Microbial communities biostimulated by ethanol during uranium (VI) bioremediation in contaminated sediment as shown by stable isotope probing

Abstract

Stable isotope probing (SIP) was used to identify microbes stimulated by ethanol addition in microcosms containing two sediments collected from the bioremediation test zone at the US Department of Energy Oak Ridge site, TN, USA. One sample was highly bioreduced with ethanol while another was less reduced. Microcosms with the respective sediments were amended with ¹³C labeled ethanol and incubated for 7 days for SIP. Ethanol was rapidly converted to acetate within 24 h accompanied with the reduction of nitrate and sulfate. The accumulation of acetate persisted beyond the 7 d period. Aqueous U did not decline in the microcosm with the reduced sediment due to desorption of U but continuously declined in the less reduced sample. Microbial growth and concomitant ¹³C-DNA production was detected when ethanol was exhausted and abundant acetate had accumulated in both microcosms. This coincided with U(VI) reduction in the less reduced sample. ¹³C originating from ethanol was ultimately utilized for growth, either directly or indirectly, by the dominant microbial community members within 7 days of incubation. The microbial community was comprised predominantly of known denitrifiers, sulfate-reducing bacteria and iron (III) reducing bacteria including Desulfovibrio, Sphingomonas, Ferribacterium, Rhodanobacter, Geothrix, Thiobacillus and others, including the known U(VI)-reducing bacteria Acidovorax, Anaeromyxobacter, Desulfovibrio, Geobacter and Desulfosporosinus. The findings suggest that ethanol biostimulates the U(VI)-reducing microbial community by first serving as an electron donor for nitrate, sulfate, iron (III) and U(VI) reduction, and acetate which then functions as electron donor for U(VI) reduction and carbon source for microbial growth.

Keywords

Stable isotope probing (SIP) / ethanol / acetate / uranium reduction / sediment / bioremediation

References

[1] Lovley D R, Phillips E J. Reduction of uranium by Desulfovibrio desulfuricans. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1992, 58(3): 850–856

[2] Anderson R T, Vrionis H A, Ortiz-Bernad I, Resch C T, Long P E, Dayvault R, Karp K, Marutzky S, Metzler D R, Peacock A, White D C, Lowe M, Lovley D R. Stimulating the in situ activity of Geobacter species to remove uranium from the groundwater of a uranium-contaminated aquifer. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2003, 69(10): 5884–5891

[3] Istok J D, Senko J M, Krumholz L R, Watson D, Bogle M A, Peacock A, Chang Y J, White D C. In situ bioreduction of technetium and uranium in a nitrate-contaminated aquifer. Environmental Science & Technology, 2004, 38(2): 468–475

[4] Coates J D, Ellis D J, Gaw C V, Lovley D R. Geothrix fermentans gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel Fe(III)-reducing bacterium from a hydrocarbon-contaminated aquifer. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, 1999, 49(Pt 4): 1615–1622

[5] Wu W M, Carley J, Gentry T, Ginder-Vogel M A, Fienen M, Mehlhorn T, Yan H, Caroll S, Pace M N, Nyman J, Luo J, Gentile M E, Fields M W, Hickey R F, Gu B, Watson D, Cirpka O A, Zhou J, Fendorf S, Kitanidis P K, Jardine P M, Criddle C S. Pilot-scale in situ bioremedation of uranium in a highly contaminated aquifer. 2. Reduction of u(VI) and geochemical control of u(VI) bioavailability. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(12): 3986–3995

[6] Wu W M, Carley J, Fienen M, Mehlhorn T, Lowe K, Nyman J, Luo J, Gentile M E, Rajan R, Wagner D, Hickey R F, Gu B, Watson D, Cirpka O A, Kitanidis P K, Jardine P M, Criddle C S. Pilot-scale in situ bioremediation of uranium in a highly contaminated aquifer. 1. Conditioning of a treatment zone. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(12): 3978–3985

[7] Wu W M, Carley J, Luo J, Ginder-Vogel M A, Cardenas E, Leigh M B, Hwang C, Kelly S D, Ruan C, Wu L, Van Nostrand J, Gentry T, Lowe K, Mehlhorn T, Carroll S, Luo W, Fields M W, Gu B, Watson D, Kemner K M, Marsh T, Tiedje J, Zhou J, Fendorf S, Kitanidis P K, Jardine P M, Criddle C S. In situ bioreduction of uranium (VI) to submicromolar levels and reoxidation by dissolved oxygen. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(16): 5716–5723

[8] Wu W M, Carley J, Green S J, Luo J, Kelly S D, Van Nostrand J, Lowe K, Mehlhorn T, Carroll S, Boonchayanant B, Löfller F E, Watson D, Kemner K M, Zhou J, Kitanidis P K, Kostka J E, Jardine P M, Criddle C S. Effects of nitrate on the stability of uranium in a bioreduced region of the subsurface. Environmental Science & Technology, 2010, 44(13): 5104–5111

[9] Cardenas E, Wu WM, Leigh MB, Carley J, Carroll S, Gentry T, Luo J, Watson D, Gu B, Ginder-Vogel M, Kitanidis PK, Jardine PM, Zhou J, Criddle CS, Marsh TL, Tiedje JM. Microbial communities in contaminated sediments associated with bioremediation of uranium to submicromolar levels. Applied Environmental Microbiology, 2008, 74(12): 3718–3729

[10] Hwang C, Wu W, Gentry T J, Carley J, Corbin G A, Carroll S L, Watson D B, Jardine P M, Zhou J, Criddle C S, Fields M W. Bacterial community succession during in situ uranium bioremediation: spatial similarities along controlled flow paths. ISME Journal, 2009, 3(1): 47–64

[11] Friedrich M W. Stable-isotope probing of DNA: insights into the function of uncultivated microorganisms from isotopically labeled metagenomes. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2006, 17(1): 59–66

[12] Whiteley A S, Manefield M, Lueders T. Unlocking the ‘microbial black box’ using RNA-based stable isotope probing technologies. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2006, 17(1): 67–71

[13] Evershed R P, Crossman Z M, Bull I D, Mottram H, Dungait J A, Maxfield P J, Brennand E L. 13C-Labelling of lipids to investigate microbial communities in the environment. Current Opinion in Biotechnology,2006, 17(1):72–82

[14] Uhlik O, Leewis M C, Strejcek M, Musilova L, Mackova M, Leigh M B, Macek T. Stable isotope probing in the metagenomics era: a bridge towards improved bioremediation. Biotechnology Advances, 2013, 31(2): 154–165

[15] Luo J, Wu W, Fienen M N, Jardine P M, Mehlhorn T L, Watson D B, Cirpka O A, Criddle C S, Kitanidis P K. A nested-cell approach for in situ remediation. Ground Water, 2006, 44(2): 266–274

[16] Hwang C, Wu W M, Gentry T J, Carley J, Carroll S L, Schadt C, Watson D, Jardine P M, Zhou J, Hickey R F, Criddle C S, Fields M W. Changes in bacterial community structure correlate with initial operating conditions of a field-scale denitrifying fluidized bed reactor. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2006, 71(5): 748–760

[17] Wu W M, Watson D B, Luo J, Carley J, Mehlhorn T, Kitanidis P K, Jardine P M, Criddle C S. Surge block method for controlling well clogging and sampling sediment during bioremediation. Water Research, 2013, 47(17): 6566–6573

[18] Leigh M B, Pellizari V H, Uhlík O, Sutka R, Rodrigues J, Ostrom N E, Zhou J, Tiedje J M. Biphenyl-utilizing bacteria and their functional genes in a pine root zone contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). ISME Journal, 2007, 1(2): 134–148

[19] Ashelford K E, Chuzhanova N A, Fry J C, Jones A J, Weightman A J. New screening software shows that most recent large 16S rRNA gene clone libraries contain chimeras. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2006, 72(9): 5734–5741

[20] Ashelford K E, Chuzhanova N A, Fry J C, Jones A J, Weightman A J. At least 1 in 20 16S rRNA sequence records currently held in public repositories is estimated to contain substantial anomalies. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2005, 71(12): 7724–7736

[21] Cole J R, Chai B, Farris R J, Wang Q, Kulam S A, McGarrell D M, Garrity G M, Tiedje J M. The Ribosomal Database Project (RDP-II): sequences and tools for high-throughput rRNA analysis. Nucleic Acids Research, 2005, 33(Database issue): D294–D296

[22] Lovley D R, Phillips E J, Gorby Y A, Landa E R. Microbial reduction of uranium. Nature, 1991, 350(6317): 413–416

[23] Wu Q, Sanford R A, Löffler F E. Uranium(VI) reduction by Anaeromyxobacter dehalogenans strain 2CP-C. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2006, 72(5): 3608–3614

[24] Zhou P, Gu B. Extraction of oxidized and reduced forms of uranium from contaminated soils: effects of carbonate concentration and pH. Environmental Science & Technology, 2005, 39(12): 4435–4440

[25] Lovley D R, Phillips E J P, Gorby Y A, Landa E R. Microbial reduction of uranium. Nature, 1991, 350(6317): 413–416

[26] Suzuki Y, Kelly SD, Kemner KM, Banfield JF: Enzymatic U(VI) reduction by Desulfosporosinus species. Radiochimica acta, 2004, 92(1): 11–16

[27] Nyman J L, Marsh T L, Ginder-Vogel M A, Gentile M, Fendorf S, Criddle C. Heterogeneous response to biostimulation for U(VI) reduction in replicated sediment microcosms. Biodegradation, 2006, 17(4): 303–316

[28] Cummings D E, Caccavo F Jr, Spring S, Rosenzweig R F. Ferribacterium limneticum, gen. nov., sp. nov., an Fe(III)-reducing microorganism isolated from mining-impacted freshwater lake sediments. Archives of Microbiology, 1999, 171(3): 183–188

[29] Beller H R, Chain P S G, Letain T E, Chakicherla A, Larimer F W, Richardson P M, Coleman M A, Wood A P, Kelly D P. The genome sequence of the obligately chemolithoautotrophic, facultatively anaerobic bacterium Thiobacillus denitrificans. Journal of Bacteriology, 2006, 188(4): 1473–1488

[30] Wolfe A J. The acetate switch. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 2005, 69(1): 12–50

[31] Senko J M, Istok J D, Suflita J M, Krumholz L R. In-situ evidence for uranium immobilization and remobilization. Environmental Science & Technology, 2002, 36(7): 1491–1496

[32] Wu W M, Gu B, Fields M W, Gentile M, Ku Y K, Tiquias S, Nyman J, Zhou J, Jardine P M, Criddle C S. Reduction uranium (VI) by denitrifying biomass. Bioremediation Journal, 2005, 9(1): 49–61

[33] Wu W M, Hickey R F, Zeikus J G. Characterization of metabolic performance of methanogenic granules treating brewery wastewater: role of sulfate-reducing bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1991, 57(12): 3438–3449

[34] Mohanty S R, Kollah B, Hedrick D B, Peacock A D, Kukkadapu R K, Roden E E. Biogeochemical processes in ethanol stimulated uranium-contaminated subsurface sediments. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(12): 4384–4390

[35] Drake H L, Küsel K, Matthies C. Ecological consequences of the phylogenetic and physiological diversities of acetogens. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, 2002, 81(1-4): 203–213

[36] Heo J, Wolfe M T, Staples C R, Ludden P W. Converting the NiFeS carbon monoxide dehydrogenase to a hydrogenase and a hydroxylamine reductase. Journal of Bacteriology, 2002, 184(21): 5894–5897

[37] Magli A, Rainey F A, Leisinger T. Acetogenesis from dichloromethane by a two-component mixed culture comprising a novel bacterium. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1995, 61(8): 2943–2949

[38] O’Loughlin E J, Kelly S D, Cook R E, Csencsits R, Kemner K M. Reduction of uranium(VI) by mixed iron(II)/iron(III) hydroxide (green rust): formation of UO₂ nanoparticles. Environmental Science & Technology, 2003, 37(4): 721–727

[39] Lovley D R, Coates J D, Blunt-Harris E L, Phillips E J P, Woodward J C. Humic substances as electron acceptors for microbial respiration. Nature, 1996, 382(6590): 445–448

[40] Finneran K T, Johnsen C V, Lovley D R. Rhodoferax ferrireducens sp. nov., a psychrotolerant, facultatively anaerobic bacterium that oxidizes acetate with the reduction of Fe(III). International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2003, 53(Pt 3): 669–673

[41] Lovley D R, Roden E E, Phillips E J P, Woodward J C. Enzymatic iron and uranium reduction by sulfate-reducing bacteria. Marine Geology, 1993, 113(1–2): 41–53

[42] Lovley D R, Phillips E J P, Gorby Y A, Landa E R. Microbial reduction of uranium. Nature, 1991, 350(6317): 413–416

[43] Basso O, Caumette P, Magot M. Desulfovibrio putealis sp. nov., a novel sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from a deep subsurface aquifer. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2005, 55(Pt 1): 101–104

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg