Fouling mechanisms in the early stage of an enhanced coagulation-ultrafiltration process

Abstract

We investigated the fouling performances of ultrafiltration (UF) membrane for treating in-line coagulated water in an enhanced coagulation-UF hybrid process. Then we analyzed the fouling mechanisms in the early stage of UF using mathematical models and microscopy observation methods. Finally, we discussed the impact of aeration on membrane fouling in this paper. The results showed that a two-stage of trans-membrane pressure (TMP) profile during the operation of enhanced coagulation-UF membrane was observed, and the relationship between permeability and operation time fitted well with a logarithmic curve. Membrane pores blocking and cake filtration were confirmed as main membrane fouling mechanisms using the mathematical models. The two stages of membrane fouling mechanisms were further deduced, namely, the membrane pore narrowing followed by the formation of cake layer. Membrane autopsy analysis using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the membrane surface sampled from different filtration cycles also confirmed the mechanisms of pores blocking and cake filtration. Moreover, according to the variations of the permeability and membrane fouling resistance, aeration was able to mitigate and control the membrane fouling to a certain extent, but the optimization of aeration conditions still needs to be studied.

Keywords

coagulation-UF / trans-membrane pressure (TMP) / permeability / membrane fouling resistance / scanning electron microscopy (SEM)

References

[1] Shannon M A, Bohn P W, Elimelech M, Georgiadis J G, Mariñas B J, Mayes A M. Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature, 2008, 452(7185): 301–310

[2] Hoek E M V, Bhattacharjee S, Elimelech M. Effect of membrane surface roughness on colloid-membrane DLVO interactions. Langmuir, 2003, 19(11): 4836–4847

[3] Costa A R, de Pinho M N, Elimelech M. Mechanisms of colloidal natural organic matter fouling in ultrafiltration. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 281(1–2): 716–725

[4] Lawrence N D, Perera J M, Iyer M, Hickey M W, Stevens G W. The use of streaming potential measurements to study the fouling and cleaning of ultrafiltration membranes. Separation and Purification Technology, 2006, 48(2): 106–112

[5] Yamamura H, Kimura K, Okajima T, Tokumoto H, Watanabe Y. Affinity of functional groups for membrane surfaces: implications for physically irreversible fouling. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(14): 5310–5315

[6] Lee E K, Chen V, Fane A G. Natural organic matter (NOM) fouling in low pressure membrane filtration - effect of membranes and operation modes. Desalination, 2008, 218(1–3): 257–270

[7] Howe K J, Clark M M. Fouling of microfiltration and ultrafiltration membranes by natural waters. Environmental Science & Technology, 2002, 36(16): 3571–3576

[8] Lee N H, Amy G, Croué J P, Buisson H. Identification and understanding of fouling in low-pressure membrane (MF/UF) filtration by natural organic matter (NOM). Water Research, 2004, 38(20): 4511–4523

[9] Brinck J, Jonsson A S, Jonsson B, Lindau J. Influence of pH on the adsorptive fouling of ultrafiltration membranes by fatty acid. Journal of Membrane Science, 2000, 164(1–2): 187–194

[10] Lee S, Cho J W, Elimelech M. Combined influence of natural organic matter (NOM) and colloidal particles on nanofiltration membrane fouling. Journal of Membrane Science, 2005, 262(1–2): 27–41

[11] Hong S K, Elimelech M. Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 1997, 132(2): 159–181

[12] Lee J D, Lee S H, Jo M H, Park P K, Lee C H, Kwak J W. Effect of coagulation conditions on membrane filtration characteristics in coagulation-microfiltration process for water treatment. Environmental Science & Technology, 2000, 34(17): 3780–3788

[13] Fan L H, Harris J L, Roddick F A, Booker N A. Influence of the characteristics of natural organic matter on the fouling of microfiltration membranes. Water Research, 2001, 35(18): 4455–4463

[14] Kang S K, Choo K H. Why does a mineral oxide adsorbent control fouling better than powdered activated carbon in hybrid ultrafiltration water treatment? Journal of Membrane Science, 2010, 355(1–2): 69–77

[15] Crozes G, Jacangelo J, Anselme C, Laine J. Impact of ultrafiltration operating conditions on membrane irreversible fouling. Journal of Membrane Science, 1997, 124(1): 63–76

[16] Zsirai T, Buzatu P, Aerts P, Judd S. Efficacy of relaxation, backflushing, chemical cleaning and clogging removal for an immersed hollow fibre membrane bioreactor. Water Research, 2012, 46(14): 4499–4507

[17] Yamamura H, Chae S, Kimura K, Watanabe Y. Transition in fouling mechanism in microfiltration of a surface water. Water Research, 2007, 41(17): 3812–3822

[18] Lee N, Amy G, Croue J P, Buisson H. Morphological analyses of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of low-pressure membranes (MF/UF). Journal of Membrane Science, 2005, 261(1–2): 7–16

[19] Wang J, Wang X C. Ultrafiltration with in-line coagulation for the removal of natural humic acid and membrane fouling mechanism. Journal of Environmental Sciences-China, 2006, 18(5): 880–884

[20] Grenier A, Meireles M, Aimar P, Carvin P. Analysing flux decline in dead-end filtration. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2008, 86(11 11A): 1281–1293

[21] Wang F L, Tarabara V V. Pore blocking mechanisms during early stages of membrane fouling by colloids. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2008, 328(2): 464–469

[22] Chu H, Dong B, Zhang Y, Zhou X, Yu Z. Pollutant removal mechanisms in a bio-diatomite dynamic membrane reactor for micro-polluted surface water purification. Desalination, 2012, 293: 38–45

[23] Huang H, Schwab K, Jacangelo J G. Pretreatment for low pressure membranes in water treatment: a review. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(9): 3011–3019

[24] Barbot E, Moustier S, Bottero J Y, Moulin P. Coagulation and ultrafiltration: understanding of the key parameters of the hybrid process. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 325(2): 520–527

[25] Howe K J, Marwah A, Chiu K P, Adham S S. Effect of coagulation on the size of MF and UF membrane foulants. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(24): 7908–7913

[26] Park P K, Lee C H, Choi S J, Choo K H, Kim S H, Yoon C H. Effect of the removal of DOMs on the performance of a coagulation-UF membrane system for drinking water production. Desalination, 2002, 145(1–3): 237–245

[27] Pikkarainen A T, Judd S J, Jokela J, Gillberg L. Pre-coagulation for microfiltration of an upland surface water. Water Research, 2004, 38(2): 455–465

[28] Best G, Singh M, Mourato D, Chang Y J. Application of immersed ultrafiltration membranes for organic removal and disinfection by-product reduction. Water Supply, 2001, 1(5–6): 221–231

[29] Sun L H, Li X, Xia S J, Lü M, Li G B. Pilot study of potassium permanganate enhancing Songhua River water treatment by coagulation/sand filtration /ultrafiltration process. Membrane Science and Technology, 2008, 28(01): 77–80

[30] Liang H, Yang Y L, Gong W J, Li X, Li G B. Effect of pretreatment by permanganate/chlorine on algae fouling control for ultrafiltration (UF) membrane system. Desalination, 2008, 222(1–3): 74–80

[31] Zheng X, Ernst M, Jekel M. Identification and quantification of major organic foulants in treated domestic wastewater affecting filterability in dead-end ultrafiltration. Water Research, 2009, 43(1): 238–244

[32] USEPA. Membrane Filtration Guidance Manual. Ohio: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, 2005

[33] Lin C F, Lin Y C, Chandana P S, Tsai C Y. Effects of mass retention of dissolved organic matter and membrane pore size on membrane fouling and flux decline. Water Research, 2009, 43(2): 389–394

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg