Development of source profiles and their application in source apportionment of PM2.5 in Xiamen, China

Ningning Zhang, Mazhan Zhuang, Jie Tian, Pengshan Tian, Jieru Zhang, Qiyuan Wang, Yaqing Zhou, Rujin Huang, Chongshu Zhu, Xuemin Zhang, Junji Cao

PDF(497 KB)
PDF(497 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2016, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (5) : 17. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-016-0879-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Development of source profiles and their application in source apportionment of PM2.5 in Xiamen, China

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Seasonal and spatial distribution of PM2.5 and its component were shown.

Local source profiles of major PM2.5 sources were developed.

Source apportionment was conducted using CMB model.

Inorganic secondary components is the biggest contribution at Xiamen.

Ambient PM2.5 samples were collected at four sites in Xiamen, including Gulangyu (GLY), Hongwen (HW), Huli (HL) and Jimei (JM) during January, April, July and October 2013. Local source samples were obtained from coal burning power plants, industries, motor vehicles, biomass burning, fugitive dust, and sea salt for the source apportionment studies. The highest value of PM2.5 mass concentration and species related to human activities (SO42–, NO3, Pb, Ni, V, Cu, Cd, organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC)) were found in the ambient samples from HL, and the highest and lowest loadings of PM2.5 and its components occurred in winter and summer, respectively. The reconstructed mass balance indicated that ambient PM2.5 consisted of 24% OM (organic matter), 23% sulfate, 14% nitrate, 9% ammonium, 9% geological material, 6% sea salt, 5% EC and 10% others. For the source profiles, the dominant components were OC for coal burning, motor vehicle, biomass burning and sea salt; SO42– for industry; and crustal elements for fugitive dust. Source contributions were calculated using a chemical mass balance (CMB) model based on ambient PM2.5 concentrations and the source profiles. GLY was characterized by high contributions from secondary sulfate and cooking, while HL and JM were most strongly affected by motor vehicle emissions, and biomass burning and fugitive dust, respectively. The CMB results indicated that PM2.5 from Xiamen is composed of 27.4% secondary inorganic components, 20.8% motor vehicle emissions, 11.7% fugitive dust, 9.9% sea salt, 9.3% coal burning, 5.0% biomass burning, 3.1% industry and 6.8% others.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

PM2.5 / Source profile / Source apportionment / CMB / Xiamen

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ningning Zhang, Mazhan Zhuang, Jie Tian, Pengshan Tian, Jieru Zhang, Qiyuan Wang, Yaqing Zhou, Rujin Huang, Chongshu Zhu, Xuemin Zhang, Junji Cao. Development of source profiles and their application in source apportionment of PM2.5 in Xiamen, China. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(5): 17 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-016-0879-1

References

[1]
Cao J J, Wang Q Y, Chow J C, Watson J G, Tie X X, Shen Z X, Wang P, An Z S. Impacts of aerosol compositions on visibility impairment in Xi’an, China. Atmospheric Environment, 2012, 59: 559–566
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Wang Q, Cao J, Tao J, Li N, Su X, Chen L W A, Wang P, Shen Z, Liu S, Dai W. Long-term trends in visibility and at Chengdu, China. PLoS ONE, 2013, 8(7): e68894
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[3]
Dockery D W, Pope C A3rd, Xu X, Spengler J D, Ware J H, Fay M E, Ferris B GJr, Speizer F E. An association between air pollution and mortality in six U.S. cities. New England Journal of Medicine, 1993, 329(24): 1753–1759
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[4]
Cao J, Xu H, Xu Q, Chen B, Kan H. Fine particulate matter constituents and cardiopulmonary mortality in a heavily polluted Chinese city. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2012, 120(3): 373–378
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[5]
IPCC. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013
[6]
Matson P, Lohse K A, Hall S J. The globalization of nitrogen deposition: consequences for terrestrial ecosystems. Ambio, 2002, 31(2): 113–119
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[7]
Cao J J. PM2.5 and the Environment in China. Beijing: Science Press, 2014, 4–5
[8]
Canonaco F, Crippa M, Slowik J G, Baltensperger U, Prévôt A S H. SoFi, an IGOR-based interface for the efficient use of the generalized multilinear engine (ME-2) for the source apportionment: ME-2 application to aerosol mass spectrometer data. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2013, 6(12): 3649–3661
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Wen W, Cheng S Y, Liu L, Wang G, Wang X Q. Source apportionment of PM2.5 in Tangshan, China—Hybrid approaches for primary and secondary species apportionment. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2016, 10(5): 6
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Guo H, Wang T, Louie P K K. Source apportionment of ambient non-methane hydrocarbons in Hong Kong: application of a principal component analysis/absolute principal component scores (PCA/APCS) receptor model. Environmental Pollution, 2004, 129(3): 489–498
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[11]
Paatero P, Tapper U. Analysis of different modes of factor analysis as least squares fit Problem. Chemo metries and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 1993, 18, 183–194
[12]
Hidy G M, Friedlander S K. The Nature of the Los Angeles Aerosol. In: Proceedings of the Second International Clean Air Congress. New York: Academic Press, 1971, 391–404
[13]
Henry R C. History and fundamentals of multivariate air quality receptor models. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 1997, 37(1): 37–42
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Banerjee T, Murari V, Kumar M, Raju M P. Source apportionment of airborne particulates through receptor modeling: Indian scenario. Atmospheric Research, 2015, 164–165: 167–187
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Samara C, Kouimtzis T, Tsitouridou R, Kanias G, Simeonov V. Chemical mass balance source apportionment of PM10 in an industrialized urban area of Northern Greece. Atmospheric Environment, 2003, 37(1): 41–54
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Yin J X, Harrison R M, Chen Q, Rutter A, Schauer J J. Source apportionment of fine particles at urban background and rural sites in the UK atmosphere. Atmospheric Environment, 2010, 44(6): 841–851
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Zheng M, Zhang Y J, Yan C Q, Fu H Y, Niu H Y, Huang K, Hu M, Zeng L M, Liu Q Z, Pei B, Fu Q Y. Establishing PM2.5 industrial source profiles in Shanghai. China. Environmental Sciences, 2013, 33(8): 1354–1359(in Chinese)
[18]
Li T C, Chen W H, Yuan C S, Wu S P, Wang X H. Physicochemical characteristics and source apportionment of atmospheric aerosol particles in Kinmen-Xiamen Airshed. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2013, 13: 308–323
[19]
Zhang F W, Xu L L, Chen J S, Yu Y K, Niu Z C, Yin L Q. Chemical compositions and extinction coefficients of PM2.5 in peri-urban of Xiamen, China, during June 2009–May 2010. Atmospheric Research, 2012, 106: 150–158
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Zhao J P, Zhang F W, Xu Y, Chen J S, Yin L Q, Shang X S, Xu L L. Chemical characteristics of particulate matter during a heavy dust episode in a coastal city, Xiamen. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2011, 11: 299–308
[21]
Zhang X M. Source apportionment of inhalable particulates in air of Xiamen City. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 30(11): 51–69
[22]
Chen Y. Characterization of Cooking Fumes in Hong Kong. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 2007, 49–60
[23]
Huang R J, Zhang Y, Bozzetti C, Ho K F, Cao J J, Han Y, Daellenbach K R, Slowik J G, Platt S M, Canonaco F, Zotter P, Wolf R, Pieber S M, Bruns E A, Crippa M, Ciarelli G, Piazzalunga A, Schwikowski M, Abbaszade G, Schnelle-Kreis J, Zimmermann R, An Z, Szidat S, Baltensperger U, El Haddad I, Prévôt A S H. High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China. Nature, 2014, 514(7521): 218–222
Pubmed
[24]
Zhuang M Z. Research on chemical characteristics of Xiamen fine air particles. Modern Scientific Instruments, 2007, 5: 113–115(in Chinese)
[25]
Xiao Z M, Bi X H, Feng Y C, Wang Y Q, Zhou J, Fu X Q, Weng Y B. Source apportionment of ambient PM10 and PM2.5 in urban area of Ningbo City. Recearch of Environmental Science, 2012, 25(5): 549–555(in Chinese)
[26]
Chow J C, Watson J G, Kuhns H, Etyemezian V, Lowenthal D H, Crow D, Kohl S D, Engelbrecht J P, Green M C. Source profiles for industrial, mobile, and area sources in the Big Bend Regional Aerosol Visibility and Observational study. Chemosphere, 2004, 54(2): 185–208
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[27]
Watson J G, Chow J C, Houck J E. PM2.5 chemical source profiles for vehicle exhaust, vegetative burning, geological material, and coal burning in Northwestern Colorado during 1995. Chemsphere, 2001, 43(8): 1141–1151
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[28]
Yatkin S, Bayram A. Determination of major natural and anthropogenic source profiles for particulate matter and trace elements in Izmir, Turkey. Chemosphere, 2008, 71(4): 685–696
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[29]
Watson J G, Chow J C, Lowenthal D H, Pritchett L C, Frazier C A, Neuroth G R, Robbins R. Differences in the carbon composition of source profiles for diesel- and gasoline-powered vehicles. Atmospheric Environment, 1994 b, 28(15): 2493–2505
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Demirbas A. Potential applications of renewable energy sources biomass combustion problem in boiler power systerm and combustion related environmental issues. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2005, 31(2): 171–192
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Ni H Y, Han Y M, Cao J J, Chen A C, Tian J, Wang X L, Chow J C, Watson J G, Wang Q Y, Wang P, Li H, Huang R J. Emission characteristics of carbonaceous particles and trace gases from open burning of crop residues in China. Atomospheric Environment, 2015, 123(B): 399–406
[32]
Cao J J, Chow J C, Waston J G, Wu F, Han Y M, Jin Z D, Shen Z X, An Z S. Size-differentiated source profiles for fugitive dust in the Chinese Loess Plateau. Atmospheric Environment, 2008, 42(10): 2261–2275
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Ho K F, Lee S C, Chow J C, Waston J G. Characterization of PM10 and PM2.5 source profiles for fugitive dust in Hong Kong. Atmospheric Environment, 2003, 37(8): 1023–1032
CrossRef Google scholar
[34]
Zheng M, Salmon L G, Schauer J J, Zeng L M, Kiang C S, Zhang Y H, Cass G R. Seasonal trends in PM2.5 source contributions in Beijing, China. Atmospheric Environment, 2005, 39(22): 3967–3976
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Yu L D, Wang G F, Zhang R J, Zhang L M, Song Y, Wu B B, Li X F, An K, Chu J H. Characterization and source apportionment of PM2.5 in an urban environment in Beijing. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 2013, 13: 574–583

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Xiamen Environmental Protection Special Project (No. 19 (10), 2013), Science and Technology Project of Fujian Provincial Environmental Protection Department (2014), and also supported by a project from Ministry of Science and Technology (2013FY112700) and the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41673125).
Funding
 

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2016 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(497 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/