Chemical characteristics of fine particulate matter emitted from commercial cooking

Bing PEI , Hongyang CUI , Huan LIU , Naiqiang YAN

Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2016, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (3) : 559 -568.

PDF (485KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2016, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (3) : 559 -568. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-016-0829-y
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Chemical characteristics of fine particulate matter emitted from commercial cooking

Author information +
History +
PDF (485KB)

Abstract

The chemical characteristics of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) emitted from commercial cooking were explored in this study. Three typical commercial restaurants in Shanghai, i.e., a Shanghai-style one (SHS), a Sichuan-style one (SCS) and an Italian-style one (ITS), were selected to conduct PM2.5 sampling. Particulate organic matter (POM) was found to be the predominant contributor to cooking-related PM2.5 mass in all the tested restaurants, with a proportion of 69.1% to 77.1%. Specifically, 80 trace organic compounds were identified and quantified by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), which accounted for 3.8%–6.5% of the total PM2.5 mass. Among the quantified organic compounds, unsaturated fatty acids had the highest concentration, followed by saturated fatty acids. Comparatively, the impacts of other kinds of organic compounds were much smaller. Oleic acid was the most abundant single species in both SCS and ITS. However, in the case of SHS, linoleic acid was the richest one. ITS produced a much larger mass fraction of most organic species in POM than the two Chinese cooking styles except for monosaccharide anhydrides and sterols. The results of this study could be utilized to explore the contribution of cooking emissions to PM2.5 pollution and to develop the emission inventory of PM2.5 from cooking, which could then help the policy-makers design efficient treatment measures and control strategies on cooking emissions in the future.

Keywords

commercial cooking / PM2.5 / chemical characteristics / organic matter

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Bing PEI, Hongyang CUI, Huan LIU, Naiqiang YAN. Chemical characteristics of fine particulate matter emitted from commercial cooking. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 2016, 10(3): 559-568 DOI:10.1007/s11783-016-0829-y

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Lin L, He X C, Wu J P, Yu P G, Guo T T. Research of Shanghai cooking fume pollution. Environmental Science & Technology, 2014, 37(120): 546–549 (In Chinese)

[2]

Schauer J J, Rogge W F, Hildemann L M, Mazurek M A, Cass G R, Simoneit B R. Source apportionment of airborne particulate matter using organic compounds as tracers. Atmospheric Environment, 1996, 30(22): 3837–3855

[3]

Zheng M, Cass G R, Schauer J J, Edgerton E S. Source apportionment of PM2.5 in the Southeastern United States using solvent-extractable organic compounds as tracers. Environmental Science & Technology, 2002, 36(11): 2361–2371

[4]

Robinson A L, Subramanian R, Donahue N M, Bernardo-Bricker A, Rogge W F. Source apportionment of molecular markers and organic aerosol. 3. Food cooking emissions. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(24): 7820–7827

[5]

Abdullahi K L, Delgado-Saborit J M, Harrison R M. Emissions and indoor concentrations of particulate matter and its specific chemical components from cooking: A review. Atmospheric Environment, 2013, 71: 260–294

[6]

Abbey D E, Ostro B E, Petersen F, Burchette R J. Chronic respiratory symptoms associated with estimated long-term ambient concentrations of fine particulates less than 2.5 microns in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) and other air pollutants. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, 1995, 5(2): 137–159

[7]

Romieu I, Meneses F, Ruiz S, Sienra J J, Huerta J, White M C, Etzel R A. Effects of air pollution on the respiratory health of asthmatic children living in Mexico City. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1996, 154(2): 300–307

[8]

Lighty J S, Veranth J M, Sarofim A F. Combustion aerosols: factors governing their size and composition and implications to human health. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2000, 50(9): 1565–1622

[9]

Song Y, Zhang Y H, Xie S D, Zeng L M, Zheng M, Salmon L G, Shao M, Slanina S. Source apportionment of PM2.5 in Beijing by positive matrix factorization. Atmospheric Environment, 2006, 40(8): 1526–1537

[10]

Shu J, Dearing J A, Morse A P, Yu L, Yuan N. Determining the sources of atmospheric particles in Shanghai, China, from magnetic and geochemical properties. Atmospheric Environment, 2001, 35(15): 2615–2625

[11]

Zhang Y, Wang X, Chen H, Yang X, Chen J, Allen J O. Source apportionment of lead-containing aerosol particles in Shanghai using single particle mass spectrometry. Chemosphere, 2009, 74(4): 501–507

[12]

Schauer J J, Kleeman M J, Cass G R, Simoneit B R. Measurement of emissions from air pollution sources. 4. C1–C27 organic compounds from cooking with seed oils. Environmental Science & Technology, 2002, 36(4): 567–575

[13]

Rogge W F, Hildemann L M, Mazurek M A, Cass G R, Simoneit B R. Sources of fine organic aerosol. 1. Charbroilers and meat cooking operations. Environmental Science & Technology, 1991, 25(6): 1112–1125

[14]

Schauer J J, Kleeman M J, Cass G R, Simoneit B R. Measurement of emissions from air pollution sources. 1. C1 through C29 organic compounds from meat charbroiling. Environmental Science & Technology, 1999, 33(10): 1566–1577

[15]

McDonald J D, Zielinska B, Fujita E M, Sagebiel J C, Chow J C, Watson J G. Emissions from charbroiling and grilling of chicken and beef. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2003, 53(2): 185–194

[16]

See S W, Balasubramanian R. Chemical characteristics of fine particles emitted from different gas cooking methods. Atmospheric Environment, 2008, 42(39): 8852–8862

[17]

He L Y, Hu M, Huang X F, Yu B D, Zhang Y H, Liu D Q. Measurement of emissions of fine particulate organic matter from Chinese cooking. Atmospheric Environment, 2004, 38(38): 6557–6564

[18]

Zhao Y, Hu M, Slanina S, Zhang Y. Chemical compositions of fine particulate organic matter emitted from Chinese cooking. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(1): 99–105

[19]

Zhao Y, Hu M, Slanina S, Zhang Y. The molecular distribution of fine particulate organic matter emitted from Western-style fast food cooking. Atmospheric Environment, 2007, 41(37): 8163–8171

[20]

China National Environmental Monitoring Centre. Guidelines for Monitoring Methods of Ambient Air Particulate Matter Source Apportionment.Beijing: China National Environmental Monitoring Centre, 2014 (in Chinese).

[21]

Chow J C, Watson J G, Chen L W A, Chang M C, Robinson N F, Trimble D, Kohl S. The IMPROVE_A temperature protocol for thermal/optical carbon analysis: maintaining consistency with a long-term database. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2007, 57(9): 1014–1023

[22]

Gu Z, Feng J, Han W, Wu M, Fu J, Sheng G. Characteristics of organic matter in PM2.5 from an e-waste dismantling area in Taizhou, China. Chemosphere, 2010, 80(7): 800–806

[23]

Mattson F H, Lutton E S. The specific distribution of fatty acids in the glycerides of animal and vegetable fats. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1958, 233(4): 868–871

[24]

Simoneit B R, Mazurek M A. Organic matter of the troposphere—II. Natural background of biogenic lipid matter in aerosols over the rural western United States. Atmospheric Environment, 1982, 16(9): 2139–2159

[25]

Simoneit B R. Biomass burning—A review of organic tracers for smoke from incomplete combustion. Applied Geochemistry, 200217(3): 129–162

[26]

van Drooge B L, Ballesta P P. Seasonal and daily source apportionment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentrations in PM10 in a semirural European area. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(19): 7310–7316

[27]

Gao B, Guo H, Wang X M, Zhao X Y, Ling Z H, Zhang Z, Liu T Y. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in PM2.5 in Guangzhou, southern China: spatiotemporal patterns and emission sources. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2012, 239–240: 78–87

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF (485KB)

3863

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/