Removing ammonia from air with a constant pH, slightly acidic water　spray wet scrubber using recycled scrubbing solution

Abstract

Slightly acidic solutions are a practical means of removing ammonia from air

Scrubbed NH₃ accumulates in solution as NH₄⁺ and should be an excellent fertilizer

Increased air velocity decreased NH₃ removal and increased NH₄⁺ collection

Previous research on wet scrubbers has only studied highly acidic scrubbing solutions because of their high ammonia capture efficiencies; however, the high acidity created practical problems. Lower acidity solutions would reduce corrosion, maintenance, and cost; however, designers may need to use strategies for increasing scrubber effectiveness, such as using lower air velocities. The objective of this study was to determine if a spray scrubber with slightly acidic and higher pH scrubbing solution (pH from 2 to 8) could effectively remove NH₃ from NH₃ laden air (such as animal building exhaust air), and also collect this valuable resource for later use as a fertilizer. A bench-scale spray wet scrubber treated 20 ppmv NH₃/air mixture in a countercurrent contact chamber. First, the solution pH was varied from 2 to 8 while maintaining constant air velocity at 1.3 m·s⁻¹. Next, air velocity was increased (2 and 3 m·s⁻¹) while solution pH remained constant at pH6. At 1.3 m·s⁻¹, NH₃ removal efficiencies ranged between 49.0% (pH8) and 84.3% (pH2). This study has shown that slightly acidic scrubbing solutions are a practical means of removing ammonia from air especially if the scrubber is designed to increase collisions between solution droplets and NH₃ molecules. The NH₃ removed from the air was held in solution as NH₄⁺ and accumulates over time so the solution should be an excellent fertilizer.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Ammonia / Spray wet scrubber / Slightly acidic scrubbing solution / Controlled pH / Removal efficiency

References

[1] USDA. Poultry- Production and Value 2011 Summary. USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2012

[2] Gates R S, Casey K D, Wheeler E F, Xin H, Pescatore A J. US broiler housing ammonia emissions inventory. Atmospheric Environment, 2008, 42(14): 3342–3350

[3] Wheeler E F, Casey K D, Gates R S, Xin H, Zajaczkowski J L, Topper P A, Liang Y, Pescatore A J. Ammonia emissions from twelve U.S. broiler chicken houses. Transactions of the ASABE, 2006, 49(5): 1495–1512

[4] Miles D M, Branton S L, Lott B D. Atmospheric ammonia is detrimental to the performance of modern commercial broilers. Poultry Science, 2004, 83(10): 1650–1654

[5] Donham K J, Cumro D, Reynolds S. Synergistic effects of dust and ammonia on the occupational health effects of poultry production workers. Journal of Agromedicine, 2002, 8(2): 57–76

[6] Liang Y, Quan X, Chen J, Chung J S, Sung J Y, Chen S, Xue D, Zhao Y. Long-term results of ammonia removal and transformation by biofiltration. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2000, 80(1–3): 259–269

[7] Melse R W, Ogink N W M. Air scrubbing techniques for ammonia and odor reduction at livestock operations: review of on-farm research in the Netherlands. Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 2005, 48(6): 2303–2313

[8] Marsh L S, Gay S W, Van Wicklen G L. Performance evaluation of the Sanscent air scrubber for removal of dust, ammonia, and hydrogen sulfide from the exhaust air of a swine nursery. In: ASAE Paper No. 034052. St. Joseph, Mich: ASAE, 2003.

[9] Zhang Y, Polakow J A, Wang X, Riskowski G L, Sun Y, Ford S E. An aerodynamic deduster to reduce dust and gas emissions from ventilated livestock facilities. In Livestock Environment VI: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium. Kentucky, USA, 2001.

