Nexus between polymer support and metal oxide nanoparticles in hybrid nanosorbent materials (HNMs) for sorption/desorption of target ligands

Abstract

Metal oxide nanoparticles like hydrated ferric oxide (HFO) or hydrated zirconium oxide (HZrO) are excellent sorbents for environmentally significant ligands like phosphate, arsenic, or fluoride, present at trace concentrations. Since the sorption capacity is surface dependent for HFO and HZrO, nanoscale sizes offer significant enhancement in performance. However, due to their miniscule sizes, low attrition resistance, and poor durability they are unable to be used in typical plug-flow column setups. Meanwhile ion exchange resins, which have no specific affinity toward anionic ligands, are durable and chemically stable. By impregnating metal oxide nanoparticles inside a polymer support, with or without functional groups, a hybrid nanosorbent material (HNM) can be prepared. A HNM is durable, mechanically strong, and chemically stable. The functional groups of the polymeric support will affect the overall removal efficiency of the ligands exerted by the Donnan Membrane Effect. For example, the removal of arsenic by HFO or the removal of fluoride by HZrO is enhanced by using anion exchange resins. The HNM can be precisely tuned to remove one type of contaminant over another type. Also, the physical morphology of the support material, spherical bead versus ion exchange fiber, has a significant effect on kinetics of sorption and desorption. HNMs also possess dual sorption sites and are capable of removing multiple contaminants, namely, arsenate and perchlorate, concurrently.

Keywords

ion exchange / sorption / arsenic / perchlorate / fluoride

References

[1] Trivedi P, Axe L. Modeling Cd and Zn sorption to hydrous metal oxides. Environmental Science & Technology, 2000, 34(11): 2215–2223

[2] Trivedi P, Axe L. Predicting divalent metal sorption to hydrous Al, Fe, and Mn oxides. Environmental Science & Technology, 2001, 35(9): 1779–1784

[3] Dixit S, Hering J G. Comparison of arsenic(V) and arsenic(III) sorption onto iron oxide minerals: implications for arsenic mobility. Environmental Science & Technology, 2003, 37(18): 4182–4189

[4] Dou X, Mohan D, Pittman C U Jr, Yang S. Remediating fluoride from water using hydrous zirconium oxide. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2012, 198−199: 236–245

[5] Li Z, Deng S, Zhang X, Zhou W, Huang J, Yu G. Removal of fluoride from water using titanium-based adsorbents. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 2010, 4(4): 414–420

[6] Xu W, Wang J, Wang L, Sheng G, Liu J, Yu H, Huang X J. Enhanced arsenic removal from water by hierarchically porous CeO₂-ZrO₂ nanospheres: role of surface- and structure-dependent properties. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2013, 260: 498–507

[7] Zheng J, Chen K H, Yan X, Chen S J, Hu G C, Peng X W, Yuan J G, Mai B X, Yang Z Y. Heavy metals in food, house dust, and water from an e-waste recycling area in South China and the potential risk to human health. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2013, 96: 205–212

[8] Wongsasuluk P, Chotpantarat S, Siriwong W, Robson M. Heavy metal contamination and human health risk assessment in drinking water from shallow groundwater wells in an agricultural area in Ubon Ratchathani province, Thailand. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2014, 36(1): 169–182

[9] Rahman M M, Ng J C, Naidu R. Chronic exposure of arsenic via drinking water and its adverse health impacts on humans. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2009, 31(S1 Suppl 1): 189–200

[10] Greer M A, Goodman G, Pleus R C, Greer S E. Health effects assessment for environmental perchlorate contamination: the dose response for inhibition of thyroidal radioiodine uptake in humans. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2002, 110(9): 927–937

[11] Wambu E W, Agong S G, Anyango B, Akuno W, Akenga T. High fluoride water in Bondo-Rarieda area of Siaya County, Kenya: a hydro-geological implication on public health in the Lake Victoria Basin. BMC Public Health, 2014, 14(1): 462–469

[12] Jang M, Chen W, Cannon F S. Preloading hydrous ferric oxide into granular activated carbon for arsenic removal. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(9): 3369–3374

[13] Min J H, Hering J G. Arsenate sorption by Fe(III)-doped alginate gels. Water Research, 1998, 32(5): 1544–1552

[14] Zouboulis A I, Katsoyiannis I A. Arsenic removal using iron oxide loaded alginate beads. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2002, 41(24): 6149–6155

[15] Miller S M, Zimmerman J B. Novel, bio-based, photoactive arsenic sorbent: TiO₂-impregnated chitosan bead. Water Research, 2010, 44(19): 5722–5729

[16] DeMarco M J, SenGupta A K, Greenleaf J E. Arsenic removal using a polymeric/inorganic hybrid sorbent. Water Research, 2003, 37(1): 164–176

[17] Cumbal L, Sengupta A K. Arsenic removal using polymer-supported hydrated iron(III) oxide nanoparticles: role of donnan membrane effect. Environmental Science & Technology, 2005, 39(17): 6508–6515

[18] Padungthon S, Li J, German M, SenGupta A K. Hybrid anion exchanger with dispersed zirconium oxide nanoparticles: a durable and reusable fluoride-selective sorbent. Environmental Engineering Science, 2014, 31(7): 360–372

[19] Pan B, Qiu H, Pan B, Nie G, Xiao L, Lv L, Zhang W, Zhang Q, Zheng S. Highly efficient removal of heavy metals by polymer-supported nanosized hydrated Fe(III) oxides: behavior and XPS study. Water Research, 2010, 44(3): 815–824

[20] Zhang Q, Pan B, Zhang W, Pan B, Zhang Q, Ren H. Arsenate removal from aqueous media by nanosized hydrated ferric oxide (HFO)-loaded polymeric sorbents: effect of HFO loadings. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2008, 47(11): 3957–3962

[21] Zhao D, SenGupta A K. Selective removal and recovery of phosphate in a novel fixed-bed process. Water Science and Technology, 1996, 33(10−11): 139–147

[22] Puttamraju P, SenGupta A K. Evidence of tunable on-off sorption behaviors of metal oxide nanoparticles: role of ion exchanger support. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2006, 45(22): 7737–7742

[23] Smith R C, SenGupta A K. Integrating tunable anion exchange with reverse osmosis for enhanced recovery during inland brackish water desalination. Environmental Science & Technology, 2015, 49(9): 5637–5644

[24] Greenleaf J E, Cumbal L, Staina I, SenGupta A K. Abiotic As(III) oxidation by hydrated Fe(III) oxide (HFO) microparticles in a plug flow columnar configuration. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2003, 81(2): 87–98

[25] Li P, SenGupta A K. Sorption of hydrophobic ionizable organic compounds (HIOCs) onto polymeric ion exchangers. Reactive & Functional Polymers, 2004, 60: 27–39

[26] Sarkar S, SenGupta A K, Prakash P. The Donnan membrane principle: opportunities for sustainable engineered processes and materials. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(4): 1161–1166

[27] Donnan F G. Theory of membrane equilibria and membrane potentials in the presence of non-dialysing electrolytes. A contribution to physical-chemical physiology. Journal of Membrane Science, 1995, 100(1): 45–55

[28] Li P, SenGupta A K. Intraparticle diffusion during selective ion exchange with a macroporous exchanger. Reactive & Functional Polymers, 2000, 44(3): 273–287

[29] Sarkar S, Blaney L M, Gupta A, Ghosh D, SenGupta A K. Use of ArsenXnp, a hybrid anion exchanger, for arsenic removal in remote villages in the Indian subcontinent. Reactive & Functional Polymers, 2007, 67(12): 1599–1611

[30] SenGupta A K, Cumbal L H. Hybrid anion exchanger for selective removal of contaminating ligands from fluids and method of manufacture thereof. US Patent, 7 291 578, 2007−<month>11</month>−<day>6</day>

[31] SenGupta A K, Padungthon S. Hybrid anion exchanger impregnated with hydrated zirconium oxide for selective removal of contaminating ligand and methods of manufacture and use thereof. US Patent Application, 860 984, 2013−<month>10</month>−<day>17</day>

[32] Tang Y, Guan X, Wang J, Gao N, McPhail M R, Chusuei C C. Fluoride adsorption onto granular ferric hydroxide: effects of ionic strength, pH, surface loading, and major co-existing anions. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 171(1−<?Pub Caret?>3): 774–779

[33] American Public Health Association. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th Edition. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, 1992

Acknowledgements

This research was partially funded by the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania through its Pennsylvania Infrastructure Technology Alliance (PITA) program, Venture Well, and the Global Innovation Initiative (GII) grant from the US Department of State.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg