
Influence of arsanilic acid, Cu2+, PO43− and their interaction on anaerobic digestion of pig manure
Ping He, Guangxue Wu, Rui Tang, Peilun Ji, Shoujun Yuan, Wei Wang, Zhenhu Hu
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (2) : 9.
Influence of arsanilic acid, Cu2+, PO43− and their interaction on anaerobic digestion of pig manure
The methanogenesis was severely inhibited with 0.46 mM ASA addition.
PO43− didn’t attenuate the methanogenesis inhibition in the existence of ASA.
ASA was transformed to As(III), As(V), MMA and DMA in anaerobic digestion.
Cu2+ mitigated the methanogenesis inhibition via impeding the degradation of ASA.
Arsanilic acid (ASA), copper ion (Cu2+) and phosphate (PO43−) are widely used as feed additives for pigs. Most of these three supplemented feed additives were excreted in feces and urine. Anaerobic digestion is often used for the management of pig manure. However, the interaction of ASA with Cu2+ or PO43− on anaerobic digestion is still not clear. In this study, the influence of ASA, Cu2+, PO43− and their interaction on anaerobic digestion of pig manure and the possible mechanisms were investigated. The initial concentrations of ASA, Cu2+ and PO43− were 0.46 mM, 2 mM and 2 mM in the anaerobic digester, respectively. The methanogenesis was severely inhibited in the assays with only ASA addition, only Cu2+ addition and ASA+ PO43− addition with the inhibition index of 97.8%, 46.6% and 82.6%, respectively, but the methanogenesis inhibition in the assay with ASA+ Cu2+ addition was mitigated with the inhibition index of 39.4%. PO43− had no obvious impacts on the degradation of ASA. However, Cu2+ addition inhibited the degradation of ASA, mitigating the methanogenesis inhibition. The existence of ASA would inhibit methanogenesis and generate more toxic inorganic arsenic compounds during anaerobic digestion, implying the limitation of anaerobic digestion for ASA- contaminated animal manure. However, the co-existence of ASA and Cu2+ could mitigate the inhibition. These results could provide useful information for the management of anaerobic digestion of pig manure containing ASA with Cu2+.
Arsanilic acid (ASA) / Methanogenesis / Inhibition / Copper / Phosphate / Inorganic arsenics
[1] |
Mata-Alvarez J, Dosta J, Romero-Güiza M S, Fonoll X, Peces M, Astals S. A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2014, 36: 412–427
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Wu G, Healy M G, Zhan X. Effect of the solid content on anaerobic digestion of meat and bone meal. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(19): 4326–4331
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Ministry of Agriculture of the People’s Republic of China. Scheme for promoting the utilization of agricultural wastes. 2016. Available online at http://www.moa.gov.cn/govpublic/FZJHS/201609/t20160919_5277846.htm (accessed August 11, 2016) (in Chinese)
|
[4] |
Abbasi T, Tauseef S M, Abbasi S A. Anaerobic digestion for global warming control and energy generation-An overview. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2012, 16(5): 3228–3242
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Xie S H, Lawlor P G, Frost P, Dennehy C D, Hu Z H, Zhan X M. A pilot scale study on synergistic effects of co-digestion of pig manure and grass silage. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 2017, 123: 244–250
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Sutton A L, Brumm M C, Kelly D T, Henderson C A, Mayrose V B. Effect of dietary salt, arsenic and copper additions and waste management systems on selected microbial organisms in swine wastes. Journal of Animal Science, 1980, 51(4): 791–797
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Liu X, Zhang W, Hu Y, Cheng H. Extraction and detection of organoarsenic feed additives and common arsenic species in environmental matrices by HPLC–ICP-MS. Microchemical Journal, 2013, 108(3): 38–45
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Sierra-Alvarez R, Cortinas I, Field J A. Methanogenic inhibition by roxarsone (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenylarsonic acid) and related aromatic arsenic compounds. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 175(1–3): 352–358
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Wang H L, Hu Z H, Tong Z L, Xu Q, Wang W, Yuan S J. Effect of arsanilic acid on anaerobic methanogenic process: Kinetics, inhibition and biotransformation analysis. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2014, 91(91): 179–185
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Sierra-Alvarez R, Cortinas I, Yenal U, Field J A. Methanogenic inhibition by arsenic compounds. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2004, 70(9): 5688–5691
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Shi L, Wang W, Yuan S J, Hu Z H. Electrochemical stimulation of microbial roxarsone degradation under anaerobic conditions. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 48(14): 7951–7958
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Shui M C, Ji F, Tang R, Yuan S J, Zhan X M, Wang W, Hu Z H. Impact of roxarsone on the UASB reactor performance and its degradation. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2016, 10(6): 4
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Stolz J F, Perera E, Kilonzo B, Kail B, Crable B, Fisher E, Ranganathan M, Wormer L, Basu P.Biotransformation of 3-nitro-4-hydroxybenzene arsonic acid (roxarsone) and release of inorganic arsenic by Clostridium species. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(3): 818–823
|
[14] |
Bikker P, Jongbloed A W, van Baal J. Dose-dependent effects of copper supplementation of nursery diets on growth performance and fecal consistency in weaned pigs. Journal of Animal Science, 2016, 94(S3): 181–186
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Bolan N S, Khan M A, Donaldson J, Adriano D C, Matthew C. Distribution and bioavailability of copper in farm effluent. The Science of the Total Environment, 2003, 309(1–3): 225–236
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Li Y X, Li W, Wu J, Xu L C, Su Q H, Xiong X. Contribution of additives Cu to its accumulation in pig feces: study in Beijing and Fuxin of China. Journal of Environmental Sciences-China, 2007, 19(5): 610–615
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Guo J, Ostermann A, Siemens J, Dong R, Clemens J. Short term effects of copper, sulfadiazine and difloxacin on the anaerobic digestion of pig manure at low organic loading rates. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 2012, 32(1): 131–136
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Boonsawang P, Rerngnarong A, Tongurai C, Chaiprapat S. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus on the performance of acidogenic and methanogenic reactors for treatment of biodiesel wastewater. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, 2014, 36(6): 643–649
|
[19] |
Zayed G, Winter J. Inhibition of methane production from whey by heavy metals--protective effect of sulfide. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2000, 53(6): 726–731
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Tang R, Chen H, Yuan S J, Zhan X M, Wang W, Hu Z H. Arsenic accumulation and volatilization in a 260-day cultured upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2017, 311: 277–283
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Mahar R B, Sahito A R, Yue D, Khan K. Modeling and simulation of landfill gas production from pretreated MSW landfill simulator. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2016, 10(1): 159–167
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Mu Y, Yu H Q, Wang G. A kinetic approach to anaerobic hydrogen-producing process. Water Research, 2007, 41(5): 1152–1160
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Zwietering M H, Jongenburger I, Rombouts F M, van ’t Riet K. Modeling of the bacterial growth curve. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1990, 56(6): 1875–1881
Pubmed
|
[24] |
Hu Z H, Yu H Q. Anaerobic digestion of cattail by rumen cultures. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 2006, 26(11): 1222–1228
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Zhang F F, Wang W, Yuan S J, Hu Z H. Biodegradation and speciation of roxarsone in an anaerobic granular sludge system and its impacts. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2014, 279(5): 562–568
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Rosen B P, Ajees A A, McDermott T R. Life and death with arsenic. Bioessays, 2011, 33(5): 350–357
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Li W W, Yu H Q. From wastewater to bioenergy and biochemicals via two-stage bioconversion processes: a future paradigm. Biotechnology Advances, 2011, 29(6): 972–982
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Mu Y, Wang G, Yu H Q. Response surface methodological analysis on biohydrogen production by enriched anaerobic cultures. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2006, 38(7): 905–913
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Mu Y, Yu H Q, Wang G. Evaluation of three methods for enriching H2-producing cultures from anaerobic sludge. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2007, 40(4): 947–953
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Gonzalez-Estrella J, Puyol D, Sierra-Alvarez R, Field J A. Role of biogenic sulfide in attenuating zinc oxide and copper nanoparticle toxicity to acetoclastic methanogenesis. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2015, 283: 755–763
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Zhang M, He Z P, Yuan H, Zhu L, Guo C Z, Yin L, Wu J, Deng S J, Yuan L Y, Wen L X. DNA damage and decrease of cellular oxidase activity in piglet Sertoli cells exposed to arsanilic acid. The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science, 2011, 73(2): 199–203
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Kim K W, Bang S, Zhu Y, Meharg A A, Bhattacharya P. Arsenic geochemistry, transport mechanism in the soil-plant system, human and animal health issues. Environment International, 2009, 35(3): 453–454
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Liu R, Xu W, Wu K, Gong W, Liu H, Qu J. Species distribution of arsenic in sediments after an unexpected emergent discharge of high-arsenic wastewater into a river. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2013, 7(4): 568–578
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Sharma V K, Sohn M. Aquatic arsenic: Toxicity, speciation, transformations, and remediation. Environment International, 2009, 35(4): 743–759
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Ronkart S N, Laurent V, Carbonnelle P, Mabon N, Copin A, Barthélemy J P. Speciation of five arsenic species (arsenite, arsenate, MMAAV, DMAAV and AsBet) in different kind of water by HPLC-ICP-MS. Chemosphere, 2007, 66(4): 738–745
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
/
〈 |
|
〉 |