PM10 emissions from industrial coal-fired chain-grate boilers

Xinghua Li , Junzan Han , Lei Duan

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (6) : 18

PDF (344KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2017, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (6) : 18 DOI: 10.1007/s11783-017-0966-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

PM10 emissions from industrial coal-fired chain-grate boilers

Author information +
History +
PDF (344KB)

Abstract

PM in submicron mode emitted from raw coal burning contribute to 33 % of PM10.

PM in submicron mode from briquette coal burning contribute to 86 % of PM10.

Collection efficiency of muticlones and scrubbers is 34% for submicron particle.

Peak of submicron mode in normal operation period is larger than start-up period.

Industrial coal-fired boiler is an important air pollutant emission source in China. The chain-grate boiler is the most extensively used type of industrial coal-fired boiler. An electrical low-pressure impactor, and a Dekati® Low Pressure Impactor were applied to determine mass and number size distributions of PM10 at the inlet and the outlet of the particulate emission control devices at six coal-fired chain-grate boilers. The mass size distribution of PM10 generated from coal-fired chain-grate boilers generally displays a bimodal distribution that contains a submicron mode and a coarse mode. The PM in the submicron mode for burning with raw coal contributes to 33%±10 % of PM10 emissions, much higher than those for pulverized boilers. And the PM in the submicron mode for burning with briquette contributes up to 86 % of PM10 emissions. Multiclones and scrubbers are not efficient for controlling PM10 emission. Their average collection efficiencies for sub-micron particle and super-micron particle are 34% and 78%, respectively. Operating conditions of industrial steam boilers have influence on PM generation. Peak of the submicron mode during normal operation period is larger than the start-up period.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

coal-fired chain-grate boiler / PM 10 / size distribution / particulate emission control devices / size-dependent collection efficiency

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xinghua Li, Junzan Han, Lei Duan. PM10 emissions from industrial coal-fired chain-grate boilers. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2017, 11(6): 18 DOI:10.1007/s11783-017-0966-y

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Ministry of Environmental Protection. China. Available online at accessed 12th Dec. 12, 2015)

[2]

NevilleM, QuannR J, HaynesB S, SarofimA F. Vaporization and condensation of mineral matter during pulverized coal combustion.Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 1981, 18(1): 1267–1274

[3]

QuannR J, NevilleM, JanghorbaniM, MimsC A, SarofimA F. Mineral matter and trace-element vaporization in a laboratory-pulverized coal combustion system.Environmental Science & Technology, 1982, 16(11): 776–781

[4]

McElroyM W, CarrR C, EnsorD S, MarkowskiG R. Size distribution of fine particles from coal combustion.Science, 1982, 215(4528): 13–19

[5]

MoisioM. Real time size distribution measurement of combustion aerosols. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Tampere: Tampere University of Technology, 1999

[6]

YiH, HaoJ, DuanL, LiX, GuoX. Characteristics of inhalable particulate matter concentration and size distribution from power plants in China.Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2006, 56(9): 1243–1251

[7]

SuiJ, XuM, DuY, LiuY, YuD, YiG. Emission characteristics and chemical composition of PM10 from two coal fired power plants in China.Journal of the Energy Institute, 2007, 80(4): 192–198 doi:10.1179/174602207X242418  

[8]

SeamesW S. An initial study of the fine fragmentation fly ash particle mode generated during pulverized coal combustion.Fuel Processing Technology, 2003, 81(2): 109–125 doi:10.1016/S0378-3820(03)00006-7

[9]

LinakW P, MillerC A, SeamesW S, WendtJ O L, IshinomoriT, EndoY, MiyamaeS. On trimodal particle size distributions in fly ash from pulverized-coal combustion.Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2002, 29(1): 441–447

[10]

YuD, XuM, YaoH, SuiJ, LiuX, YuY, CaoQ. Use of elemental size distributions in identifying particle formation modes.Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2007, 31(2): 1921–1928

[11]

ZhaoZ, DuQ, ZhaoG, GaoJ, DongH, CaoY, HanQ, YuanP, SuL. Fine particle emission from an industrial coal-fired circulating fluidized-bed boiler equipped with a fabric filter in China.Energy & Fuels, 2014, 28(7): 4769–4780

[12]

TurnS R. An Introduction to Combustion: Concepts and Applications. 2nd ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 2000

[13]

ZhangY, SchauerJ J, ZhangY, ZengL, WeiY, LiuY, ShaoM. Characteristics of particulate carbon emissions from real-world Chinese coal combustion.Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(14): 5068–5073

[14]

GeS, BaiZ, LiuW, ZhuT, WangT, QingS, ZhangJ. Boiler briquette coal versus raw coal: Part I—Stack gas emissions.Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2001, 51(4): 524–533

[15]

China Pollution Source Census. Available online at accessed Dec. 12, 2015)

[16]

KeskinenJ, PietarinenK, LehtimäkiM J. Electrical low pressure impactor.Journal of Aerosol Science, 1992, 23(4): 353–360

[17]

Dekati Ltd Technical Note.Unidealities in ELPITM mass measurement.

[18]

Dekati@ DI-1000 diluter brochure. Available online at accessed Dec. 12, 2015)

[19]

DLPI brochure. Available online at accessed Dec. 12, 2015)

[20]

State Environmental Protection Administration of China. Handbook of Pollutant Generation and Emission Factors from Industrial Sources. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 1996

[21]

LichtW. Air Pollution Control Engineering: Basic Calculations for Particulate Collection, 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker, 1988

[22]

KimH T, JungC H, OhS N, LeeK W. Particle removal efficiency of gravitational wet scrubber considering diffusion, interception, and impaction.Environmental Engineering Science, 2001, 18(2): 125–136

[23]

DirgoJ, LeithD. Cyclone collection efficiency: comparison of experimental results with theoretical predictions.Aerosol Science and Technology, 1985, 4(4): 401–415

[24]

ZhaoB. Development of a new method for evaluating cyclone efficiency.Chemical Engineering and Processing, 2005, 44(4): 447–451

[25]

LeeB K, MohanB R, ByeonS H, LimK S, HongE P. Evaluating the performance of a turbulent wet scrubber for scrubbing particulate matter.Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2013, 63(5): 499–506

[26]

LiuX, XuM, YaoH, YuD, GaoX, CaoQ, CaiY. Effect of combustion parameters on the emission and chemical composition of particulate matter during coal combustion.Energy & Fuels, 2007, 21(1): 157–162

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer–Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (344KB)

2752

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/