Enhanced adsorption of phosphate by loading nanosized ferric oxyhydroxide on anion resin

Jing REN, Nan LI, Lin ZHAO, Nanqi REN

PDF(501 KB)
PDF(501 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2014, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (4) : 531-538. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-014-0629-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Enhanced adsorption of phosphate by loading nanosized ferric oxyhydroxide on anion resin

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Ferric oxyhydroxide loaded anion exchanger (FOAE) hybrid adsorbent was prepared by loading nanosized ferric oxyhydroxide (FO) on anion exchanger resin for the removal of phosphate from wastewater. TEM and XRD analysis confirmed the existence of FO on FOAE. After FO loading, the adsorption capacity of the hybrid adsorbent increased from 38.70 to 51.52 mg·g-1. Adsorption processes for both FOAE and anion resin were better fit to the pseudo first order model. Batch adsorption experiments revealed that higher temperature (313K), higher initial phosphate concentration (50 mg·L-1) and lower solution pH (pH value of 2) would be more propitious to phosphate adsorption. Competition effect of coexisting anions on phosphate removal can be concluded as sulfate>nitrate>chloride. Freundlich isotherm model can describe the adsorption of phosphate on FOAE more accurately, which indicated the heterogeneous adsorption occurred on the inner-surface of FOAE.

Keywords

phosphate removal / adsorption / nanosized ferric oxyhydroxide / anion exchanger

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Jing REN, Nan LI, Lin ZHAO, Nanqi REN. Enhanced adsorption of phosphate by loading nanosized ferric oxyhydroxide on anion resin. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2014, 8(4): 531‒538 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-014-0629-1

References

[1]
YagiS, FukushiK. Removal of phosphate from solution by adsorption and precipitation of calcium phosphate onto monohydrocalcite. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2012, 384(1): 128–136
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[2]
PastorL, ManginD, BaratR, SecoA. A pilot-scale study of struvite precipitation in a stirred tank reactor: conditions influencing the process. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(14): 6285–6291
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[3]
WuY H, LiT L, YangL Z. Mechanisms of removing pollutants from aqueous solutions by microorganisms and their aggregates: a review. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 107: 10–18
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[4]
OnyangoM S, KucharD, KubotaM, MatsudaH. Adsorptive removal of phosphate ions from aqueous solution using synthetic zeolite. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2007, 46(3): 894–900
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
ZhangT, DingL, RenH. Pretreatment of ammonium removal from landfill leachate by chemical precipitation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 166(2–3): 911–915
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[6]
MaJ, PengY Z, WangS Y, WangL, LiuY, MaN P. Denitrifying phosphorus removal in a step-feed CAST with alternating anoxic-oxic operational strategy. Journal of Environmental Sciences-China, 2009, 21(9): 1169–1174
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[7]
ChenC Y, ZhangP Y, ZengG M, DengJ H, ZhouY, LuH F. Sewage sludge conditioning with coal fly ash modified by sulfuric acid. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2010, 158(3): 616–622
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
LiH J, ChenY G. Research on polyhydroxyalkanoates and glycogen transformations: key aspects to biologic nitrogen and phosphorus removal in low dissolved oxygen systems. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 2011, 5(2): 283–290
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
ChoiJ W, LeeS Y, ChungS G, HongS W, KimD J, LeeS H. Removal of phosphate from aqueous solution by functionalized mesoporous materials. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 2011, 222(1–4): 243–254
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
XuX, GaoB Y, YueQ Y, ZhongQ Q. Preparation of agricultural by-product based anion exchanger and its utilization for nitrate and phosphate removal. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(22): 8558–8564
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[11]
LiY, LiuC, LuanZ, PengX, ZhuC, ChenZ, ZhangZ, FanJ, JiaZ. Phosphate removal from aqueous solutions using raw and activated red mud and fly ash. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2006, 137(1): 374–383
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[12]
SongX Y, PanY Q, WuQ Y, ChengZ H, MaW. Phosphate removal from aqueous solutions by adsorption using ferric sludge. Desalination, 2011, 280(1–3): 384–390
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
NingP, BartH J, LiB, LuX, ZhangY. Phosphate removal from wastewater by model-La(III) zeolite adsorbents. Journal of Environmental Sciences-China, 2008, 20(6): 670–674
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[14]
BorggaardO K, Raben-LangeB, GimsingA L, StrobelB W. Influence of humic substances on phosphate adsorption by aluminium and iron oxides. Geoderma, 2005, 127(3–4): 270–279
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
KöseT E, KivancB. Adsorption of phosphate from aqueous solutions using calcined waste eggshell. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 178(15): 34–39
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
WuR S S, LamK H, LeeJ M N, LauT C. Removal of phosphate from water by a highly selective La(III)-chelex resin. Chemosphere, 2007, 69(2): 289–294
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[17]
DingL, WuC, DengH P, ZhangX X. Adsorptive characteristics of phosphate from aqueous solutions by MIEX resin. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2012, 376(1): 224–232
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[18]
BoyerT H, SingerP C. Bench-scale testing of a magnetic ion exchange resin for removal of disinfection by-product precursors. Water Research, 2005, 39(7): 1265–1276
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[19]
XuC H, ChengD D, GaoB Y, YinZ L, YueQ Y, ZhaoX. Preparation and characterization of β-FeOOH-coated sand and its adsorption of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2012, 6(4): 455–462
[20]
DixitS, HeringJ G. Comparison of arsenic(V) and arsenic(III) sorption onto iron oxide minerals: implications for arsenic mobility. Environmental Science & Technology, 2003, 37(18): 4182–4189
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[21]
ZengL, LiX M, LiuJ D. Adsorptive removal of phosphate from aqueous solutions using iron oxide tailings. Water Research, 2004, 38(5): 1318–1326
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[22]
WarnerC L, ChouyyokW, MackieK E, NeinerD, SarafL V, DroubayT C, WarnerM G, AddlemanR S. Manganese doping of magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles: tailoring surface reactivity for a regenerable heavy metal sorbent. Langmuir, 2012, 28(8): 3931–3937
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[23]
MartinB D, ParsonsS A, JeffersonB. Removal and recovery of phosphate from municipal wastewaters using a polymeric anion exchanger bound with hydrated ferric oxide nanoparticles. Water Science and Technology, 2009, 60(10): 2637–2645
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[24]
CumbalL, SenguptaA K. Arsenic removal using polymer-supported hydrated iron(III) oxide nanoparticles: role of donnan membrane effect. Environmental Science & Technology, 2005, 39(17): 6508–6515
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[25]
GuptaM D, LoganathanP, VigneswaranS. Adsorptive removal of nitrate and phosphate from water by a purolite ion exchange resin and hydrous ferric oxide columns in series. Separation Science and Technology, 2012, 47(12): 1785–1792
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
RenJ, LiN, ZhaoL. Adsorptive removal of Cr(VI) from water by anion exchanger based nanosized ferric oxyhydroxide hybrid adsorbent. Chemical and Biochemical Engineering Quarterly, 2012, 26(2): 111–118
[27]
HoY S, McKayG. A comparison of chemisorption kinetic models applied to pollutant removal on various sorbents. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 1998, 76(4): 332–340
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
LiH W, YeZ P, LinY, WangF Y. Phosphorus recovery as struvite from eutropic waters by XDA-7 resin. Water Science and Technology, 2012, 65(12): 2091–2097
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[29]
AwualM R, JyoA. Assessing of phosphorus removal by polymeric anion exchangers. Desalination, 2011, 281(17): 111–117
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
RengarajS, YeonJ W, KimY, JungY, HaY K, KimW H. Adsorption characteristics of Cu(II) onto ion exchange resins 252H and 1500H: kinetics, isotherms and error analysis. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2007, 143(1–2): 469–477
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[31]
PanB J, WuJ, PanB C, LvL, ZhangW M, XiaoL L, WangX S, TaoX C, ZhengS R. Development of polymer-based nanosized hydrated ferric oxides (HFOs) for enhanced phosphate removal from waste effluents. Water Research, 2009, 43(17): 4421–4429
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[32]
ZengH, FisherB, GiammarD E. Individual and competitive adsorption of arsenate and phosphate to a high-surface-area iron oxide-based sorbent. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(1): 147–152
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[33]
LefèvreG. In situ Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy studies of inorganic ions adsorption on metal oxides and hydroxides. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 2004, 107(2–3): 109–123
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[34]
WijnjaH, SchulthessC P. Vibrational spectroscopy study of selenate and sulfate adsorption mechanisms on Fe and Al (hydr)oxide surfaces. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2000, 229(1): 286–297
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[35]
NgC, LossoJ N, MarshallW E, RaoR M. Freundlich adsorption isotherms of agricultural by-product-based powdered activated carbons in a geosmin-water system. Bioresource Technology, 2002, 85(2): 131–135
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51208352), the Tianjin Research Program of Application Foundation and Advanced Technology (No. 13JCQNJC09100), and Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology (No. QA201209). Supplementary material ƒis available in the online version of this article at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11783-014-0629-1 and is accessible for authorized users.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(501 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/