Performance of an ANAMMOX reactor treating wastewater generated by antibiotic and starch production processes

Abstract

A pilot-scale anaerobic ammonia oxidation (ANAMMOX) reactor was used to treat mixed wastewater resulting from a chlortetracycline and starch production process. The results, collected over the course of 272 days, show that the ratio of influent ammonium to nitrite, pH, and temperature can all affect the efficiency of nitrogen removal. The ratio of influent ammonium to nitrite was maintained at about 1:1 at a concentration below 200 mg·L^-1 for both influent ammonium and nitrite. The total nitrogen (TN) loading rate was 0.15–0.30 kgN·m^-3·d^-1, pH remained at 7.8–8.5, and temperature was recorded at 33±1°C. The rate of removal of ammonia, nitrite, and TN were over 90%, 90%, and 80%, and the effluent ammonium, nitrite and TN concentrations were below 50, 30, and 100 mg·L^-1.

Keywords

anaerobic ammonia oxidation / antibiotic and starch production / ratio of ammonia to nitrite / total nitrogen

References

[1] Joakim LarssonD G, FickJ. Transparency throughout the production chain: a way to reduce pollution from the manufacturing of pharmaceuticals? Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 2009, 53(3): 161–163

[2] ChelliapanS, WilbyT, SallisP J. Performance of an up-flow anaerobic stage reactor (UASR) in the treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater containing macrolide antibiotics. Water Research, 2006, 40(3): 507–516

[3] BarberW P, StuckeyD C. The use of the anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR) for wastewater treatment: a review. Water Research, 1999, 33(7): 1559–1578

[4] TolotiA A, MehrdadiN. Wastewater Treatment from Antibiotics Plant. International Journal of Environmental of Research, 2011, 5(1): 241–246

[5] OktemY A, InceO, SallisP, DonnellyT, InceB K. Anaerobic treatment of a chemical synthesis-based pharmaceutical wastewater in a hybrid upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(5): 1089–1096

[6] SponzaD T, DemirdenP. Treatability of sulfamerazine in sequential upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor (UASB)/completely stirred tank reactor (CSTR) processes. Separation and Purification Technology, 2007, 56(1): 108–117

[7] DegirmentasI, DeveciN. Anaerobic treatment of antibiotic production wastewater and kinetic evaluations. Journal of Biochemistry, 2004, 136(2): 177–182 (for journals papers)

[8] MohanS V, RaoN C, PrasadK K, SarmaP. Bioaugmentation of an anaerobic sequencing batch biofilm reactor (AnSBBR) with immobilized sulphate reducing bacteria (SRB) for the treatment of sulphate bearing chemical wastewater. Process Biochemistry, 2005, 40(8): 2849–2857

[9] NachevaP M, Peña-LoeraB, Moralez-GuzmánF. Treatment of chemical-pharmaceutical wastewater in packed bed anaerobic reactors. Water Science and Technology, 2006, 54(2): 157–163

[10] FernándezI, Mosquera-CorralA, CamposJ, MéndezR. Operation of an Anammox SBR in the presence of two broad-spectrum antibiotics. Process Biochemistry, 2009, 44(4): 494–498

[11] ZhouL L, JiM, ZhangG Z, YinC X. Treatment of Chemical Synthesis-Based Pharmaceutical Wastewater with Combined ABR and MBR System. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering 2009. Beijing: IEEE Publication, 2009, 1–5

[12] MaW L, QiR, ZhangY, WangJ, LiangC Z, YangM. Performance of a successive hydrolysis, denitrification and nitrification system for simultaneous removal of COD and nitrogen from terramycin production wastewater. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2009, 45(1): 30–34

[13] Halling-SørensenB. Inhibition of aerobic growth and nitrification of bacteria in sewage sludge by antibacterial agents. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2001, 40(4): 451–460

[14] CamposJ L, GarridoJ M, MéndezR, LemaJ M. Effect of two broad-spectrum antibiotics on activity and stability of continuous nitrifying system. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2001, 95(1): 1–10

[15] TangC J, ZhengP, ChenT T, ZhangJ Q, MahmoodQ, DingS, ChenX G, ChenJ W, WuD T. Enhanced nitrogen removal from pharmaceutical wastewater using SBA-ANAMMOX process. Water Research, 2011, 45(1): 201–210

[16] FernandezI, Mosquera-CorralA, CamposJ L, MendezR. Operation of an Anammox SBR in the presence of two broad-spectrum antibiotics. Process Biochemistry, 2009, 44(4): 494–498

[17] TangC J, ZhengP, ChenT T, ZhangJ Q, MahmoodQ, DingS A, ChenX G, ChenJ W, WuD T. Enhanced nitrogen removal from pharmaceutical wastewater using SBA-ANAMMOX process. Water Research, 2011, 45(1): 201–210

[18] van der StarW R L, MicleaA I, van DongenU G J M, MuyzerG, PicioreanuC, van LoosdrechtM C. The membrane bioreactor: a novel tool to grow anammox bacteria as free cells. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2008, 101(2): 286–294

[19] ChamchoiN, NitisoravutS. Anammox enrichment from different conventional sludges. Chemosphere, 2007, 66(11): 2225–2232

[20] TangC J,ZhengP, WangC H, MahmoodQ, ZhangJ Q,ChenX G,ZhangL, ChenJ W.Performance of high-loaded ANAMMOX UASB reactors containing granular sludge. Water Research, 2010, 45(1):135–144

[21] JaroszynskiL, CicekN, SparlingR, OleszkiewiczJ. Importance of the operating pH in maintaining the stability of anoxic ammonium oxidation (anammox) activity in moving bed biofilm reactors. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(14): 7051–7056

[22] YangZ Q, ZhouS Q, SunY B. Start-up of simultaneous removal of ammonium and sulfate from an anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) process in an anaerobic up-flow bioreactor. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 169(1–3): 113–118

[23] KimuraY, IsakaK, KazamaF. Effects of inorganic carbon limitation on anaerobic ammonium oxidation (anammox) activity. Bioresource Technology,2011, 102(6): 4390–4394

[24] JettenM S M, NiftrikL, StrousM, KartalB, KeltjensJ T, Op den CampH J M. Biochemistry and molecular biology of anammox bacteria. Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2009, 44(2–3): 65–84

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg