The calculation of equivalence factor for ecological footprints in China: a methodological note

Abstract

The Ecological Footprint (EF), a physical indicator to measure the extent of humanity’s use of natural resources, has gained much attention since it was first used by Wackernagel and Rees in 1996. In order to appraise land area types with different levels of productivity, they introduced the concept of an equivalence factor. This relates to the average primary biomass productivities of different types of land (i.e. arable land, pasture, forest, water/fishery, built-up land and fossil energy land) to the regional average primary biomass productivity of all land types in a given year. Hence, the equivalence factor is an important parameter in the EF model and it directly affects the reliability of all results. Thus, this article calculates equivalence factors on the national and provincial levels in China based on Net Primary Production (NPP) from MODIS 1 km data in 2008. Firstly, based on the Light Utility Efficiency and CASA model, the NPP of different biologically productive lands of China and of different provinces was calculated. Secondly, China’s equivalence factor for 6 land area types was calculated based on NPP: arable land and built-up land has an equivalence factor of 1.71, forest and fossil energy land has a factor of 1.41, pasture has a factor of 0.44 and water/fishery 0.35; Finally, the equivalence factor of 6 land area types in different provinces was also calculated. The NPP of each ecosystem type varies along with the equivalence factor in different provinces. However, the ranking of the equivalence factors in different provinces remain the same, with that of arable land being the largest, and the water/fishery being the smallest.

Graphical abstract

Keywords

ecological footprint / equivalence factor / net primary production / biological capacity / land types

References

[1] Wackernagel M, Monfreda C, Schulz N B, Erb K H, Haberl H, Krausmann F. Calculating national and global ecological footprint time series: resolving conceptual challenges. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21(3): 271–278

[2] Chen C Z, Lin Z S. A nonlinear dynamic analysis of ecological footprint and biocapacity. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2006, 26: 3812–3816

[3] LI W H, LIU M C. A discussion on indicator systems of Eco-province construction in China. Resources Science, 2007, 29(5): 2–8 (in Chinese)

[4] Rees W E. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environment and Urbanization, 1992, 4(2): 121–130

[5] Wackernagel M, Rees W E. Our Ecological Footprint, Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. Philadelphia: New society Publishers, 1996

[6] Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, Callejas Linares A, Susana López Falfánn I, Méndez García J, Isabel Suárez Guerrero A, Guadalupe Suárez Guerrero M. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29(3): 375–390

[7] Jeroen C J M Van den Bergh Harmen Verbruggen. Spatial sustainability, trade and indicators: an evaluation of the ‘ecological footprint’. Ecological Economics, 1999, 29(1): 61–72

[8] Ferng J J. Toward a scenario analysis framework for energy footprints. Ecological Economics, 2002, 40(1): 53–69

[9] Stöglehner G. Ecological footprint—A tool for assessing sustainable energy supplies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2003, 11(3): 267–277

[10] WWF. Zoological Society of London, Global Footprint Network, 2002. Living Planet Report 2002

[11] WWF. Zoological Society of London, Global Footprint Network, 2004. Living Planet Report 2004

[12] WWF. Zoological Society of London, Global Footprint Network, 2006. Living Planet Report 2006

[13] Min Q W, Yu W D, Cheng S K.Time serial analysis of residents’ living consumption with ecological footprint in Shangqiu of Henan province. Resources Science, 2004, 26(5): 125–131 (in Chinese)

[14] Erb K H. Actual land demand of Austria 1926–2000: a variation on ecological footprint assessments. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21(3): 247–259

[15] Cao S Y, Xie G D. Applying input-output analysis for calculation of ecological footprint of China. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2007, 27(4): 1499–1507 (in Chinese)

[16] Liu M C, Li W H, CFu C, Zhang D. Dynamic Prediction of Chinese Development Based on Ecological Footprint Method. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 2010, 17(6): 499–506

[17] Riley N E. China’s population: new trends and challenges. Population Bulletin, 2004, 59(2): 1–36

[18] Zhong Z. Natural resources planning, management, and sustainable use in China. Resources Policy, 1999, 25(4): 211–220

[19] Chambers N, Simmons C, Wackernagel M. Ecological Footprint Analysis: Towards a Sustainability Indicator for Business. London: Earthscan Publications Ltd., 2001

[20] Hanley N, Moffatt I, Faichney R, Wilson M. Measuring sustainability: a time series of alternative indicators for Scotland. Ecological Economics, 1999, (28): 55–73

[21] Liu J X. Time Series and Geographical Distribution of Ecological Footprint for China. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Shenyang: Northeastern University, 2004 (in Chinese)

[22] Haberl H, Wackernagel M, Krausmann F, Erb K H, Monfreda C. Ecological footprints and human appropriation of net primary production: a comparison. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21(3): 279– 288

[23] Running S W, Nemani R, Heinsch F, Zhao M S, Reeves M, Hashimoto H. A continuous satellite-derived measure of global terrestrial primary production. Bioscience, 2004, 54(6): 547–559

[24] Vitousek P M, Ehrlich P R, Ehrlich A H, Matson P A. Human appropriation of the products of photosynthesis. Bioscience, 1986, 36(6): 368–373

[25] United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP). Indicators for assessing progress towards the 2010 target: ecological footprint and related concepts. Published as a note by the Executive Secretary for the meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technology Advice, Montreal, 2005

[26] Wackernagel M, Monfreda C, Moran D, Wermer P, Goldfinger S, Deumling D, Murray M. National footprint and biocapacity accounts 2005: The underlying calculation method. Oakland, California: Global Footprint Network, 2005

[27] Venetoulis J, Talberth J. Refining the ecological footprint. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2008, 10(4): 441–469

[28] Ruimy A, Saugier B, Dedieu G. Methodology for the estimation of terrestrial net primary production from remotely sensed data. Journal of Geophysical Research, 1994, 99(D3): 5263–5283

[29] Potter C S, Randerson J T, Field C B. Terrestrial ecosystem production: a process model based on global satellite and surface data. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 1993, (7):811–841

[30] Kitzes J, Galli A, Rizk S M, Reed A, Wackernagel M. Guidebook to the National Footprint Accounts: 2008 Edition. Oakland: Global Footprint Network, 2008

[31] Xie G D, Lu C X, Cheng S K, Zheng D. Evaluation of natural capital utilization with ecological footprint in China. Resources Science, 2001, 23(6): 20–23 (in Chinese)

[32] Liu Y H. The analysis of China’s human-environment relationship fluctuations between 1961-2001: study based on the EF (Ecological Footprint) model. Economic Geography, 2005, 25(2): 219–222,235 (in Chinese)

[33] Yuan X H, Li H, Chen B. Dynamic analysis of sustainable development in China based on the ecological footprint. The Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, 2005, 15(3): 38–42 (in Chinese)

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Key Project for the Strategic Science Plan in IGSNRR,CAS (2012ZD007) and the National Significant Environment Problem Study Program of Ministry of Environmental Protection of China (2008ZX002).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg