Optimization of thermophilic anaerobic-aerobic treatment system for Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME)

Abstract

Optimization of an integrated anaerobic-aerobic bioreactor (IAAB) treatment system for the reduction of organic matter (Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD), Biochemical Oxygen Demand (BOD) and Total Suspended Solids (TSS) concentrations) in Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) to legal standards with high methane yield was performed for the first time under thermophilic condition (50°C–55°C) by using response surface methodology (RSM). The experiments were conducted based on a central composite rotatable design (CCRD) with three independent operating variables, organic loading rates in anaerobic compartment (OLR_an) and mixed liquor volatile suspended solids (MLVSS) concentration in anaerobic (MLVSS_an) and aerobic compartments (MLVSS_a). The optimum conditions for the POME treatment were determined as OLR_an of 15.6 g COD·L^-1·d^-1, MLVSS_an of 43100 mg·L^-1, and MLVSS_a of 18600 mg·L^-1, where high aerobic COD, BOD and TSS removal efficiencies of 96.3%, 97.9%, and 98.5% were achieved with treated BOD of 56 mg·L^-1 and TSS of 28 mg·L^-1 meeting the discharge standard. This optimization study successfully achieved a reduction of 42% in the BOD concentrations of the final treated effluent at a 48% higher OLR_an as compared to the previous works. Besides, thermophilic IAAB system scores better feasibility and higher effectiveness as compared to the optimized mesophilic system. This is due to its higher ability to handle high OLR with higher overall treatment efficiencies (more than 99.6%), methane yield (0.31 L CH₄·g^-1 COD_removed) and purity of methane (67.5%). Hence, these advantages ascertain the applicability of thermophilic IAAB in the POME treatment or even in other high-strength wastewaters treatment.

Keywords

palm oil mill effluent (POME) / anaerobic / aerobic / thermophilic / biogas / optimization

References

[1] LaPara T M, Alleman J E. Thermophilic aerobic biological wastewater treatment. Water Research, 1999, 33(4): 895–908

[2] Ahn J H, Forster C F. Kinetic analyses of the operation of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic filters treating a simulated starch wastewater. Process Biochemistry, 2000, 36(1–2): 19–23

[3] Yeoh B G, Roslan M Y, Quah S K. Optimising methane yield in anaerobic POME treatment through temperature and process manipulations. Journal of Information Technology, 1991, 1: 19–31

[4] Kim M, Ahn Y H, Speece R E. Comparative process stability and efficiency of anaerobic digestion; mesophilic vs. thermophilic. Water Research, 2002, 36(17): 4369–4385

[5] Barr T A, Taylor J M, Duff S J B. Effect of HRT, SRT and temperature on the performance of activated sludge reactors treating bleached kraft mill effluent. Water Research, 1996, 30(4): 799–810

[6] van Lier J B, Groeneveld N, Lettinga G. Development of thermophilic methanogenic sludge in compartmentalized upflow reactors. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 1996, 50(2): 115–124

[7] Chan Y J. A complete Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME) treatment system using a novel integrated anaerobic-aerobic bioreactor (IAAB). Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Selangor, Malaysia: University of Nottingham, 2011

[8] Beg Q K, Sahai V, Gupta R. Statistical media optimization and alkaline protease production from Bacillus mojavensis in a bioreactor. Process Biochemistry, 2003, 39(2): 203–209

[9] Zinatizadeh A A L, Mohamed A R, Mashitah M D, Abdullah A Z, Isa M H. Optimization of pre-treated palm oil mill effluent digestion in an up-flow anaerobic sludge fixed film bioreactor: a comparative study. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2007, 35(2): 226–237

[10] Zinatizadeh A A L, Mohamed A R, Abdullah A Z, Mashitah M D, Hasnain Isa M, Najafpour G D. Process modeling and analysis of palm oil mill effluent treatment in an up-flow anaerobic sludge fixed film bioreactor using response surface methodology (RSM). Water Research, 2006, 40(17): 3193–3208

[11] Bhatia S, Othman Z, Ahmad A L. Coagulation–flocculation process for POME treatment using Moringa oleifera seeds extract: optimization studies. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2007, 133(1–3): 205–212

[12] Chan Y J, Chong M F, Law C L. An integrated anaerobic-aerobic bioreactor (IAAB) for the treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME): start-up and steady state performance. Process Biochemistry, 2012, 47(3): 485–495

[13] Chan Y J, Chong M F, Law C L. Effects of temperature on aerobic treatment of anaerobically digested palm oil mill effluent (POME). Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2010, 49(15): 7093–7101

[14] Chan Y J, Chong M F, Law C L. Biological treatment of anaerobically digested palm oil mill effluent (POME) using a Lab-Scale Sequencing Batch Reactor (SBR). Journal of Environmental Management, 2010, 91(8): 1738–1746

[15] Box G E P, Hunter J S. Multi-factor experimental design for exploring response surfaces. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1957, 28(1): 195–241

[16] Jenkins D, Richard M G, Daigger G T. Manual on the Causes and Control of Activated Sludge Bulking, Foaming, and Other Solids Separation Problems. 3rd ed. London, UK: IWA Publishing, 2004

[17] Kumar A, Yadav A K, Sreekrishnan T R, Satya S, Kaushik C P. Treatment of low strength industrial cluster wastewater by anaerobic hybrid reactor. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(8): 3123–3129

[18] Shen C F, Guiot S R. Long-term impact of dissolved O₂ on the activity of anaerobic granules. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 1996, 49(6): 611–620

[19] Bashir M J K, Aziz H A, Yusoff M S, Adlan M N. Application of response surface methodology (RSM) for optimization of ammoniacal nitrogen removal from semi-aerobic landfill leachate using ion exchange resin. Desalination, 2010, 254(1–3): 154–161

[20] Mosey F E, Fernandes X A. Patterns of hydrogen in biogas from the anaerobic-digestion of milk-sugars. Water Science and Technology, 1989, 21: 187–196

[21] Fannin K F. Start-up, operation, stability and control. In: Chynoweth D P, Isaacson R, eds. Anaerobic Digestion of Biomass. London: Elsevier, 1987

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from The University of Nottingham Malaysia and Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI) Fund (SF0030).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg