Removing ammonia from air with a constant pH, slightly acidic water spray wet scrubber using recycled scrubbing solution
Ahmad Kalbasi Ashtari, Amir M. Samani Majd, Gerald L. Riskowski, Saqib Mukhtar, Lingying Zhao
Removing ammonia from air with a constant pH, slightly acidic water spray wet scrubber using recycled scrubbing solution
Slightly acidic solutions are a practical means of removing ammonia from air
Scrubbed NH3 accumulates in solution as NH4+ and should be an excellent fertilizer
Increased air velocity decreased NH3 removal and increased NH4+ collection
Previous research on wet scrubbers has only studied highly acidic scrubbing solutions because of their high ammonia capture efficiencies; however, the high acidity created practical problems. Lower acidity solutions would reduce corrosion, maintenance, and cost; however, designers may need to use strategies for increasing scrubber effectiveness, such as using lower air velocities. The objective of this study was to determine if a spray scrubber with slightly acidic and higher pH scrubbing solution (pH from 2 to 8) could effectively remove NH3 from NH3 laden air (such as animal building exhaust air), and also collect this valuable resource for later use as a fertilizer. A bench-scale spray wet scrubber treated 20 ppmv NH3/air mixture in a countercurrent contact chamber. First, the solution pH was varied from 2 to 8 while maintaining constant air velocity at 1.3 m·s−1. Next, air velocity was increased (2 and 3 m·s−1) while solution pH remained constant at pH6. At 1.3 m·s−1, NH3 removal efficiencies ranged between 49.0% (pH8) and 84.3% (pH2). This study has shown that slightly acidic scrubbing solutions are a practical means of removing ammonia from air especially if the scrubber is designed to increase collisions between solution droplets and NH3 molecules. The NH3 removed from the air was held in solution as NH4+ and accumulates over time so the solution should be an excellent fertilizer.
Ammonia / Spray wet scrubber / Slightly acidic scrubbing solution / Controlled pH / Removal efficiency
[1] |
USDA. Poultry- Production and Value 2011 Summary. USDA, National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2012
|
[2] |
Gates R S, Casey K D, Wheeler E F, Xin H, Pescatore A J. US broiler housing ammonia emissions inventory. Atmospheric Environment, 2008, 42(14): 3342–3350
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
Wheeler E F, Casey K D, Gates R S, Xin H, Zajaczkowski J L, Topper P A, Liang Y, Pescatore A J. Ammonia emissions from twelve U.S. broiler chicken houses. Transactions of the ASABE, 2006, 49(5): 1495–1512
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Miles D M, Branton S L, Lott B D. Atmospheric ammonia is detrimental to the performance of modern commercial broilers. Poultry Science, 2004, 83(10): 1650–1654
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Donham K J, Cumro D, Reynolds S. Synergistic effects of dust and ammonia on the occupational health effects of poultry production workers. Journal of Agromedicine, 2002, 8(2): 57–76
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Liang Y, Quan X, Chen J, Chung J S, Sung J Y, Chen S, Xue D, Zhao Y. Long-term results of ammonia removal and transformation by biofiltration. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2000, 80(1–3): 259–269
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Melse R W, Ogink N W M. Air scrubbing techniques for ammonia and odor reduction at livestock operations: review of on-farm research in the Netherlands. Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 2005, 48(6): 2303–2313
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Marsh L S, Gay S W, Van Wicklen G L. Performance evaluation of the Sanscent air scrubber for removal of dust, ammonia, and hydrogen sulfide from the exhaust air of a swine nursery. In: ASAE Paper No. 034052. St. Joseph, Mich: ASAE, 2003.
|
[9] |
Zhang Y, Polakow J A, Wang X, Riskowski G L, Sun Y, Ford S E. An aerodynamic deduster to reduce dust and gas emissions from ventilated livestock facilities. In Livestock Environment VI: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium. Kentucky, USA, 2001.
|
[10] |
Hadlocon L S, Manuzon R B, Zhao L Y. Optimization of ammonia absorption using acid spray wet scrubbers. Transactions of the ASABE, 2014, 57(2): 647–659
|
[11] |
Hadlocon L S, Zhao L Y, Manuzon R B, Elbatawi I E. An acid spray scrubber for recovery of ammonia emissions from a deep-pit swine facility. Transactions of the ASABE, 2014, 57(3): 949–960
|
[12] |
Zhao L Y, Riskowski G L, Stroot P, Robert M, Heber A J. Development of a wet scrubber to reduce dust and gas emissions from swine buildings. In ASAE Paper No. 014075. St. Joseph, Mich: ASAE, 2001.
|
[13] |
Aarnink A J A, Landman W J, Melse R W, Huynh T T T. Systems for eliminating pathogen exhaust air of animal houses. In: Livestock Environment VII, Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium. Beijing, China, 2005
|
[14] |
Manuzon R B, Zhao L Y, Keener H M, Darr M J. A prototype acid spray scrubber for absorbing ammonia emissions from exhaust fans of animal buildings. Transactions of the ASABE, 2007, 50(4): 1395–1407
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Ocfemia K, Zhang Y, Tan Z. Ammonia absorption in a vertical sprayer at low ammonia partial pressures. Transactions of the ASAE. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 2005, 48(4): 1561–1566
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Samani Majd A M, Kalbasi A, Riskowski G L, Muhhtar S, Zhao L Y, Fang W. Electrolyzed water spray scrubber for removing ammonia from air. Transactions of the ASABE, 2015, 58(4): 1069–1078
|
[17] |
Hadlocon L J, Manuzon R B, Zhao L. Development and evaluation of a full-scale spray scrubber for ammonia recovery and production of nitrogen fertilizer at poultry facilities. Environmental Technology, 2015, 36(1–4): 405–416
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Davies T H, Ip S Y. The droplet size and height effects in ammonia removal in a spray tower. Water Research, 1981, 15(5): 525–533
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
ASHRAE. ANSI 41.2. ASHRAE 41.2: Standard Methods for Laboratory Airflow Measurment. Atlanta, GA: ASHRAE, 2001
|
[20] |
Samani Majd A M, Mukhtar S. Ammonia recovery enhancement using a tubular gas-permeable membrane system in laboratory and field-scale studies. Transactions of the ASABE, 2013, 56(5): 1951–1958
|
[21] |
APHA. Standard Methodes for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, 2005
|
[22] |
Hach. Sension, Ammonia Gas Sensing Combination Electrode.Colorado: Hach Company, Loveland, 2011
|
[23] |
. Hach. Sension, Gel-filled pH Electrode.Colorado: Hach Company, Loveland, 2011
|
[24] |
Zahn J A, Tung A E, Roberts B A, Hatfield J L. Abatement of ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emissions from a swine lagoon using a polymer biocover. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2001, 51(4): 562–573
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Emerson K, Russo R C, Lund R E, Thurston R V. Aqueous ammonia equilibrium calculations: effect of pH and temperature. Journal of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada, 1975, 32(12): 2379–2383
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Environmental Protection Agency of United States. Aqueous ammonia equilibrium-tabulation of percent un-ionized ammonia. EPA-600/3–79–091, 1979
|
[27] |
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A G. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 2009, 41(4): 1149–1160
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Samani Majd A M. Application of gas permable membranes for mitigation of ammonia gas from animal manure. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. College Station: Texas A&M University, 2015
|
[29] |
Hadlocon L S, Zhao L Y. Production of ammonium sulfate fertilizer using acid spray wet scrubbers. Agric. Eng. Int: CIGR Journal, 2015, 41–51
|
[30] |
Shi Q, Davidovits P, Jayne J T, Worsnop D R, Kolb C E. Uptake of gas-phase ammonia. 1. Uptake by aqueous surfaces as a function of pH. J. Phus. Chemical Analysis, 1999, 103: 8812–8823
|
[31] |
Swartz E, Shi Q, Davidovits P, Jayne J T, Worsnop D R, Kolb C E. Uptake of gas-phase ammonia. 2. Uptake by sulfuric acid surfaces. J. Phus. Chemical Analysis, 1999, 103: 8824–8833
|
/
〈 | 〉 |