An enhanced environmental multimedia modeling system based on fuzzy-set approach: I. Theoretical framework and model development
Chesheng ZHAN, Rongrong ZHANG, Xiaomeng SONG, Baolin LIU
An enhanced environmental multimedia modeling system based on fuzzy-set approach: I. Theoretical framework and model development
Multimedia environmental modeling is extremely complex due to the intricacy of the systems with the consideration of many related factors. Traditional environmental multimedia models (EMMs) are usually based on one-dimensional and first-order assumptions, which may cause numerical errors in the simulation results. In this study, a new user-friendly fuzzy-set enhanced environmental multimedia modeling system (FEEMMS) is developed, and includes four key modules: an air dispersion module, a polluting source module, an unsaturated zone module, and a groundwater module. Many improvements over previous EMMs have been achieved through dynamically quantifying the intermedia mass flux; incorporating fuzzy-set approach into environmental multimedia modeling system (EMMS); and designing a user-friendly graphic user interface (GUI). The developed FEEMMS can be a useful tool in estimating the time-varying and spatial-varying chemical concentrations in air, soil, and groundwater; characterizing the potential risk to human health presented by contaminants released from a contaminated site; and quantifying the uncertainties associated with modeling systems and subsequently providing robustness and flexibility for the remediation-related decision making.
environmental multimedia modelling / fuzzy-set approach / theoretical framework / environmental protection
[1] |
Di Sante M, Mazzieri F, Pasqualini E. Assessment of the sanitary and environmental risks posed by a contaminated industrial site. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 171(1–3): 524–534
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[2] |
Hsieh C R, Ouimette J R. Comparative study of multimedia modeling for dynamic partitioning of fossil fuels-related pollutants. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1994, 37(3): 489–505
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[3] |
USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). Three Multimedia Models Used at Hazardous and Radioactive Waste Sites. Washington, DC: US EPA, 1996
|
[4] |
Zhang R R, Zhan C S, He Z P, Song X M. Review of environmental multimedia models. Environmental Forensics, 2012, 13(3): 216–224
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Chen Z, Yuan J. An extended environmental multimedia modeling system (EEMMS) for landfill case studies. Environmental Forensics, 2009, 10(4): 336–346
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Labieniec P A, Dzombak D A, Siegrist R L. Soil Risk: risk assessment model for organic contaminants in soil. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 1996, 122(5): 388–398
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
McKone T E, MacLeod M. Tracking multiple pathways of human exposure to persistent multimedia pollutants: regional, continental, and global-scale models. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2003, 28(1): 463–492
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Eisenbud M, Gesell T. Environmental Radioactivity from Natural, Industrial, and Military Sources. 4th ed. NewYork: Academic Press, 1997
|
[9] |
Yuan J, Elektorowicz M, Chen Z. Improved environmental multimedia modeling and its sensitivity analysis. Water Science & Technology, 2011, 63(10): 2155–2163
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Mackay D, Paterson S. Fugacity revisited. Environmental Science & Technology, 1982, 16(12): 654A–660A
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Mackay D. Multimedia Environmental Models: The Fugacity Approach. 2nd ed. Chelsea: Lewis Publishers, 2001
|
[12] |
Cohen Y, Cooter E J. Multimedia environmental distribution of toxics (Mend-Tox) I: hybrid compartment-spatial modeling framework. Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management, 2002, 6(2): 70–86
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[13] |
Zhang R R. Development of a fuzzy-set enhanced environmental multimedia modelling system. Dissertation for the Master Degree. Qubec: Concordia University, 2006
|
[14] |
Labieniec P A. The risk implications of approaches for setting soil remediation goals at hazardous waste contaminated site. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University, 1994
|
[15] |
Carnahan C L, Remer J S. Nonequilibrium and equilibrium sorption with a linear sorption isotherm during mass transport through an infinite porous medium: some analytical solution. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 1984, 73(3–4): 227–258
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Domenico P A. An analytical model for multidimensional transport of a decaying contaminant species. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 1987, 91(1–2): 49–58
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Turner D B. Workbook of Atmospheric Dispersion Estimates. Research Triangle Park, NC: Office of Air Programs, US Environmental Protection Agency, 1970
|
[18] |
Dubois D, Prade H. Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications. 4th ed. New York: Academic Press, 1980
|
[19] |
Labieniec P, Dzombak D, Siegrist R. Risk variability due to uniform soil remediation goals. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 1996, 122(7): 612–621
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Lin J, Hildemann L. A nonsteady-state analytical model to predict gaseous emissions of volatile organic compounds from landfills. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1995, 40(3): 271–295
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[21] |
RickabaughJ F. Evaluation of trace VOC emissions from sanitary landfills. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree, Cincinnati: University of Cincinnati, 1990
|
/
〈 | 〉 |