[10] Hadlocon L S, Manuzon R B, Zhao L Y. Optimization of ammonia absorption using acid spray wet scrubbers. Transactions of the ASABE, 2014, 57(2): 647–659

[11] Hadlocon L S, Zhao L Y, Manuzon R B, Elbatawi I E. An acid spray scrubber for recovery of ammonia emissions from a deep-pit swine facility. Transactions of the ASABE, 2014, 57(3): 949–960

[12] Zhao L Y, Riskowski G L, Stroot P, Robert M, Heber A J. Development of a wet scrubber to reduce dust and gas emissions from swine buildings. In ASAE Paper No. 014075. St. Joseph, Mich: ASAE, 2001.

[13] Aarnink A J A, Landman W J, Melse R W, Huynh T T T. Systems for eliminating pathogen exhaust air of animal houses. In: Livestock Environment VII, Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium. Beijing, China, 2005

[14] Manuzon R B, Zhao L Y, Keener H M, Darr M J. A prototype acid spray scrubber for absorbing ammonia emissions from exhaust fans of animal buildings. Transactions of the ASABE, 2007, 50(4): 1395–1407

[15] Ocfemia K, Zhang Y, Tan Z. Ammonia absorption in a vertical sprayer at low ammonia partial pressures. Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 2005, 48(4): 1561–1566

[16] Samani Majd A M, Kalbasi A, Riskowski G L, Muhhtar S, Zhao L Y, Fang W. Electrolyzed water spray scrubber for removing ammonia from air. Transactions of the ASABE, 2015, 58(4): 1069–1078

[17] Hadlocon L J, Manuzon R B, Zhao L. Development and evaluation of a full-scale spray scrubber for ammonia recovery and production of nitrogen fertilizer at poultry facilities. Environmental Technology, 2015, 36(1–4): 405–416

[18] Davies T H, Ip S Y. The droplet size and height effects in ammonia removal in a spray tower. Water Research, 1981, 15(5): 525–533

[19] ASHRAE. ANSI 41.2. ASHRAE 41.2: Standard Methods for Laboratory Airflow Measurment. Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE, 2001

[20] Samani Majd A M, Mukhtar S. Ammonia recovery enhancement using a tubular gas-permeable membrane system in laboratory and field-scale studies. Transactions of the ASABE, 2013, 56(5): 1951–1958

[21] APHA. Standard Methodes for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, 2005

[22] Hach. Sension, Ammonia Gas Sensing Combination Electrode.Colorado: Hach Company, Loveland, 2011

[23] . Hach. Sension, Gel-filled pH Electrode.Colorado: Hach Company, Loveland, 2011

[24] Zahn J A, Tung A E, Roberts B A, Hatfield J L. Abatement of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emissions from a swine lagoon using a polymer biocover. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2001, 51(4): 562–573

[25] Emerson K, Russo R C, Lund R E, Thurston R V. Aqueous ammonia equilibrium calculations: effect of pH and temperature. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 1975, 32(12): 2379–2383

[26] Environmental Protection Agency of United States. Aqueous ammonia equilibrium-tabulation of percent un-ionized ammonia. EPA-600/3–79–091, 1979

[27] Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 2009, 41(4): 1149–1160

[28] Samani Majd A M. Application of gas permable membranes for mitigation of ammonia gas from animal manure. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. College Station: Texas A&M University, 2015

[29] Hadlocon L S, Zhao L Y. Production of ammonium sulfate fertilizer using acid spray wet scrubbers. Agric. Eng. Int: CIGR Journal, 2015, 41–51

[30] Shi Q, Davidovits P, Jayne J T, Worsnop D R, Kolb C E. Uptake of gas-phase ammonia. 1. Uptake by aqueous surfaces as a function of pH. J. Phus. Chemical Analysis, 1999, 103: 8812–8823

[31] Swartz E, Shi Q, Davidovits P, Jayne J T, Worsnop D R, Kolb C E. Uptake of gas-phase ammonia. 2. Uptake by sulfuric acid surfaces. J. Phus. Chemical Analysis, 1999, 103: 8824–8833

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg