A syntrophic propionate-oxidizing microflora and its bioaugmentation on anaerobic wastewater treatment for enhancing methane production and COD removal

Chong Liu, Jianzheng Li, Shuo Wang, Loring Nies

PDF(422 KB)
PDF(422 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2016, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (4) : 13. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-016-0856-8
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

A syntrophic propionate-oxidizing microflora and its bioaugmentation on anaerobic wastewater treatment for enhancing methane production and COD removal

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Syntrophic propionate-oxidizing microflora B83 was enriched from anaerobic sludge.

The bioaugmentation of microflora B83 were evaluated from wastewater treatment.

Methane yield and COD removal were enhanced by bioaugmentation of microflora B83.

Hydrogen-producing acetogensis was a rate-limiting step in methane fermentation.

Methane fermentation process can be restricted and even destroyed by the accumulation of propionate because it is the most difficult to be anaerobically oxidized among the volatile fatty acids produced by acetogenesis. To enhance anaerobic wastewater treatment process for methane production and COD removal, a syntrophic propionate-oxidizing microflora B83 was obtained from an anaerobic activated sludge by enrichment with propionate. The inoculation of microflora B83, with a 1:9 ratio of bacteria number to that of the activated sludge, could enhance the methane production from glucose by 2.5 times. With the same inoculation dosage of the microflora B83, COD removal in organic wastewater treatment process was improved from 75.6% to 86.6%, while the specific methane production by COD removal was increased by 2.7 times. Hydrogen-producing acetogenesis appeared to be a rate-limiting step in methane fermentation, and the enhancement of hydrogen-producing acetogens in the anaerobic wastewater treatment process had improved not only the hydrogen-producing acetogenesis but also the acidogenesis and methanogenesis.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

Anaerobic wastewater treatment / Methane production / Hydrogen-producing acetogenesis / Methanogenesis / Rate-limiting step / Bioaugmentation

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Chong Liu, Jianzheng Li, Shuo Wang, Loring Nies. A syntrophic propionate-oxidizing microflora and its bioaugmentation on anaerobic wastewater treatment for enhancing methane production and COD removal. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(4): 13 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-016-0856-8

