Effects of bicarbonate and cathode potential on hydrogen production in a biocathode electrolysis cell

Dawei LIANG, Yanyan LIU, Sikan PENG, Fei LAN, Shanfu LU, Yan XIANG

PDF(570 KB)
PDF(570 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2014, Vol. 8 ›› Issue (4) : 624-630. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-013-0584-2
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effects of bicarbonate and cathode potential on hydrogen production in a biocathode electrolysis cell

Author information +
History +

Abstract

A biocathode with microbial catalyst in place of a noble metal was successfully developed for hydrogen evolution in a microbial electrolysis cell (MEC). The strategy for fast biocathode cultivation was demonstrated. An exoelectrogenic reaction was initially extended with an H2-full atmosphere to enrich H2-utilizing bacteria in a MEC bioanode. This bioanode was then inversely polarized with an applied voltage in a half-cell to enrich the hydrogen-evolving biocathode. The electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) kinetics of the biocathode MEC could be enhanced by increasing the bicarbonate buffer concentration from 0.05 mol·L-1 to 0.5 mol·L-1 and/or by decreasing the cathode potential from -0.9 V to -1.3 V vs. a saturated calomel electrode (SCE). Within the tested potential region in this study, the HER rate of the biocathode MEC was primarily influenced by the microbial catalytic capability. In addition, increasing bicarbonate concentration enhances the electric migration rate of proton carriers. As a consequence, more mass H+ can be released to accelerate the biocathode-catalyzed HER rate. A hydrogen production rate of 8.44 m3·m-3·d-1 with a current density of 951.6 A·m-3 was obtained using the biocathode MEC under a cathode potential of -1.3 V vs. SCE and 0.4 mol·L-1 bicarbonate. This study provided information on the optimization of hydrogen production in biocathode MEC and expanded the practical applications thereof.

Keywords

microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) / biocathode / hydrogen production / bicarbonate / cathode potential

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Dawei LIANG, Yanyan LIU, Sikan PENG, Fei LAN, Shanfu LU, Yan XIANG. Effects of bicarbonate and cathode potential on hydrogen production in a biocathode electrolysis cell. Front.Environ.Sci.Eng., 2014, 8(4): 624‒630 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-013-0584-2

References

[1]
LiuH, GrotS, LoganB E. Electrochemically assisted microbial production of hydrogen from acetate. Environmental Science & Technology, 2005, 39(11): 4317-4320
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[2]
ChengS, LoganB E. Sustainable and efficient biohydrogen production via electrohydrogenesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2007, 104(47): 18871-18873
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[3]
LoganB E, CallD, ChengS, HamelersH V M, SleutelsT H J A, JeremiasseA W, RozendalR A. Microbial electrolysis cells for high yield hydrogen gas production from organic matter. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(23): 8630-8640
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[4]
CallD, LoganB E. Hydrogen production in a single chamber microbial electrolysis cell lacking a membrane. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(9): 3401-3406
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[5]
SleutelsT H J A, HamelersH V M, RozendalR A, BuismanC J N. Ion transport resistance in microbial electrolysis cells with anion and cation exchange membranes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2009, 34(9): 3612-3620
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
CallD F, MerrillM D, LoganB E. High surface area stainless steel brushes as cathodes in microbial electrolysis cells. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(6): 2179-2183
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[7]
SelemboP A, MerrillM D, LoganB E. Hydrogen production with nickel powder cathode catalysts in microbial electrolysis cells. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35(2): 428-437
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
LeeH S, TorresC I, ParameswaranP, RittmannB E. Fate of H2 in an upflow single-chamber microbial electrolysis cell using a metal-catalyst-free cathode. Environmental Science & Technology, 2009, 43(20): 7971-7976
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[9]
RozendalR A, JeremiasseA W, HamelersH V M, BuismanC J N. Hydrogen production with a microbial biocathode. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(2): 629-634
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[10]
JeremiasseA W, HamelersH V M, BuismanC J N. Microbial electrolysis cell with a microbial biocathode. Bioelectrochemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2010, 78(1): 39-43
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[11]
VirdisB, RabaeyK, YuanZ, KellerJ. Microbial fuel cells for simultaneous carbon and nitrogen removal. Water Research, 2008, 42(12): 3013-3024
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[12]
WangA J, ChengH Y, RenN Q, CuiD, LinN, WuW M. Sediment microbial fuel cell with floating biocathode for organic removal and energy recovery. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2012, 6(4): 569-574
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
BondD R, LovleyD R. Electricity production by Geobacter sulfurreducens attached to electrodes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2003, 69(3): 1548-1555
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[14]
CroeseE, PereiraM A, EuverinkG J W, StamsA J M, GeelhoedJ S. Analysis of the microbial community of the biocathode of a hydrogen-producing microbial electrolysis cell. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2011, 92(5): 1083-1093
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[15]
AulentaF, CanosaA, MajoneM, PaneroS, RealeP, RossettiS. Trichloroethene dechlorination and H2 evolution are alternative biological pathways of electric charge utilization by a dechlorinating culture in a bioelectrochemical system. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(16): 6185-6190
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[16]
JeremiasseA W, HamelersH V M, CroeseE, BuismanC J N. Acetate enhances startup of a H₂-producing microbial biocathode. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2012, 109(3): 657-664
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[17]
PisciottaJ M, ZaybakZ, CallD F, NamJ Y, LoganB E. Enrichment of microbial electrolysis cell biocathodes from sediment microbial fuel cell bioanodes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2012, 78(15): 5212-5219
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[18]
MerrillM D, LoganB E. Electrolyte effects on hydrogen evolution and solution resistance in microbial electrolysis cells. Journal of Power Sources, 2009, 191(2): 203-208
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
LiangD W, PengS K, LuS F, LiuY Y, LanF, XiangY. Enhancement of hydrogen production in a single chamber microbial electrolysis cell through anode arrangement optimization. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(23): 10881-10885
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[20]
GeelhoedJ S, StamsA J M. Electricity-assisted biological hydrogen production from acetate by Geobacter sulfurreducens. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(2): 815-820
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[21]
MunozL D, ErableB, EtcheverryL, RiessJ, BasséguyR, BergelA. Combining phosphate species and stainless steel cathode to enhance hydrogen evolution in microbial electrolysis cell (MEC). Electrochemistry Communications, 2010, 12(2): 183-186
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
FanY, HuH, LiuH. Sustainable power generation in microbial fuel cells using bicarbonate buffer and proton transfer mechanisms. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(23): 8154-8158
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar

Acknowledgements

This work was financial supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51108014, 21373022, 21073010, 21003007 and U1137602), National Major Research Program (No.2011CB935700), Beijing Nova Program (Z131109000413008), Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (YWF-10-03-021), Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (20111102120045) and Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(570 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/