Land use/cover change effects on floods with different return periods: a case study of Beijing, China

Yueling WANG, Xiaoliu YANG

PDF(553 KB)
PDF(553 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2013, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (5) : 769-776. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-013-0542-z
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Land use/cover change effects on floods with different return periods: a case study of Beijing, China

Author information +
History +

Abstract

In this study, an approach integrating digital land use/cover change (LUCC) analysis, hydraulic modeling and statistical methods was applied to quantify the effect of LUCC on floods in terms of inundation extent, flood arrival time and maximum water depth. The study took Beijing as an example and analyzed five specific floods with return periods of 20-year, 50-year, 100-year, 1000-year and 10000-year on the basis of LUCC over a nine-year period from 1996 to 2004. The analysis reveals that 1) during the period of analysis Beijing experienced unprecedented LUCC; 2) LUCC can affect inundation extent and flood arrival time, and floods with longer return periods are more influenced; 3) LUCC can affect maximum water depth and floods with shorter return periods are more influenced; and 4) LUCC is a major flood security stressor for Beijing. It warns that those cities having experienced rapid expansion during recent decades in China are in danger of more serious floods and recommends that their actual land use patterns should be carefully assessed considering flood security. This integrated approach is demonstrated to be a useful tool for joint assessment, planning and management of land and water.

Keywords

inundation extent / flood arrival time / maximum water depth / shallow flow model

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yueling WANG, Xiaoliu YANG. Land use/cover change effects on floods with different return periods: a case study of Beijing, China. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2013, 7(5): 769‒776 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-013-0542-z

References

[1]
Priess J A, Schweitzer C, Wimmer F, Batkhishig O, Mimler M. The consequences of land-use change and water demands in Central Mongolia. Land Use Policy, 2011, 28(1): 4–10
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Moss T. The governance of land use in river basins: prospects for overcoming problems of institutional interplay with the EU Water Framework Directive. Land Use Policy, 2004, 21(1): 85–94
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Masek J G, Lindsey F E, Goward S N. Dynamics of urban growth in the Washington DC metropolitan area, 1973-1996, from land sat observations. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 2000, 21(18): 3473–3486
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Nie W, Yuan Y, Kepner W, Nash M S, Jackson M, Erickson C. Assessing impacts of landuse and landcover changes on hydrology for the upper San Pedro watershed. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2001, 407(1-4): 105–114
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Bossio D, Geheb K, Critchley W. Managing water by managing land: addressing land degradation to improve water productivity and rural livelihoods. Agricultural Water Management, 2010, 97(4): 536–542
CrossRef Google scholar
[6]
Thanapakpawin P, Richey J, Thomas D, Rodda S, Campbell B, Logsdon M. Effects of landuse change on the hydrologic regime of the Mae Chaem river basin, NW Thailand. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2006, 334(1-2): 215–230
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Naef F, Scherrer S, Weiler M. A process based assessment of the potential to reduce flood runoff by land use change. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2002, 267(1-2): 74–79
CrossRef Google scholar
[8]
Lambin E F, Turner B L, Geist H J, Agbola S B, Angelsen A, Bruce J W, Coomes O, Dirzo R, Fischer G, Folke C, George P S, Homewood K, Imbernon J, Leemans R, Li X, Moran E F, Mortimore M, Ramakrishnan P S, Richards J F, Skanes H, Steffen W, Stone G, Svedin U, Veldkamp T A, Vogel C, Xu J. The causes of land-use and land cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change, 2001, 11(4): 261–269
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Chase T N, Pielke R A Sr, Kittel T G F, Nemani R R, Running S W. Simulated impacts of historical land cover changes on global climate in northern winter. Climate Dynamics, 1999, 16(2-3): 93–105
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Sivanappan R K. Land and water use in India. Land Use Policy, 1984, 1(1): 34–38
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
Warburton M L, Schulze R E, Jewitt G P W. Hydrological impacts of land use change in three diverse South African catchments. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2012, 414-415: 118–135
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Emelko M B, Silins U, Bladon K D, Stone M. Implications of land disturbance on drinking water treatability in a changing climate: demonstrating the need for “source water supply and protection” strategies. Water Research, 2011, 45(2): 461–472
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[13]
Leitinger G, Tasser E, Newesely C, Obojes N, Tappeiner U. Seasonal dynamics of surface runoff in mountain grassland ecosystems differing in land use. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2010, 385(1-4): 95–104
CrossRef Google scholar
[14]
Mao D, Cherkauer K A. Impacts of land-use change on hydrologic responses in the Great Lakes region. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2009, 374(1-2): 71–82
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
White M D, Greer K A. The effects of watershed urbanization on the stream hydrology and riparian vegetation of Los Peñasquitos Creek, California. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006, 74(2): 125–138
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Tu M, Hall M J, de Laat P J M, de Wit M J M. Extreme floods in the Meuse river over the past century: aggravated by land-use changes? Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2005, 30(4-5): 267–276
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Ferronato M, Gambolati G, Teatini P, Baù D. Land surface uplift above compacting over consolidated reservoirs. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2001, 38(46-47): 8155–8169
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Suriya S, Mudgal B V. Impact of urbanization on flooding: The Thirusoolam sub watershed-A case study. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2012, 412 - 413: 210–219
CrossRef Google scholar
[19]
Eakin H, Lerner A M, Murtinho F. Adaptive capacity in evolving peri-urban spaces: Responses to flood risk in the Upper Lerma River Valley, Mexico. Global Environmental Change, 2010, 20(1): 14–22
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Wheater H, Evans E. Land use, water management and future flood risk. Land Use Policy, 2009, 26(Supplement 1): S251–S264
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Villarini G, Smith J A, Serinaldi F, Bales J, Bates P D, Krajewski W F. Flood frequency analysis for nonstationary annual peak records in an urban drainage basin. Advances in Water Resources, 2009, 32(8): 1255–1266
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Brath A, Montanari A, Moretti G. Assessing the effect on flood frequency of land use change via hydrological simulation (with uncertainty). Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2006, 324(1-4): 141–153
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Pottier N, Penning-Rowsell E, Tunstall S, Hubert G. Land use and flood protection: contrasting approaches and outcomes in France and in England and Wales. Applied Geography (Sevenoaks, England), 2005, 25(1): 1–27
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
de Roo A, Odijk M, Schmuck G, Koster E, Lucieer A. Assessing the effects of land use changes on floods in the meuse and oder catchment. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth. Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere, 2001, 26(7-8): 593–599
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
de Roo A, Schmuck G, Perdigao V, Thielen J. The influence of historic land use changes and future planned land use scenarios on floods in the Oder catchment. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 2003, 28(33-36): 1291–1300
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Alcrudo F, García-Navarro P. A high-resolution Godunov-type scheme in finite volumes for the 2D shallow-water equations. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 1993, 16(6): 489–505
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Horritt M. Development and testing of a simple 2D finite volume model of sub-critical shallow water flow. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2004, 44(11): 1231–1255
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Liang D, Lin B, Falconer R A. A boundary-fitted numerical model for flood routing with shock-capturing capability. Journal of Hydrology (Amsterdam), 2007, 332(3-4): 477–486
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Marche F, Bonneton P, Fabrie P, Seguin N. Evaluation of well-balanced bore-capturing schemes for 2D wetting and drying processes. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 2007, 53(5): 867–894
CrossRef Google scholar
[30]
Wang Y, Liang Q, Kesserwani G, Hall J W. A 2D shallow flow model for practical dam-break simulations. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 2011, 49(3): 307–316
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Liang Q, Wang Y, Archetti R. A well-balanced shallow flow solver for coastal simulations. International Journal of Offshore and Polar Engineering, 2010, 20(1): 41–47
[32]
Liang Q, Marche F. Numerical resolution of well-balanced shallow water equations with complex source terms. Advances in Water Resources, 2009, 32(6): 873–884
CrossRef Google scholar
[33]
Guo H, Han Y, Bai X. Hydrological effects of littet on different forest stands and study about surface roughness coefficient. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2010, 24(2): 179–183 (in Chinese)
[34]
Liu Z, Li Z, Sun Z, Zheng Z. Calculation of field Manning’s roughness coefficient. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage, 1998, 17(3): 5–9 (in Chinese)
[35]
Gao H. Study on design flood reexamination of the Miyun Reservoir. China Water Resources, 2011, 3: 55–57 (in Chinese)

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41171405) and CRSRI Open Research Program (Program CKWV2012317/KY).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(553 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/