References

[1]
Gunaseelan V N. Anaerobic digestion of biomass for methane production: a review. Biomass and Bioenergy, 1997, 13(1): 83–114
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Gou M, Zeng J, Wang H Z, Tang Y Q, Shigematsu T, Morimura S, Kida K. Microbial community structure and dynamics of starch-fed and glucose-fed chemostats during two years of continuous operation. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2016, 10(2): 368–380
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Nielsen H B, Uellendahl H, Ahring B K. Regulation and optimization of the biogas process: propionate as a key parameter. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2007, 31(11): 820–830
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Bhunia P, Ghangrekar M M. Statistical modeling and optimization of biomass granulation and COD removal in UASB reactors treating low strength wastewaters. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(10): 4229–4238
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[5]
Feng J, Wang Y L, Ji X Y, Yuan D Q, Li H. Performance and bioparticle growth of anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) fed with low-strength domestic sewage. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2015, 9(2): 352–364
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Öztürk M. Conversion of acetate, propionate and butyrate to methane under thermophilic conditions in batch reactors. Water Research, 1991, 25(12): 1509–1513
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Lange M, Ahring B K. A comprehensive study into the molecular methodology and molecular biology of methanogenic Archaea. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 2001, 25(5): 553–571
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[8]
Rajhi H, Puyol D, Martínez M C, Díaz E E, Sanz J L. Vacuum promotes metabolic shifts and increases biogenic hydrogen production in dark fermentation systems. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2016, 10(3): 513–521
[9]
Stams A J, Plugge C M, Mirna M C. Electron transfer in syntrophic communities of anaerobic bacteria and archaea. Nature Reviews. Microbiology, 2009, 7(8): 568–577
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[10]
Worm P, Stams A J M, Cheng X, Plugge C M. Growth- and substrate-dependent transcription of formate dehydrogenase and hydrogenase coding genes in Syntrophobacter fumaroxidans and Methanospirillum hungatei. Microbiology, 2011, 157(1): 280–289
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[11]
Zheng G, Li J, Zhao F, Zhang L, Wei L, Ban Q, Zhao Y. Effect of illumination on the hydrogen-production capability of anaerobic activated sludge. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2012, 6(1): 125–130
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Daniel S L, Keith E S, Yang H, Lin Y S, Drake H L. Utilization of methoxylated aromatic compounds by the acetogen Clostridium thermoaceticum: expression and specificity of the co-dependent O-demethylating activity. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1991, 180(1): 416–422
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[13]
Wang L, Zhou Q, Li F T. Avoiding propionic acid accumulation in the anaerobic process for biohydrogen production. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2006, 30(2): 177–182
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Gallert C, Winter J. Propionic acid accumulation and degradation during restart of a full-scale anaerobic biowaste digester. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(1): 170–178
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[15]
Mohan S V, Rao N C, Prasad K K, Sarma P N. Bioaugmentation of an anaerobic sequencing batch biofilm reactor (AnSBBR) with immobilized sulphate reducing bacteria (SRB) for the treatment of sulphate bearing chemical wastewater. Process Biochemistry, 2005, 40(8): 2849–2857
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Marone A, Massini G, Patriarca C, Signorini A, Varrone C, Izzo G. Hydrogen production from vegetable waste by bioaugmentation of indigenous fermentative communities. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2012, 37(7): 5612–5622
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
McInerney M J, Bryant M P. Anaerobic degradation of lactate by syntrophic associations of Methanosarcina barkeri and Desulfovibrio species and effect of H2 on acetate degradation. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1981, 41(2): 346–354
Pubmed
[18]
De Bok F A M, Plugge C M, Stams A J M. Interspecies electron transfer in methanogenic propionate degrading consortia. Water Research, 2004, 38(6): 1368–1375
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[19]
Friedrich M, Springer N, Ludwig W, Schink B. Phylogenetic positions of Desulfofustis glycolicus gen. nov., sp. nov., and Syntrophobotulus glycolicus gen. nov., sp. nov., two new strict anaerobes growing with glycolic acid. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 1996, 46(4): 1065–1069
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[20]
Sekiguchi Y, Kamagata Y, Nakamura K, Ohashi A, Harada H. Syntrophothermus lipocalidus gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel thermophilic, syntrophic, fatty-acid-oxidizing anaerobe which utilizes isobutyrate. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2000, 50(Pt 2): 771–779
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[21]
Bruns A, Cypionka H, Overmann J. Cyclic AMP and acyl homoserine lactones increase the cultivation efficiency of heterotrophic bacteria from the central Baltic Sea. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2002, 68(8): 3978–3987
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[22]
Schoenborn L, Yates P S, Grinton B E, Hugenholtz P, Janssen P H. Liquid serial dilution is inferior to solid media for isolation of cultures representative of the phylum-level diversity of soil bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2004, 70(7): 4363–4366
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[23]
Martins M, Faleiro M L, Barros R J, Veríssimo A R, Barreiros M A, Costa M C. Characterization and activity studies of highly heavy metal resistant sulphate-reducing bacteria to be used in acid mine drainage decontamination. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 166(2–3): 706–713
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[24]
Marchaim U, Krause C. Propionic to Acetic-acid ratios in overloaded anaerobic-digestion. Bioresource Technology, 1993, 43(3): 195–203
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Ahring B K, Sandberg M, Angelidaki I. Volatile fatty acids as indicators of process imbalance in anaerobic digestors. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 1995, 43(3): 559–565
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Van Lier J B, Martin J L S, Lettinga G. Effect of temperature on the anaerobic thermophilic conversion of volatile fatty acids by dispersed and granular sludge. Water Research, 1996, 30(1): 199–207
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Liu R R, Tian Q, Yang B, Chen J H. Hybrid anaerobic baffled reactor for treatment of desizing wastewater. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 2010, 7(1): 111–118
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Zhu G F, Li J Z, Wu P, Jin H Z, Wang Z. The performance and phase separated characteristics of an anaerobic baffled reactor treating soybean protein processing wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(17): 8027–8033
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[29]
Altaf M, Naveena B, Venkateshwar M, Kumar E V, Reddy G. Single step fermentation of starch to L(+) lactic acid by Lactobacillus amylophilus GV6 in SSF using inexpensive nitrogen sources to replace peptone and yeast extract–optimization by RSM. Process Biochemistry, 2006, 41(2): 465–472
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Turki S, Kraeim I B, Weeckers F, Thonart P, Kallel H. Isolation of bioactive peptides from tryptone that modulate lipase production in Yarrowia lipolytica. Process Biochemistry, 2006, 41(2): 465–472
[31]
Federation W E. American Public Health Association. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. American Public Health Association (APHA): Washington, D C, USA, 2005
[32]
Dubois M, Gilles K A, Hamilton J K, Rebers P, Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry, 1956, 28(3): 350–356
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Li J, Zheng G, He J, Chang S, Qin Z. Hydrogen-producing capability of anaerobic activated sludge in three types of fermentations in a continuous stirred-tank reactor. Biotechnology Advances, 2009, 27(5): 573–577
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[34]
Kalia A, Rattan A, Chopra P. A method for extraction of high-quality and high-quantity genomic DNA generally applicable to pathogenic bacteria. Analytical Biochemistry, 1999, 275(1): 1–5
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[35]
Angelidaki I, Alves M, Bolzonella D, Borzacconi L, Campos J L, Guwy A J, Kalyuzhnyi S, Jenicek P, van Lier J B. Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Science and Technology, 2009, 59(5): 927–934
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[36]
Pullammanappallil P C, Chynoweth D P, Lyberatos G, Svoronos S A. Stable performance of anaerobic digestion in the presence of a high concentration of propionic acid. Bioresource Technology, 2001, 78(2): 165–169
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[37]
Liu Y, Whitman W B. Metabolic, phylogenetic, and ecological diversity of the methanogenic archaea. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2008, 1125(1): 171–189
[38]
Hill D T, Cobb S A, Bolte J P. Using volatile fatty-acid relationships to predict anaerobic digester failure. Transactions of the ASAE (United States), 1987, 30(2): 496–501
[39]
Hill D T, Holmberg R D. Long chain volatile fatty acid relationships in anaerobic digestion of swine waste. Biological Wastes, 1988, 23(3): 195–214
CrossRef Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This work was supported financially by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 5148141), and the State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment (Harbin Institute of Technology) (No. 2016DX06).
Funding
 

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2016 Higher Education Press and Springer–Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(422 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/