Influencing mechanism of high solid concentration on anaerobic mono-digestion of sewage sludge without agitation

Abstract

High-solids anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge was a promising process, but high solid concentration negatively influenced methane production. The influencing mechanism was systematically analyzed in this study through a series of static anaerobic digestion experiments at total solids (TS) contents of 3%–15%. The results showed that TS 6% was the boundary between low-solids and high-solids anaerobic digestion, and the accumulative methane yield decreased exponentially when TS increased from 6% to 15%. The performance of anaerobic digestion was directly determined by the efficiency of mass transfer, and the relation between methane yield and sludge diffusive coefficients was well described by a power function. Thus, the increasing TS resulted in an exponential increase in sludge viscosity but an exponential decrease in diffusive coefficient. The blocked mass transfer led to the accumulation of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and free ammonia. Acetic metabolism was the main process, whereas butyric and propionic metabolisms occurred at the initial stage of high-solids anaerobic digestion. The concentration of VFAs reached the maximum at the initial stage, which were still lower than the threshold influencing methanogens. The concentration of free ammonia increased gradually, and the methanogenesis was inhibited when free ammonia nitrogen exceeded 50 mg·L⁻¹. Consequently, the deterioration of high-solids anaerobic digestion was related to the blocked mass transfer and the resulting ammonia accumulation.

Keywords

anaerobic digestion / methane / sewage sludge / volatile fatty acids / free ammonia

References

[1] Li F, Lei T, Zhang Y P, Wei J Z, Yang Y. Preparation, characterization of sludge adsorbent and investigations on its removal of hydrogen sulfide under room temperature. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2015, 9(2): 190–196

[2] Yang Y, Li H, Li J. Variation in humic and fulvic acids during thermal sludge treatment assessed by size fractionation, elementary analysis and spectroscopic methods. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2014, 8(6): 854–862

[3] Pantaleo A, Gennaro B D, Shah N. Assessment of optimal size of anaerobic co-digestion plants: an application to cattle farms in the province of Bari (Italy). Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 20: 57–70

[4] Chang S, Li J Z, Liu F, Yu Z. Effect of different gas releasing methods on anaerobic fermentative hydrogen production in batch cultures. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2012, 6(6): 901–906

[5] Appels L, Baeyens J, Degrève J, Dewil R. Principles and potential of the anaerobic digestion of waste-activated sludge. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2008, 34(6): 755–781

[6] Jolis D. High-solids anaerobic digestion of municipal sludge pretreated by thermal hydrolysis. Water Environment Research, 2008, 80(7): 654–662

[7] Duan N, Dong B, Wu B, Dai X. High-solid anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge under mesophilic conditions: feasibility study. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 104: 150–156

[8] Bolzonella D, Pavan P, Battistoni P, Cecchi F. Mesophilic anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge: influence of the solid retention time in the wastewater treatment process. Process Biochemistry, 2005, 40(3−4): 1453–1460

[9] Bolzonella D, Innocenti L, Cecchi F. Biological nutrient removal wastewater treatments and sewage sludge anaerobic mesophilic digestion performances. Water Science and Technology, 2002, 46(10): 199–208

[10] Guendouz J, Buffière P, Cacho J, Carrère M, Delgenes J P. High-solids anaerobic digestion: comparison of three pilot scales. Water Science and Technology, 2008, 58(9): 1757–1763

[11] Karthikeyan O P, Visvanathan C. Bio-energy recovery from high-solid organic substrates by dry anaerobic bio-conversion processes: a review. Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology, 2013, 12(3): 257–284

[12] Liao X, Li H, Cheng Y, Chen N, Li C, Yang Y. Process performance of high-solids batch anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Environmental Technology, 2014, 35(21−24): 2652–2659

[13] Liao X, Li H. Biogas production from low-organic-content sludge using a high-solids anaerobic digester with improved agitation. Applied Energy, 2015, 148: 252–259

[14] Zhou Y, Takaoka M, Wang W, Liu X, Oshita K. Effect of thermal hydrolysis pre-treatment on anaerobic digestion of municipal biowaste: a pilot scale study in China. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2013, 116(1): 101–105

[15] Bollon J, Benbelkacem H, Gourdon R, Buffière P. Measurement of diffusion coefficients in dry anaerobic digestion media. Chemical Engineering Science, 2013, 89: 115–119

[16] Lay J J, Li Y Y, Noike T, Endo J, Ishimoto S. Analysis of environmental factors affecting methane production from high solids organic waste. Water Science and Technology, 1997, 36(6−7): 493–500

[17] Forster-Carneiro T, Pérez M, Romero L I. Influence of total solid and inoculum contents on performance of anaerobic reactors treating food waste. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(15): 6994–7002

[18] Fernández J, Pérez M, Romero L I. Kinetics of mesophilic anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste: Influence of initial total solid concentration. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(16): 6322–6328

[19] Chen X, Yan W, Sheng K, Sanati M. Comparison of high-solids to liquid anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and green waste. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 154: 215–221

[20] Abbassi-Guendouz A, Brockmann D, Trably E, Dumas C, Delgenès J P, Steyer J P, Escudié R. Total solids content drives high solid anaerobic digestion via mass transfer limitation. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 111: 55–61

[21] Motte J C, Trably E, Escudiè R, Hamelin J, Steyer J P, Bernet N, Delgenes J P, Dumas C. Total solids content: a key parameter of metabolic pathways in dry anaerobic digestion. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2013, 6(1): 164

[22] Fujishima S, Miyahara T, Noike T. Effect of moisture content on anaerobic digestion of dewatered sludge: ammonia inhibition to carbohydrate removal and methane production. Water Science and Technology, 2000, 41(3): 119–127

[23] Owen W F, Stuckey D C, Healy J B Jr, Young L Y, McCarty P L. Bioassay for monitoring biochemical methane potential and anaerobic toxicity. Water Research, 1979, 13(6): 485–492

[24] Lopes W S, Leite V D, Prasad S. Optimization of inoculum to substrate ratio for bio-energy generation in co-digestion of tannery solid wastes. Bioresource Technology, 2004, 94: 261–266

[25] China Ministry of Environmental Protection (MEP). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 4th ed. Beijing: China Environmental Publishing, 2002

[26] Hansen K H, Angelidaki I, Ahring B K. Anaerobic digestion of swine manure: inhibition by ammonia. Water Research, 1998, 32(1): 5–12

[27] Squires T M, Brady J F. A simple paradigm for active and nonlinear microrheology. Physics of Fluids, 2005, 17(7): 073101

[28] Guo X M, Trably E, Latrille E, Carrère H, Steyer J P. Hydrogen production from agricultural waste by dark fermentation: a review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(19): 10660–10673

[29] van Ginkel S, Logan B E. Inhibition of biohydrogen production by undissociated acetic and butyric acids. Environmental Science & Technology, 2005, 39(23): 9351–9356

[30] Barredo M S, Evison L M. Effect of propionate toxicity on methanogen-enriched sludge, Methanobrevibacter smithii, and Methanospirillum hungatii at different pH values. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1991, 57(6): 1764–1769

[31] Wang Z, Xu F, Li Y. Effects of total ammonia nitrogen concentration on solid-state anaerobic digestion of corn stover. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 144: 281–287

[32] de Baere L A, Devocht M, Vanassche P, Verstraete W. Influence of high NaCl and NH₄Cl salt levels on methanogenic associations. Water Research, 1984, 18(5): 543–548

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Major Science and Technology Program for Water Pollution Control and Treatment of China (No. 2011ZX07302), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51478239), and Shenzhen Science and Technology Research and Development Fund (No. JSGG20130918153404812).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg