A photolysis coefficient for characterizing the response of aqueous constituents to photolysis
David R. HOKANSON, Ke LI, R. Rhodes TRUSSELL
A photolysis coefficient for characterizing the response of aqueous constituents to photolysis
UV photolysis and UV based advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) are gaining more and more attention for drinking water treatment. Quantum yield () and molar absorption coefficient () are the two critical parameters measuring the effectiveness of photolysis of a compound. The product of the two was proposed as a fundamental measure of a constituent’s amenability to transformation by photolysis. It was shown that this product, named the photolysis coefficient, , can be determined using standard bench tests and captures the properties that govern a constituent’s transformation when exposed to light. The development showed the photolysis coefficient to be equally useful for microbiological, inorganic and organic constituents. Values of calculated by the authors based on quantum yield and molar absorption coefficient data from the literature were summarized. Photolysis coefficients among microorganisms ranged from 8500 to more than 600000 and are far higher than for inorganic and organic compounds, which varied over a range of approximately 10 to 1000 and are much less sensitive to UV photolysis than the microorganisms.
UV photolysis / disinfection / advanced oxidation / N-nitrosodimethylamine / quantum yield / absorption coefficient
[1] |
Glaze W H, Kang J W, Chapin D H. Chemistry of water treatment processes involving ozone, hydrogen peroxide and ultraviolet radiation. Ozone Science and Engineering, 1987, 9(4): 335–352
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Bolton J R. Ultraviolet Applications Handbook, 3rd ed. Edmonton, Canada: Bolton Photosciences, Inc., 2010
|
[3] |
Li K, Hokanson D R, Crittenden J C, Trussell R R, Minakata D. Evaluating UV/H2O2 processes for methyl tert-butyl ether and tertiary butyl alcohol removal: effect of pretreatment options and light sources. Water Research, 2008, 42(20): 5045–5053
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Li K, Stefan M I, Crittenden J C. UV photolysis of trichloroethylene (TCE): product study and kinetic modeling. Environmental Science & Technology, 2004, 38(24): 6685–6693
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Setlow R B. Cyclobutane-type pyrimidine dimers in polynucleotides. Science, 1966, 153(3734): 379–386
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Oguma K, Katayama H, Mitani H, Morita S, Hirata T, Ohgaki S. Determination of pyrimidine dimers in escherichia coli and cryptosporidium parvum during UV light inactivation, photoreactivation, and dark repair. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2001, 67(10): 4630–4637
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Radany E H, Love J D, Friedberg E C. The use of direct photoreversal of UV-irradiated DNA for the demonstration of pyrimidine dimer-DNA glycosylase activity. In: Seeberg E, Kleppe K, eds. Chromosome Damage and Repair. New York, N.Y.: Plenum Publishing Corp., 1981, 91–95
|
[8] |
Einstein A. Über einen die erzeugung und verwandlung des lichtes betreffenden heuristischen gesichtspunkt. Annalen der Physik, 1905, 17(6): 132–148
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Rubin M B, Braslavsky S E. Quantum yield: the term and the symbol. A historical search. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences, 2010, 9(5): 670–674
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Bolton J R, Stefan M I. Fundamental photochemical approach to the concepts of fluence (UV dose) and electrical energy efficiency in photochemical degradation reactions. Research on Chemical Intermediates, 2002, 28(7–9): 857–870
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Bolton J R, Linden K G. Standardization of methods for fluence (UV Dose) determination in bench-scale UV experiments. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2003, 129(3): 209–215
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Schwarzenbach R P, Gschwend P M, Imboden D M. Environmental Organic Chemistry, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ.: Wiley, 2003
|
[13] |
Hijnen W A M, Beerendonk E F, Medema G J. Inactivation credit of UV radiation for viruses, bacteria and protozoan (oo)cysts in water: a review. Water Research, 2006, 40(1): 3–22
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Havelaar A H, Meulemans C C E, Pot-Hodgeboom W M, Koster J. Inactivation of bacteriophage MS2 in wastewater effluent with monochromatic and polychromatic ultraviolet light. Water Research, 1990, 24(11): 1387–1393
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Sharpless C M, Seibold D A, Linden K G. Nitrate photosensitized degradation of atrazine during UV water treatment. Aquatic Sciences, 2003, 65(4): 359–366
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Watts M J, Linden K G. Chlorine photolysis and subsequent OH radical production during UV treatment of chlorinated water. Water Research, 2007, 41(13): 2871–2878
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Li J, Blatchley E R III. UV photodegradation of inorganic chloramines. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(1): 60–65
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
De Laat J, Berne F. La déchloramination des eaux de piscines par irradiation UV. European Journal of Water Quality, 2009, 40(2): 129–149
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
De Laat J, Boudiaf N, Dossier-Berne F. Effect of dissolved oxygen on the photodecomposition of monochloramine and dichloramine in aqueous solution by UV irradiation at 253.7 nm. Water Research, 2010, 44(10): 3261–3269
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Lukes P, Clupek M, Babicky V, Sunka P.Ultraviolet radiation from the pulsed corona discharge in water. Plasma Sources Science and Technology, 2008, 17(2): 1–11, article no. 024012
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Sanches S, Barreto Crespo M T, Pereira V J. Drinking water treatment of priority pesticides using low pressure UV photolysis and advanced oxidation processes. Water Research, 2010, 44(6): 1809–1818
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[22] |
Baeza C, Knappe D R U. Transformation kinetics of biochemically active compounds in low-pressure UV photolysis and UV/H2O2 advanced oxidation processes. Water Research, 2011, 45(15): 4531–4543
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[23] |
Pereira V J, Weinberg H S, Linden K G, Singer P C. UV degradation kinetics and modeling of pharmaceutical compounds in laboratory grade and surface water via direct and indirect photolysis at 254 nm. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(5): 1682–1688
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[24] |
Yuan F, Hu C, Hu X, Qu J, Yang M. Degradation of selected pharmaceuticals in aqueous solution with UV and UV H2O2. Water Research, 2009, 43(6): 1766–1774
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[25] |
Rauth A M. The physical state of viral nucleic acid and the sensitivity of viruses to ultraviolet light. Biophysical Journal, 1965, 5(3): 257–273
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[26] |
Stefan M I, Bolton J R. UV direct photolysis of N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA): kinetic and product study. Helvetica Chimica Acta, 2002, 85(5): 1416–1426
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[27] |
Sharpless C M, Linden K G. Experimental and model comparisons of low- and medium-pressure Hg lamps for the direct and H2O2 assisted UV photodegradation of N-nitrosodimethylamine in simulated drinking water. Environmental Science & Technology, 2003, 37(9): 1933–1940
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
/
〈 | 〉 |