Effects of shear force on formation and properties of anoxic granular sludge in SBR
Xinyan ZHANG, Binbin WANG, Qingqing HAN, Hongmei ZHAO, Dangcong PENG
Effects of shear force on formation and properties of anoxic granular sludge in SBR
This paper reports the effects of shear force on anoxic granular sludge in sequencing batch reactors (SBR). The study was carried out in two SBRs (SBR1 and SBR2) in which sodium acetate (200 mg COD·L-1) was used as the sole substrate and sodium nitrate (40 mgNO3-N·L-1) was employed as the electron acceptor. The preliminary objective of this study was to cultivate anoxic granules in the SBR in order to investigate the effects of shear force on the formation of anoxic granular sludge and to compare the properties of anoxic sludge in the SBR. This study reports new results for the values of average velocity gradient, a measure of the applied shear force, which was varied in the two SBRs (3.79 s-1 and 9.76 s-1 for SBR1 and SBR2 respectively). The important findings of this research highlight the dual effects of shear force on anoxic granules. A low shear force can produce large anoxic granules with high activity and poor settling ability, whereas higher shear forces produce smaller granules with better settling ability and lower activity. The results of this study show that the anoxic granulation is closely related to the strength of the shear force. For high shear force, this research demonstrated that: 1) granules with smaller diameters, high density and good settling ability were formed in the reactor, and 2) granular sludge formed faster than it did in the low shear force reactor (41days versus 76 days). Once a steady-state has been achieved, the nitrate and COD removal rates were found to be 98% and 80%, respectively. For low shear force, such as was applied in SBR1, this research demonstrated that: 1) the activity of anoxic granular sludge in low shear force was higher than that in high shear force, 2) higher amount of soluble microbial products (SMPs) were produced, and 3) large pores were observed inside the larger granules, which are beneficial for nitrogen gas diffusion. Electron microscopic examination of the anoxic granules in both reactors showed that the morphology of the granules was ellipsoidal with a clear outline. Coccus and rod-shaped bacteria were wrapped by filamentous bacteria on the surface of granule.
denitrification / anoxic granular sludge / sequencing batch reactors (SBR) / shear force
[1] |
Chen J, Lun S Y. Study on mechanism of anaerobic sludge granulation in UASB reactors. Water Science & Technology, 1993, 28(7):171-178
|
[2] |
Wiegant W M. The ‘spaghetti theory’ on anaerobic sludge formation, or the inevitability of granulation. In: Lettinga G, Zehnder A J B, Grotenhuis J T C, Hulshoff Pol L W, eds. Granular Anaerobic Sludge: Microbiology and technology. The Netherlands: Pudoc. Wageningen, 1987, 146-152
|
[3] |
Guiot S R, Pauss A, Costerton J W. A structured model of the anaerobic granules consortium. Water science and technology, 1992, 25(7): 1-10
|
[4] |
Hulshoff Pol L W, de Castro Lopes S I, Lettinga G, Lens P N L. Anaerobic sludge granulation. Water Research, 2004, 38(6): 1376-1389
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Shizas I, Bagley D M. Improving anaerobic sequencing batch reactor performance by modifying operational parameters. Water Research, 2002, 36(1): 363-367
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Choi K H, Chisti Y, Moo-Young M M. Comparative evaluation of hydrodynamic and gas-liquid mass transfer characteristics in bubble column and airlift slurry reactors. The Chemical Engineering Journal, 1996, 62(3): 223-229
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Sánchez Pérez J A, Rodríguez Porcel E M, Casas LópezJ L, Fernández Sevilla J M, Chisti Y. Shear rate in stirred tank and bubble column bioreactors. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2006, 124(1-3): 1-5
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Liu Y, Tay J H. State of the art of biogranulation technology for wastewater treatment. Biotechnology Advances, 2004, 22(7): 533-563
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Dangcong P, Bernet N, Delgenes J P, Moletta R. Aerobic granular sludge - a case report. Water Research, 1999, 33(3): 890-893
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Tay J H, Liu Q S, Liu Y. Microscopy observation of aerobic granulation in sequential aerobic sludge blanket reactor. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2001, 91(1): 168-175
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Quevedo M, Guynot E, Muxi E. Denitrifying potential of methanogenic sludge. Biotechnology Letters, 1996, 18(12): 1363-1368
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
Bhatti Z I, Sumida K, Rouse J D, Furukawa K. Characterization of denitrifying granular sludge treating soft groundwater in an upflow sludge-blanket reactor. Journal of bioscience and bioengineering, 2001, 91(4): 373-377
Pubmed
|
[13] |
Wang Q, Du G C, Chen J. Aerobic granular sludge cultivated under the selective pressure as a driving force. Process Biochemistry, 2004, 39(5): 557-563
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Tay J H, Liu Q S, Liu Y. The effects of shear force on the formation, structure and metabolism of aerobic granules. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2001, 57(1-2): 227-233
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Adav S S, Lee D J, Lai J Y. Effects of aeration intensity on formation of phenol-fed aerobic granules and extracellular polymeric substances. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2007, 77(1): 175-182
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Hulshoff Pol L W, de Zeeuw W J, Velzebber C T M, Lettinga G. Granulation in UASB-reactors. Water science and technology, 1983, 8(9): 291-304
|
[17] |
Wu J, Zhou H M, Li H Z, Zhang P C, Jiang J. Impacts of hydrodynamic shear force on nucleation of flocculent sludge in anaerobic reactor. Water Research, 2009, 43(12): 3029-3036
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Di Iaconi C, Ramadori R, Lopez A, Passino R. Influence of hydrodynamic shear force on properties of granular biomass in a sequencing batch biofiler reactor. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2006, 30(2): 152-157
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Liu Y, Tay J H. The essential role of hydrodynamic shear force in the formation of biofilm and granular sludge. Water Research, 2002, 36(7): 1653-1665
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[20] |
Yu H Q, Fang H H P, Tay J H. Enhanced sludge granulation in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors by aluminum chloride. Chemosphere, 2001, 44(1): 31-36
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[21] |
Camp T R. Flocculation and flocculation basins. Transactions, American Society of Civil Eingineer, 1955, 120: 1-16
|
[22] |
Rushton J H, Richards P A. Unit Operations and Processes in Environmental Engineering. 2nd ed. Boston: PWA, 1996
|
[23] |
Rushton J H.Mixing of liquids in chemical process. Industrical and Engineering Chemistry Research, 1952, 44(2): 2931-2936
|
[24] |
Rushton J H,Oldshue J Y. Mixing-pesengt theory and practice. Chemical Engineering Progress 1953, 49(4): 161-168
|
[25] |
McCabe W L, Smith J C. Harriott, Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1993
|
[26] |
Liu Y, Yang S F, Tay J H. Elemental compositions and characteristics of aerobic granules cultivated at different substrate N/C ratios. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2003, 61(5-6): 556-561
Pubmed
|
[27] |
Qin L, Liu Y, Tay J H. Denitrification on poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate in microbial granular sludge sequencing batch reactor. Water Research, 2005, 39(8): 1503-1510
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[28] |
Tay J H, Yan Y G. Influence of substrate concentration on microbial selection and granulation during start-up of upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors. Water Environment Research, 1996, 68(7): 1140-1150
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[29] |
Pereboom J H F, Vereijken T L F M. Methanogenic granule development in full scale internal circulation reactors. Water science and technology, 1994, 30(8): 9-21
|
[30] |
Etterer T, Wilderer P A. Generation and properties of aerobic granular sludge. Water science and technology, 2001, 43(3): 19-26
Pubmed
|
[31] |
Beccari M, Passino R, Ramodori R, Tandoi V. Kinetics of dissimilatory nitrate and nitrite reduction in suspended growth culture. Water Pollution Control Federation, 1983, 55(1): 58-64
|
[32] |
Ni B J, Zeng R J, Fang F, Xie W M, Sheng G P, Yu H Q. Fractionating soluble microbial products in the activated sludge process. Water Research, 2010, 44(7): 2292-2302
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[33] |
Jarusutthirak C, Amy G. Understanding soluble microbial products (SMP) as a component of effluent organic matter (EfOM). Water Research, 2007, 41(12): 2787-2793
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[34] |
Barker D J, Salvi S M L, Langenhoff A A M, Stuckey D C. Soluble microbial products in ABR treating low-strength wastewater. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2000, 126(3): 239-249
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[35] |
Liu R, Huang X, Fan B, Fijimoto M, Qian Y. Progress of studies on soluble microbial products in a membrane bioreactor. Techniques and Equipment for Environmental Pollution Control(in Chinese), 2002, 3(1): 1-7
|
[36] |
Kratochvil K, Wase D A J, Forster C F. The formation and characterization of a granular sludge in an anoxic USB reactor. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 1996, 74(5): 94-98
|
[37] |
Hulshoff Pol L W, Heijnekamp K, Lettinga G. The selection pressure as a driving force behind the granulation of anaerobic sludge. In: Lettinga G, Zehnder A J B, Grotenhuis J T C, Hulshoff Pol L W, eds. Granular Anaerobic Sludge: Microbiology and Technology. The Netherlands: Pudoc.Wageningen, 1987, 153-61
|
[38] |
Pereboom J H F. Size distribution model for methanogenic granules from full scale UASB and IC reactors. Water science and technology, 1994, 30(12): 211-221
|
[39] |
Liu Y, Tay J H. Metabolic response of biofilm to shear stress in fixed-film culture. Journal of Applied Microbiology, 2001, 90(3): 337-342
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[40] |
Yang S F, Tay J H, Liu Y. A novel granular sludge sequencing batch reactor for removal of organic and nitrogen from wastewater. Journal of Biotechnology, 2003, 106(1): 77-86
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[41] |
Fernández-Nava Y, Marañón E, Soons J, Castrillón L. Denitrification of high nitrate concentration wastewater using alternative carbon sources. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 173(1-3): 682-688
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[42] |
de Bok F A M, Plugge C M, Stams A J M. Interspecies electron transfer in methanogenic propionate degrading consortia. Water Research, 2004, 38(6): 1368-1375
CrossRef
Pubmed
Google scholar
|
[43] |
Chisti Y. Mass transfer. In: Flickinger M C, Drew S W, eds. Encyclopedia of BioprocessTechnology: Fermentation, Biocatalysis, and Bioseparation, vol. 3. New York: Wiley, 1999, 1607-1640
|
/
〈 | 〉 |