Diffusion of municipal wastewater treatment technologies in China: a collaboration network perspective
Yang Li, Lei Shi, Yi Qian, Jie Tang
Diffusion of municipal wastewater treatment technologies in China: a collaboration network perspective
Real wastewater treatment technology diffusion process was investigated.
The research is based on a dataset of 3136 municipal WWTPs and 4634 organizations.
A new metric was proposed to measure the importance of a project in diffusion.
Important projects usually involve central organizations in collaboration.
Organizations become more central by participating in less important projects.
The diffusion of municipal wastewater treatment technology is vital for urban environment in developing countries. China has built more than 3000 municipal wastewater treatment plants in the past three decades, which is a good chance to understand how technologies diffused in reality. We used a data-driven approach to explore the relationship between the diffusion of wastewater treatment technologies and collaborations between organizations. A database of 3136 municipal wastewater treatment plants and 4634 collaborating organizations was built and transformed into networks for analysis. We have found that: 1) the diffusion networks are assortative, and the patterns of diffusion vary across technologies; while the collaboration networks are fragmented, and have an assortativity around zero since the 2000s. 2) Important projects in technology diffusion usually involve central organizations in collaboration networks, but organizations become more central in collaboration by doing circumstantial projects in diffusion. 3) The importance of projects in diffusion can be predicted with a Random Forest model at a good accuracy and precision level. Our findings provide a quantitative understanding of the technology diffusion processes, which could be used for water-relevant policy-making and business decisions.
Innovation diffusion / Collaboration network / Wastewater treatment plant / Complex network / Data driven
[1] |
Lofrano G, Brown J. Wastewater management through the ages: a history of mankind. Science of the Total Environment, 2010, 408(22): 5254–5264
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Dechezleprêtre A, Haščič I, Johnstone N. Invention and International Diffusion of Water Conservation and Availability Technologies: Evidence from Patent Data. Paris: OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 82, OECD Publishing, 2015
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
National Bureau of Statistics of China. Statistical Communiqué of the People’s Republic of China On the 2014 National Economic and Social Development. Beijing: National Bureau of Statistics of China, 2015 (in Chinese)
|
[4] |
Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China. Construction and Operation Report of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Facilities in 2014 Fourth Quarter. Beijing: Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of China, 2015 (in Chinese)
|
[5] |
Qu J, Fan M. The current state of water quality and technology development for water pollution control in China. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 2010, 40(6): 519–560
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Jin L, Zhang G, Tian H. Current state of sewage treatment in China. Water Research, 2014, 66(1): 85–98
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Choi J, Chung J, Lee D. Risk perception analysis: participation in China’s water PPP market. International Journal of Project Management, 2010, 28(6): 580–592
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Jang W, Lee D, Choi J. Identifying the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats to TOT and divestiture business models in China’s water market. International Journal of Project Management, 2014, 32(2): 298–314
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Du J, Fan Y, Qian X. Occurrence and behavior of pharmaceuticals in sewage treatment plants in eastern China. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2015, 9(4): 725–730
|
[10] |
Sun Y, Lu Y, Wang T, Ma H, He G. Pattern of patent-based environmental technology innovation in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2008, 75(7): 1032–1042
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Kemp R, Volpi M. The diffusion of clean technologies: a review with suggestions for future diffusion analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2008, 16(1): S14–S21
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Peres R, Muller E, Mahajan V. Innovation diffusion and new product growth models: a critical review and research directions. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2010, 27(2): 91–106
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Stoneman P, Battisti G. The diffusion of new technology. In: Hall B, Rosenberg N, eds. Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. Vol. 2, 1st ed. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2010, 733–760
|
[14] |
Hammar H, Löfgren Å. Explaining adoption of end of pipe solutions and clean technologies – determinants of firms’ investments for reducing emissions to air in four sectors in Sweden. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(7): 3644–3651
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Galán J, Olmo R, López-Paredes A. Diffusion of domestic water conservation technologies in an ABM-GIS integrated model. In: Corchado E, Abraham A, Pedrycz W, eds. Hybrid Artificial Intelligence Systems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2008, 567–574
|
[16] |
Delre S A, Jager W, Bijmolt T H A, Janssen M A. Will it spread or not? The effects of social influences and network topology on innovation diffusion. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2010, 27(2): 267–282
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Allan C, Jaffe A B, Sin I. Diffusion of green technology: a survey. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 2014, 7(1): 1–33
|
[18] |
Andersen M M, Foxon T J. The greening of innovation systems for eco-innovation–Towards an Evolutionary Climate Mitigation Policy. In: Proceedings of the Druid Summer Conference 2009. Denmark: DRUID Society, 2009
|
[19] |
Bass F M. A new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Science, 1969, 15(5): 215–227
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Chu J, Wang H, Wang C. Exploring price effects on the residential water conservation technology diffusion process: a case study of Tianjin city. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2013, 7(5): 688-698
|
[21] |
Kiesling E, Günther M, Stummer C, Wakolbinger L M. Agent-based simulation of innovation diffusion: a review. Central European Journal of Operations Research, 2012, 20(2): 183–230
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Schwarz N, Ernst A. Agent-based modeling of the diffusion of environmental innovations — An empirical approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2009, 76(4): 497–511
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Goetzke F, Rave T, Triebswetter U. Diffusion of environmental technologies: a patent citation analysis of glass melting and glass burners. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2012, 14(2): 189–217
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Hall B H, Helmers C. Innovation and diffusion of clean/green technology: can patent commons help? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 2013, 66(1): 33–51
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Gomez-Rodriguez M, Leskovec J, Krause A. Inferring networks of diffusion and influence. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data, 2012, 5(4): 1–37 (TKDD)
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Brunson J C, Fassino S, McInnes A, Narayan M, Richardson B, Franck C, Ion P, Laubenbacher R. Evolutionary events in a mathematical sciences research collaboration network. Scientometrics, 2014, 99(3): 973–998
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Kim J, Perez C. Co-authorship network analysis in industrial ecology research community. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 2015, 19(2): 222–235
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Newman M E. Mixing patterns in networks. Physical Review E: Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 2003, 67(2): 026126
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Newman M. Networks: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010
|
[30] |
Page L, Brin S, Motwani R, Winograd T. The Pagerank Citation Ranking: Bringing Order to the Web. Technical Report. Stanford: Stanford InfoLab, 1999
|
[31] |
Kitsak M, Gallos L K, Havlin S, Liljeros F, Muchnik L, Stanley H E, Makse H A. Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks. Nature Physics, 2010, 6(11): 888–893
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[32] |
Freeman L C. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 1977, 40(1): 35–41
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Sarig L E, Pfitzner R, Scholtes I, Garas A, Schweitzer F. Predicting scientific success based on coauthorship networks. EPJ Data Science, 2014, 3(1): 1–16
|
[34] |
Newman M. The first-mover advantage in scientific publication. EPL, 2009, 86(6): 68001
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Breiman L. Random forests. Machine Learning, 2001, 45(1): 5–32
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |