Simple model of sludge thickening process in secondary settlers

Abstract

In wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), a secondary settler acts as a clarifier, sludge thickener, and sludge storage tank during peak flows and therefore plays an important role in the performance of the activated sludge process. Sludge thickening occurs in the lower portions of secondary clarifiers during their operation. In this study, by detecting the hindered zone from the complete thickening process of activated sludge, a simple model for the sludge thickening velocity, {\mathit{u}}_{\mathit{s}}=\mathit{a}{\mathit{X}}^{\mathit{b}}(\mathit{a}\mathit{=}0.9925{\mathit{S}\mathit{S}\mathit{V}\mathit{I}}_{3.5},\mathit{b}=-3.541\mathrm{l}\mathrm{n}\left(\mathit{S}\mathit{S}\mathit{V}{\mathit{I}}_{3.5}\right)+12.973), describing the potential and performance of activated sludge thickening in the hindered zone was developed. However, sludge thickening in the compression zone was not studied because sludge in the compression zone showed limited thickening. This empirical model was developed using batch settling data obtained from four WWTPs and validated using measured data from a fifth WWTP to better study sludge thickening. To explore different sludge settling and thickening mechanisms, the curves of sludge thickening and sludge settling were compared. Finally, it was found that several factors including temperature, stirring, initial depth, and polymer conditioning can lead to highly concentrated return sludge and biomass in a biologic reactor.

Keywords

wastewater treatment plants / secondary settler / sludge thickening / sludge settling / hindered zone

References

[1] Coe H S, Clevenger G H. Methods for determining the capacities of slime settling tanks. Transactions of the American Institute of Mining, Metallurgical and Petroleum Engineers, 1916, 55: 356–384

[2] Kynch G J. A theory of sedimentation. Transactions of the Faraday Society, 1952, 48: 166–176

[3] Shannon P T, Stroupe E, Tory E M. Batch and continuous thickening. Basic theory. Solids flux for rigid spheres. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, 1963, 2(3): 203–211

[4] Yoshioka N, Hotta Y, Tanaka S, Naito S, Tsugami S. Continuous thickening of homogeneous flocculated slurries. Chemical Engineering Tokyo, 1957, 21(2): 66–74

[5] Kalinske A A. Settling characteristics of suspensions in water treatment processes. Journal–American Water Works Association, 1948, 40(2): 113–120

[6] Vesilind P A. Design of prototype thickeners from batch settling tests. Water Sewage Works, 1968, 115(7): 302–307 

[7] Brown J C, La Motta E. Physical behavior of flocculent suspensions in upflow. Journal of the Sanitary Engineering Division, 1971, 97(2): 209–224

[8] Takács I, Patry G G, Nolasco D. A dynamic model of the clarification-thickening process. Water Research, 1991, 25(10): 1263–1271

[9] Cho S H, Colin F, Sardin M, Prost C. Settling velocity model of activated sludge. Water Research, 1993, 27(7): 1237–1242

[10] Daigger G T. Development of refined clarifier operating diagrams using an updated settling characteristics database. Water Environment Research, 1995, 67(1): 95–100

[11] Ozinsky A E, Ekama G A. Secondary settling tank modelling and design Part 2: Linking sludge settleability measures. Water SA, 1995, 21(4): 333–349

[12] Forster C F. A further examination of mass flux theory as applied to activated sludge settlement. Biotechnology Letters, 1982, 4(6): 381–386

[13] Daigger G T, Roper R E Jr. The relationship between SVI and activated sludge settling characteristics. Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation, 1985, 57(8): 859–866

[14] Koopman B, Cadee K. Prediction of thickening capacity using diluted sludge volume index. Water Research, 1983, 17(10): 1427–1431

[15] Wahlberg E J, Keinath T M. Development of settling flux curves using SVI: An addendum. Water Environment Research, 1995, 67(5): 872–874

[16] Li Z L. One-dimensional flux model for the secondary settling tanks and its application. Dissertation for the Master Degree. Chongqing: Chongqing University, 2006 (in Chinese)

[17] Wahlberg E J, Keinath T M. Development of settling flux curves using SVI. Journal - Water Pollution Control Federation, 1988, 60(12): 2095–2100

[18] Ekama G A, Barnard J L, Günthert F W, Krebs P, McCorquodale J A, Parker D S, Wahlberg E J. Secondary Settling Tanks: Theory, Modelling, Design and Operation. London: International Association on Water Quality, 1997, 187–203

[19] Göhle F, Finnson A, Hultman B. Dynamic simulation of sludge blanket movements in a full-scale rectangular sedimentation basin. Water Science and Technology, 1996, 33(1): 89–99

[20] Härtel L, Pöpel H J. A dynamic secondary clarifier model including processes of sludge thickening. Water Science and Technology, 1992, 25(6): 267–284

[21] Dick R I, Vesilind P A. The sludge volume index–What is it? Journal- Water Pollution Control Federation, 1969, 41(7): 1285–1291

[22] White M J D. Settling of Activated Sludge. England: Water Research Centre, 1975

[23] Dong Y J, Wang Y L, Feng J. Rheological and fractal characteristics of unconditioned and conditioned water treatment residuals. Water Research, 2011, 45(13): 3871–3882

[24] Chu C P, Lee D J. Multiscale structures of biological flocs. Chemical Engineering Science, 2004, 59(8–9): 1875–1883

[25] Jin P K, Wang X C. Morphological characteristics of Al-humic floc and coagulation chemistry. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 2001, 21: 23–29 (in Chinese) 

[26] Wang Y L, Lu J, Du B Y, Shi B Y, Wang D S. Fractal analysis of polyferric chloride-humic acid (PFC-HA) flocs in different topological spaces. Journal of Environmental Sciences-China, 2009, 21(1): 41–48

[27] Zahid W, Ganczarczyk J. Fractal properties of the RBC biofilm structure. Water Science and Technology, 1994, 29(10–11): 271–279

[28] Wilén B M, Jin B, Lant P. Impacts of structural characteristics on activated sludge floc stability. Water Research, 2003, 37(15): 3632–3645

[29] Smith P G, Coackley P. Diffusivity, tortuosity and pore structure of activated sludge. Water Research, 1984, 18(1): 117–122

[30] Tambo N, Watanabe Y. Physical characteristics of flocs—I. The floc density function and aluminium floc. Water Research, 1979, 13(5): 409–419

[31] Hermanowicz S W, Ganczarczyk J J. Some fluidization characteristics of biological beds. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 1983, 25(5): 1321–1330

[32] Mueller J A, Morand J, Boyle W C. Floc sizing techniques. Applied Microbiology, 1967, 15(1): 125–134

[33] Lagvankar A L, Gemmell R S. A size-density relationship for flocs. Journal - American Water Works Association, 1968, 60(9): 1040–1046

[34] Jin B, Wilén B M, Lant P. A comprehensive insight into floc characteristics and their impact on compressibility and settleability of activated sludge. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2003, 95(1–3): 221–234

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Special Project for Science and Technology on Water Pollution Control and Management(2013ZX07314-001).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg