Ecological compensation based on willingness to accept for conservation of drinking water sources

Abstract

Ecological compensation is a powerful environmental economic tool for environmental protection in areas where drinking water sources are located. We established an ecological compensation accounting system based on respondents’ willingness to accept (WTA). In this system, stakeholder preferences and the factors that influence them can be gauged effectively using logit and tobit models. We applied this accounting system to ecological compensation for the Miyun Reservoir, Beijing, China. The average WTA value for Miyun Reservoir residents was approximately 1186 CNY per family in 2012, which could be set as a suitable compensation standard, since it is slightly higher than the local protection cost. Thus, the annual total ecological compensation could be 58.73 million CNY. Distance from the reservoir, job types, and attitude to environmental protection were variables with significant effects on WTA. In addition, trends for individual preferences were identified via an analysis of key influential factors. The results suggest some useful information for establishing ecological compensation mechanisms for conservation of drinking water sources. Suggestions include popularizing the concept and meaning of ecological compensation among residents, setting different compensation levels based on distance from the reservoir, considering the requirements of farmers, and taking various in-kind and out-of-kind compensation approaches.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

contingent valuation method / questionnaire survey / Miyun Reservoir

References

[1] Engel S, Pagiola S, Wunder S. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(4): 663–674

[2] Xu L Y, Li Z X, Li Y. Research on water ecological services value and eco-compensation. In: the 3rd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, iCBBE, Beijing. Lancaster: DES tech Publications, 2009, 1–4

[3] Yang Z F, Han X, Xu L Y, Yu B. An accounting model for watershed ecological compensation to address water management conflicts. Journal of Environmental Accounting and Management, 2013, 1(3): 229–247

[4] Pereira L S, Cordery I, Iacovides I. Improved indicators of water use performance and productivity for sustainable water conservation and saving. Agricultural Water Management, 2012, 108(6): 39–51

[5] Thieme M L, Rudulph J, Higgins J, Takats J A. Protected areas and freshwater conservation: a survey of protected area managers in the Tennessee and Cumberland River Basins, USA. Journal of Environmental Management, 2012, 109(17): 189–199

[6] Pagiola S, Platais G. Payments for Environmental Services: From Theory to Practice. Washington, D C: World Bank, 2007

[7] Asquith N M, Vargas M T, Wunder S. Selling two environmental services: in-kind payments for bird habitat and watershed protection in Los Negros, Bolivia. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(4): 675–684

[8] Yu B, Xu L Y. Study of eco-compensation in hydropower development in China. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2012, 13(3): 891–898

[9] Scherr S, White A, Khare A. Current Status and Future Potential of Markets for Ecosystem Services of Tropical Forests: An Overview. Oaxaca: Mexico, International Tropical Timber Organization, ITTC Paper ITTC (XXXV)/6/Rev, 2003, 1

[10] Wünscher T, Engel S, Wunder S. Spatial targeting of payments for environmental services: a tool for boosting conservation benefits. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(4): 822–833

[11] Pagiola S. Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica. Ecological Economics, 2008, 65(4): 712–724

[12] Chunxia L, Gaodi X, Yu X. Ecological compensation and the cost of wildlife conservation: Chang Tang Grasslands, Tibet. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2012, 3(1): 20–25

[13] Broch S W, Strange N, Jacobsen J B, Wilson K A. Farmers’ willingness to provide ecosystem services and effects of their spatial distribution. Ecological Economics, 2013, 92(8): 78–86

[14] Lindhjem H, Mitani Y. Forest owners’ willingness to accept compensation for voluntary conservation: a contingent valuation approach. Journal of Forest Economics, 2012, 18(4): 290–302

[15] Awad I M. Using econometric analysis of willingness-to-pay to investigate economic efficiency and equity of domestic water services in the West Bank. Journal of Socio-Economics, 2012, 41(5): 485–494

[16] Carson R T. Contingent valuation: a user’s guide. Environmental Science & Technology, 2000, 34(8): 1413–1418

[17] Wang P W, Jia J B. Tourists’ willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation and environment protection, Dalai Lake protected area: Implications for entrance fee and sustainable management. Ocean and Coastal Management, 2012, 62(8): 24–33

[18] Beijing Municipal Commission of Urban Planning. New town planning in Miyun county (2005–2020), 2007.

[19] Fischhoff B. Cognitive processes in stated preference methods. Handbook of Environmental Economics, 2005, 2(1): 937–968

[20] Hanley N, Wright R E, Alvarez-Farizo B. Estimating the economic value of improvements in river ecology using choice experiments: an application to the water framework directive. Journal of Environmental Management, 2006, 78(2): 183–193

[21] Casey J F, Kahn J R, Rivas A A F. Willingness to accept compensation for the environmental risks of oil transport on the Amazon: a choice modeling experiment. Ecological Economics, 2008, 67(4): 552–559

[22] Christensen T, Pedersen A B, Nielsen H O, Morkbak M R, Hasler B, Denver S. Determinations of farmers’ willingness to participate in subsidy schemes for pesticide-free buffer zones- A choice experiment study. Ecological Economics, 2011, 70(8): 1558–1564

[23] Awad I, Hollander R. Toward efficient, equitable and sustainable municipal water supplies for domestic purposes in the west bank: a contingent valuation analysis. European Water, 2010

[24] Buckley C, Hynes S, Mechan S. Supply of an ecosystem service-Farmers’ willingness to adopt riparian buffer zones in agricultural catchments. Environmental Science and Policy, 2012, 24(12): 101–109

[25] Hynes S, Garvey E. Modelling farmers’ participation in an agri-environmental scheme using panel data: an application to the rural environmental protection scheme in Ireland. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2009, 60(3): 546–562

[26] Mary S, John R. Tradeoffs in the choice between logit and OLS for accounting choice studies. Accounting Review, 1991, 66(1): 170–187

[27] Yu X H, Abler D. Incorporating zero and missing responses into CVM with open-ended biding: willingness to pay for blue skies in Beijing. Environment and Development Economics, 2010, 15(05): 535–556

[28] Wossink G A A. Biodiversity conservation by farmers: Analysis of actual and contingent participation. European Review of Agriculture Economics, 2003, 30(4): 461–485

[29] MacDonald D H, Morrison M D, Barnes M B. Willingness to pay and willingness to accept compensation for changes in urban water customer service standards. Water Resources Management, 2010, 24(12): 3145–3158

[30] Statistics M C. Yearbook of Miyun County Statistics. Beijing: China’s Statistics Press, 2013

[31] Wang P, Lassoie J P, Dong S K, Morreale S J. A framework for social impact analysis of large dams: a case study of cascading dams on the Upper-Mekong River, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 2013, 117(3): 131–140

[32] Yu B, Xu L Y. The individual WTA changing analysis for eco-compensation construction in water source conservation area. Advanced Materials Research, 2013, 779–780(3): 1437–1440

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Science and Technology Pillar Program, China (No. 2012BAC05B02) and the State Environment Protection Commonweal Special Program, China (No. 201209032).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg