A full-scale integrated-bioreactor with two zones treating odours from sludge thickening tank and dewatering house: performance and microbial characteristics
Jianwei Liu, Kaixiong Yang, Lin Li, Jingying Zhang
A full-scale integrated-bioreactor with two zones treating odours from sludge thickening tank and dewatering house: performance and microbial characteristics
The integrated-bioreactor consists of a suspended zone and an immobilized zone.
H2S and NH3 from WWTP were effectively eliminated by the integrated-bioreactor.
Different microbial populations dominated in the individual zones.
Most of the H2S was bio-oxidized into elemental sulfur and sulfate in IZ.
Large amount of NH3 was converted into nitrate and nitrite in SZ.
A full-scale integrated-bioreactor consisting of a suspended zone and an immobilized zone was employed to treat the ordours emitted from a wastewater treatment plant. The inlet concentrations of H2S and NH3 were 1.6–38.6 mg·m−3 and 0.1–6.7 mg·m−3, respectively, while the steady-state outlet concentrations were reduced to 0–2.8 mg·m−3 for H2S and 0–0.5 mg·m−3 for NH3. Both H2S and NH3 were eliminated effectively by the integrated-bioreactor. The removal efficiencies of H2S and NH3 differed between the two zones. Four species of microorganisms related to the degradation of H2S and NH3 were isolated. The characteristics and distributions of the microbes in the bioreactor depended on the inlet concentration of substrates and the micro-environmental conditions in the individual zones. Product analysis indicated that most of the H2S was oxidized into sulfate in the immobilized zone but was dissolved into the liquid phase in the suspended zone. A large amount of NH3 was converted into nitrate and nitrite by nitration in the suspended zone, whereas only a small amount of NH3 was transferred to the aqueous phase mainly by absorption or chemical neutralization in the immobilized zone. Different microbial populations dominated the individual zones, and the major biodegradation products varied accordingly.
Biological deodorization / Microbial characteristics / Ammonia / Hydrogen sulfide / Wastewater treatment plant
[1] |
Omri I, Bouallagui H, Aouidi F, Godon J J, Hamdi M. H2S gas biological removal efficiency and bacterial community diversity in biofilter treating wastewater odor. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(22): 10202–10209
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Xi J, Kang I, Hu H, Zhang X. A biofilter model for simultaneous simulation of toluene removal and bed pressure drop under varied inlet loadings. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2015, 9(3): 554–562
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Baspi A BTurkeṙ MHocalar A, Ozturk I. Biogas desulphurization at technical scale by lithotrophic denitrification: integration of sulphide and nitrogen removal. Process Biochemistry, 2011, 46(4): 916–922
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Chen Y, Fan Z, Ma L, Yin J, Luo M, Cai W. Performance of three pilot-scale immobilized-cell biotrickling filters for removal of hydrogen sulfide from a contaminated air steam. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 2014, 21(5): 450–456
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Burgess J E, Parsons S A, Stuetz R M. Developments in odour control and waste gas treatment biotechnology: a review. Biotechnology Advances, 2001, 19(1): 35–63
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Ralebitso-Senior T K, Senior E, Di Felice R, Jarvis K. Waste gas biofiltration: advances and limitations of current approaches in microbiology. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(16): 8542–8573
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Chitwood D E, Devinny J S, Reynolds F E. Evaluation of a two-stage biofilter for treatment of POTW waste air. Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy, 1999, 18(3): 212–221
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
vanLith C, Leson G, Michelsen R.
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Zhang L, Ma J, Jin Y, Zhang H, Liu Y, Cai L. Abatement of sulfide generation in sewage by glutaraldehyde supplementation and the impact on the activated sludge accordingly. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2015, 9(2): 365–370
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Li Y, Shi L, Qian Y, Tang J. Diffusion of municipal wastewater treatment technologies in China: a collaboration network perspective. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2017, 11(1): 11
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Li F, Lei T, Zhang Y, Wei J, Yang Y. Preparation, characterization of sludge adsorbent and investigations on its removal of hydrogen sulfide under room temperature. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2015, 9(2): 190–196
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Liang Y, Quan X, Chen J, Chung J S, Sung J Y, Chen S, Xue D, Zhao Y. Long-term results of ammonia removal and transformation by biofiltration. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2000, 80(1–3): 259–269
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Rabbani K A, Charles W, Kayaalp A, Cord-Ruwisch R, Ho G. Pilot-scale biofilter for the simultaneous removal of hydrogen sulphide and ammonia at a wastewater treatment plant. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2015, 107: 1–10
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Mannucci A, Munz G, Mori G, Lubello C. Biomass accumulation modelling in a highly loaded biotrickling filter for hydrogen sulphide removal. Chemosphere, 2012, 88(6): 712–717
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Both G J, Gerards S, Laanbroek H J. Most probable numbers of chemolitho-autotrophic nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in well drained grassland soils: stimulation by high nitrite concentrations. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 1990, 74(4): 287–293
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Cho K S, Zhang L, Hirai M, Shoda M. Removal characteristics of hydrogen sulphide and methanethiol by Thiobacillus sp. isolated from peat in biological deodorization. Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, 1991, 71(1): 44–49
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Moriarty D J, Nicholas D J. Products of sulphide oxidation in extracts of Thiobacillus concretivorus. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1970, 197(2): 143–151
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Chung Y C, Huang C, Tseng C P. Operation optimization of Thiobacillus thioparus CH11 biofilter for hydrogen sulfide removal. Journal of Biotechnology, 1996, 52(1): 31–38
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Li L, Zhang J, Lin J, Liu J. Biological technologies for the removal of sulfur containing compounds from waste streams: bioreactors and microbial characteristics. World Journal of Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2015, 31(10): 1501–1515
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Wang L, Wei B, Chen Z, Deng L, Song L, Wang S, Zheng D, Liu Y, Pu X, Zhang Y. Effect of inoculum and sulfide type on simultaneous hydrogen sulfide removal from biogas and nitrogen removal from swine slurry and microbial mechanism. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2015, 99(24): 10793–10803
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Devinny J S, Deshusses M A, Webster T S. Biofiltration for Air Pollution Control.New York: Crc Pr Inc, 1999
|
[22] |
Mudliar S, Giri B, Padoley K, Satpute D, Dixit R, Bhatt P, Pandey R, Juwarkar A, Vaidya A. Bioreactors for treatment of VOCs and odours—A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 2010, 91(5): 1039–1054
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Liu D, Hansen M J, Guldberg L B, Feilberg A. Kinetic evaluation of removal of odorous contaminants in a three-stage biological air filter. Environmental Science & Technology, 2012, 46(15): 8261–8269
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Esposito R. Genium’s Handbook of Safety, Health, and Environmental Data (for Common Hazardous Substances). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, Genium Publishing Corporation, 1999
|
[25] |
Liu J W, Zhao Y Z, Ma W L. Removal of ammonia from waste gases by a biotrickling filter. Advanced Materials Research, 2011, 233–235: 759–764
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Ministry of Environmental Protection of China.Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 4th ed. Beijing, China: Chinese Environmental Science Publishers, 2002
|
[27] |
Lin L, Liu J X, Wang J L, Pan X L. Identification and characteristic analysis of microorganisms in an integrated bioreactor for odours treatment. International Journal of Environment and Pollution, 2009, 37(1): 216–234
|
[28] |
Kanagawa T, Mikami E. Removal of methanethiol, dimethyl sulfide, dimethyl disulfide, and hydrogen sulfide from contaminated air by Thiobacillus thioparus TK-m. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1989, 55(3): 555–558 PMID:2930168
|
[29] |
Cho K S, Ryu H W, Lee N Y. Biological deodorization of hydrogen sulfide using porous lava as a carrier of Thiobacillus thiooxidans. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2000, 90(1): 25–31
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[30] |
Shinabe K, Oketani S, Ochi T, Matsumura M. Characteristics of hydrogen sulfide removal by Thiobacillus thiooxidans KS1 isolated from a carrier-packed biological deodorization system. Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, 1995, 80(6): 592–598
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[31] |
Veir J K, Schroeder E D, Chang D P Y, Scow K M. Interaction between toluene and dichloromethane degrading populations in a compost biofilter. In: Proceedings of the 89th Annual Meeting and Exhibition of the Air and Waste Management Association, Nashville. Pittsburgh: USA Air & Waste Management Association, 1996, 89
|
[32] |
Chung Y C, Huang C, Tseng C P. Biological elimination of H2S and NH3 from wastegases by biofilter packed with immobilized heterotrophic bacteria. Chemosphere, 2001, 43(8): 1043–1050nbsp;
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Elias A, Barona A, Arreguy A, Rios J, Aranguiz I, Penas J. Evaluation of a packing material for the biodegradation of H2S and product analysis. Process Biochemistry, 2002, 37(8): 813–820
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Easter C, Quigley C, Burrowes P, Witherspoon J, Apgar D. Odor and air emissions control using biotechnology for both collection and wastewater treatment systems. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2005, 113(2–3): 93–104
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
YangY, AllenE R. Biofiltration control of hydrogen sulfide 1. Design and operational parameters.Air & Waste, 1994, 44(7): 863–868
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |