2018, 12(2): 11 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-018-1007-1

References

[1]
Pavlish J H, Sondreal  E A, Mann  M D, Olson  E S, Galbreath  K C, Laudal  D L, Benson  S A. Status review of mercury control options for coal-fired power plants. Fuel Processing Technology, 2003, 82(2-3): 89–165
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Mergler D, Anderson  H A, Chan  L H, Mahaffey  K R, Murray  M, Sakamoto M,  Stern A H. Methylmercury exposure and health effects in humans: A worldwide concern. Ambio, 2007, 36(1): 3–11
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[3]
Wu Q, Wang  S, Li G,  Liang S,  Lin C J,  Wang Y, Cai  S, Liu K,  Hao J. Temporal trend and spatial distribution of speciated atmospheric mercury emissions in China during 1978–2014. Environmental Science & Technology, 2016, 50(24): 13428–13435
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[4]
Presto A A, Granite  E J. Survey of catalysts for oxidation of mercury in flue gas. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(18): 5601–5609
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[5]
Galbreath K C,  Zygarlicke C J. Mercury speciation in coal combustion and gasification flue gases. Environmental Science & Technology, 1996, 30(8): 2421–2426
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Wilcox J, Rupp  E, Ying S C,  Lim D H,  Negreira A S,  Kirchofer A,  Feng F, Lee  K. Mercury adsorption and oxidation in coal combustion and gasification processes. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2012, 90–91: 4–20
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Monnell J D, Vidic  R D, Gang  D, Karash A,  Granite E J. Recent Advances in Trace Metal Capture Using Micro and Nano-Scale Sorbents. In: Proceedings of the 23rd Pittsburgh Coal Conference. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, 2006
[8]
Granite E J, Pennline  H W, Hargis  R A. Novel sorbents for mercury removal from flue gas. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2000, 39(4): 1020–1029
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Hua X Y, Zhou  J S, Li  Q, Luo Z Y,  Cen K F. Gas-phase elemental mercury removal by CeO2 impregnated activated coke. Energy & Fuels, 2010, 24(10): 5426–5431
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Li H, Wu  C Y, Li  Y, Zhang J. CeO2-TiO2 catalysts for catalytic oxidation of elemental mercury in low-rank coal combustion flue gas. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(17): 7394–7400
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[11]
Zhou J, Hou  W, Qi P,  Gao X, Luo  Z, Cen K. CeO2-TiO2 sorbents for the removal of elemental mercury from syngas. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(17): 10056–10062
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[12]
Chang H, Wu  Q, Zhang T,  Li M, Sun  X, Li J,  Duan L, Hao  J. Design strategies for CeO2-MoO3 catalysts for DeNOx and Hg0 oxidation in the presence of HCl: The significance of the surface acid-base properties. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(20): 12388–12394
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[13]
Li H, Wu  S, Wu C Y,  Wang J, Li  L, Shih K. SCR atmosphere induced reduction of oxidized mercury over CuO-CeO2/TiO2 catalyst. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(12): 7373–7379
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[14]
Wang Y, Chang  H, Shi C,  Duan L, Li  J, Zhang G,  Guo L, You  Y. Novel Fe-Ce-O mixed metal oxides catalyst prepared by hydrothermal method for Hg0 oxidation in the presence of NH3. Catalysis Communications, 2017, 100: 210–213
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Reddy B M, Khan  A, Yamada Y,  Kobayashi T,  Loridant S,  Volta J C. Structural characterization of CeO2-MO2 (M= Si4+, Ti4+, and Zr4+) mixed oxides by Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, and other techniques. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2003, 107(41): 5162–5167
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Bera P, Patil  K C, Jayaram  V, Subbanna G N,  Hegde M S. Ionic dispersion of Pt and Pd on CeO2 by combustion method: Effect of metal-ceria interaction on catalytic activities for NO reduction and CO and hydrocarbon oxidation. Journal of Catalysis, 2000, 196(2): 293–301
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Roy S, Marimuthu  A, Hegde M S,  Madras G. High rates of NO and N2O reduction by CO, CO and hydrocarbon oxidation by O2 over nano crystalline Ce0.98Pd0.02O2-d: Catalytic and kinetic studies. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2007, 71(1-2): 23–31
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Cui L, Tang  Y, Zhang H,  Hector L G Jr,  Ouyang C,  Shi S, Li  H, Chen L. First-principles investigation of transition metal atom M (M= Cu, Ag, Au) adsorption on CeO2(110). Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2012, 14(6): 1923–1933
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[19]
Lim D H, Aboud  S, Wilcox J. Investigation of adsorption behavior of mercury on Au(111) from first principles. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(13): 7260–7266
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[20]
Lim D H, Wilcox  J. Heterogeneous mercury oxidation on au(111) from first principles. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(15): 8515–8522
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[21]
Jung J E, Geatches  D, Lee K,  Aboud S,  Brown G E Jr,  Wilcox J. First-principles investigation of mercury adsorption on the a-Fe2O3 surface. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2015, 119(47): 26512–26518
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Zhang B, Liu  J, Zheng C,  Chang M. Theoretical study of mercury species adsorption mechanism on MnO2(110) surface. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2014, 256(256): 93–100
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Zhang B, Liu  J, Shen F. Heterogeneous mercury oxidation by HCl over CeO2 catalyst: density functional theory study. Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2015, 119(27): 15047–15055
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Fabris S, Gironcol  S D, Baroni  S, Vicario G,  Balducci G. Taming multiple valency with density functionals: A case study of defective ceria. Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 2005, 71(4): 041102
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Da Silva J L F,  Ganduglia-Pirovano M V,  Sauer J,  Bayer V,  Kresse G. Hybrid functionals applied to rare-earth oxides: The example of ceria. Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 2007, 75(4): 045121
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Loschen C, Carrasco  J, Neyman K M,  Illas F.First-principles LDA+ U and GGA+ U study of cerium oxides: Dependence on the effective U parameter. Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 2007, 75(3): 035115 
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Kresse G, Hafner  J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 1993, 47(1): 558–561
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[28]
Kresse G, Furthmüller  J. Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 1996, 54(16): 11169–11186
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[29]
Kresse G, Furthmüller  J. Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set. Computational Materials Science, 1996, 6(1): 15–50
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Blöchl P E. Projector augmented-wave method. Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 1994, 50(24): 17953–17979
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[31]
Perdew J P, Burke  K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Physical Review Letters, 1996, 77(18): 3865–3868
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[32]
Perdew J P, Burke  K, Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Physical Review Letters, 1997, 78(7): 1396 
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Zhang C, Michaelides  A, King D A,  Jenkins S. Oxygen vacancy clusters on ceria: Decisive role of cerium f electrons. Physical Review B: Condensed Matter, 2009, 79(7): 075433
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Fabris S, de Gironcoli  S, Baroni S,  Vicario G,  Balducci G. Taming multiple valency with density functionals: A case study of defective ceria. Physical Review B: Condensed Matter and Materials Physics, 2005, 72(23): 237102
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Tang W, Sanville  E, Henkelman G. A grid-based Bader analysis algorithm without lattice bias. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter, 2009, 21(8): 084204
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[36]
Sanville E, Kenny  S D, Smith  R, Henkelman G. Improved grid-based algorithm for Bader charge allocation. Journal of Computational Chemistry, 2007, 28(5): 899–908
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by the State Key Laboratory of Organic-Inorganic Composites (oic-201701011), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (ZY1720), and Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Soft Matter Science and Engineering. We are grateful to Dr. Yang Sun and Dr. Hsien-Chieh Chiu for fruitful discussion.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2018 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(373 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/