Effect of protein on PVDF ultrafiltration membrane fouling behavior under different pH conditions: interface adhesion force and XDLVO theory analysis

Abstract

pH values of the BSA solution significantly impact the process of membrane fouling.

Dramatic flux decline is caused by membrane–BSA adhesion force at start of filtration.

XDLVO theory shows the polar or Lewis acid–base interaction plays a major role in membrane fouling.

To further determine the fouling behavior of bovine serum albumin (BSA) on different hydrophilic PVDF ultrafiltration (UF) membranes over a range of pH values, self-made atomic force microscopy (AFM) colloidal probes were used to detect the adhesion forces of membrane–BSA and BSA–BSA, respectively. Results showed that the membrane–BSA adhesion interaction was stronger than the BSA–BSA adhesion interaction, and the adhesion force between BSA–BSA-fouled PVDF/PVA membranes was similar to that between BSA–BSA-fouled PVDF/PVP membranes, which indicated that the fouling was mainly caused by the adhesion interaction between membrane and BSA. At the same pH condition, the PVDF/PVA membrane–BSA adhesion force was smaller than that of PVDF/PVP membrane–BSA, which illustrated that the more hydrophilic the membrane was, the better antifouling ability it had. The extended Derjaguin–Landau–Verwey–Overbeek (XDLVO) theory predicts that the polar or Lewis acid–base (AB) interaction played a dominant role in the interfacial free energy of membrane–BSA and BSA–BSA that can be affected by pH. For the same membrane, the pH values of a BSA solution can have a significant impact on the process of membrane fouling by changing the AB component of free energy.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

PVDF membrane / Membrane fouling / Adhesion force / Protein / Interfacial free energy

References

[1] Shannon M A, Bohn P W, Elimelech M, Georgiadis J G, Mariñas B J, Mayes A M. Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature, 2008, 452(7185): 301–310

[2] Wang L, Wang X. Study of membrane morphology by microscopic image analysis and membrane structure parameter model. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 283(1–2): 109–115

[3] Fan X, Tao Y, Wei D, Zhang X, Lei Y, Noguchi H. Removal of organic matter and disinfection by-products precursors in a hybrid process combining ozonation with ceramic membrane ultrafiltration. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2015, 9(1): 112–120

[4] Mo H, Tay K G, Ng H Y. Fouling of reverse osmosis membrane by protein (BSA): effects of pH, calcium, magnesium, ionic strength and temperature. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 315(1–2): 28–35

[5] Dong B, Chen Y, Gao N, Fan J. Effect of pH on UF membrane fouling. Desalination, 2006, 195(1–3): 201–208

[6] He H, Sui Q, Lu S, Zhao W, Qiu Z, Yu G. Effect of effluent organic matter on ozonation of bezafibrate. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2015, 9(6): 962–969

[7] Wang Q, Wang Z, Wu Z. Effects of solvent compositions on physicochemical properties and anti-fouling ability of PVDF microfiltration membranes for wastewater treatment. Desalination, 2012, 297: 79–86

[8] Chang H, Qu F, Liu B, Yu H, Li K, Shao S, Li G, Liang H. Hydraulic irreversibility of ultrafiltration membrane fouling by humic acid: effects of membrane properties and backwash water composition. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 493: 723–733

[9] Wang L, Miao R, Wang X, Lv Y, Meng X, Yang Y, Huang D, Feng L, Liu Z, Ju K. Fouling behavior of typical organic foulants in polyvinylidene fluoride ultrafiltration membranes: characterization from microforces. Environmental Science & Technology, 2013, 47(8): 3708–3714

[10] Ang W S, Elimelech M. Protein (BSA) fouling of reverse osmosis membranes: implications for wastewater reclamation. Journal of Membrane Science, 2007, 296(1–2): 83–92

[11] She Q, Tang C Y, Wang Y N, Zhang Z. The role of hydrodynamic conditions and solution chemistry on protein fouling during ultrafiltration. Desalination, 2009, 249(3): 1079–1087

[12] Wei L, Wang K, Kong X, Liu G, Cui S, Zhao Q, Cui F.Application of ultra-sonication, acid precipitation and membrane filtration for co-recovery of protein and humic acid from sewage sludge. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2016, 10(2), 327–335

[13] Velasco C, Calvo J, Palacio L, Carmona J, Prádanos P, Hernández A. Flux kinetics, limit and critical fluxes for low pressure dead-end microfiltration: the case of BSA filtration through a positively charged membrane. Chemical Engineering Science, 2015, 129: 58–68

[14] Ahmad B, Kamal M Z, Khan R H. Alkali-induced conformational transition in different domains of bovine serum albumin. Protein and Peptide Letters, 2004, 11(4): 307–315

[15] Ho C C, Zydney A L. A combined pore blockage and cake filtration model for protein fouling during microfiltration. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2000, 232(2): 389–399

[16] Duclos-Orsello C, Li W, Ho C C. A three mechanism model to describe fouling of microfiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 280(1–2): 856–866

[17] Sun X, Kanani D M, Ghosh R. Characterization and theoretical analysis of protein fouling of cellulose acetate membrane during constant flux dead-end microfiltration. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 320(1–2): 372–380

[18] Ma B, Hu C, Wang X, Xie Y, Jefferson W A, Liu H, Qu J. Effect of aluminum speciation on ultrafiltration membrane fouling by low dose aluminum coagulation with bovine serum albumin (BSA). Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 492: 88–94

[19] Mosley L M, Hunter K A, Ducker W A. Forces between colloid particles in natural waters. Environmental Science & Technology, 2003, 37(15): 3303–3308

[20] Zhang W, Stack A G, Chen Y. Interaction force measurement between E. coli cells and nanoparticles immobilized surfaces by using AFM. Colloids and Surfaces. B, Biointerfaces, 2011, 82(2): 316–324

[21] Hashino M, Hirami K, Ishigami T, Ohmukai Y, Maruyama T, Kubota N, Matsuyama H. Effect of kinds of membrane materials on membrane fouling with BSA. Journal of Membrane Science, 2011, 384(1–2): 157–165

[22] Miao R, Wang L, Wang X, Lv Y, Gao Z, Mi N, Liu T. Preparation of a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane material probe and its application in membrane fouling research. Desalination, 2015, 357: 171–177

[23] Derjaguin B. Theory of the stability of strongly charged lyophobic sols and the adhesion of strongly charged particles in solutions of electrolytes. Acta Physicochim. USSR, 1941, 14: 633–662

[24] Verwey E J. Theory of the stability of lyophobic colloids. Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1947, 51(3): 631–636

[25] Lin T, Lu Z, Chen W. Interaction mechanisms of humic acid combined with calcium ions on membrane fouling at different conditions in an ultrafiltration system. Desalination, 2015, 357: 26–35

[26] Meng X, Tang W, Wang L, Wang X, Huang D, Chen H, Zhang N. Mechanism analysis of membrane fouling behavior by humic acid using atomic force microscopy: effect of solution pH and hydrophilicity of PVDF ultrafiltration membrane interface. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 487: 180–188 doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2015.03.034

[27] Meng X, Zhang H, Wang L, Wang X, Zhao L. Membrane fouling by secondary effluent of urban sewage and the membrane properties. Environmental Sciences, 2013, 34(5): 1822–1827

[28] Brant J A, Childress A E. Assessing short-range membrane–colloid interactions using surface energetics. Journal of Membrane Science, 2002, 203(1–2): 257–273

[29] Subramani A, Hoek E M. Direct observation of initial microbial deposition onto reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 319(1–2): 111–125

[30] van Oss C J, Chaudhury M K, Good R J. Monopolar surfaces. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 1987, 28(1): 35–64

[31] Li J F, Xu Z L, Yang H. Microporous polyethersulfone membranes prepared under the combined precipitation conditions with non-solvent additives. Polymers for Advanced Technologies, 2008, 19(4): 251–257

[32] Feng C, Shi B, Li G, Wu Y. Preparation and properties of microporous membrane from poly (vinylidene fluoride-co-tetrafluoroethylene)(F2.4) for membrane distillation. Journal of Membrane Science, 2004, 237(1–2): 15–24

[33] Saikia D, Kumar A. Ionic conduction in P(VDF-HFP)/PVDF–(PC+ DEC)–LiClO₄ polymer gel electrolytes. Electrochimica Acta, 2004, 49(16): 2581–2589

[34] Wang Y N, Tang C Y. Fouling of nanofiltration, reverse osmosis, and ultrafiltration membranes by protein mixtures: the role of inter-foulant-species interaction. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(15): 6373–6379

[35] Miao R, Wang L, Lv Y, Wang X, Feng L, Liu Z, Huang D, Yang Y. Identifying polyvinylidene fluoride ultrafiltration membrane fouling behavior of different effluent organic matter fractions using colloidal probes. Water Research, 2014, 55: 313–322

Acknowledgements

Financial support for this study was provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51278408), the Shaanxi Province Science and Technology Innovation Projects (No. 2013KTCL03-16), Shaanxi Province Science and Technology Youth Star Project (Grant No. 2014KJXX-65) and the innovative research team of Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11783-016-0855-9 and is accessible for authorized users.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2016 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg