Flow and mass balance analysis of eco-bio infiltration system

Abstract

A structured stormwater infiltration system was developed and constructed at a university campus and monitoring of storm events was performed during a one-year operation period. The flow and pollutant mass balances were analyzed and the overall efficiency of the system was assessed. While significant positive correlations were observed among rainfall, runoff and discharge volume (R²= 0.93-0.99; p<0.05), there was no significant correlations existed between rainfall, runoff, discharge volume and pollutant load. The system was more effective in reducing the runoff volume by more than 50% for small storm events but the difference between the runoff and discharge volume was significant even with rainfall greater than 10 mm. Results showed that the pollutant reduction rates were higher compared to the runoff volume reduction. Average pollutant reduction rates were in the range of 72% to 90% with coefficient of variation between 0.10 and 0.46. Comparable with runoff reduction, the system was more effective in reducing the pollutant load for small storm events, in the range of 80% to 100% for rainfall between 0 and 10 mm; while 65% to 80% for rainfall between 10 and 20 mm. Among the pollutant parameters, particulate matters was highly reduced by the system achieving only a maximum of 25% discharge load even after the entire runoff was completely discharged. The findings have proven the capability of the system as a tool in stormwater management achieving both flow reduction and water quality improvement.

Keywords

best management practice / flow balance / low impact development / mass balance / nonpoint source / stormwater runoff

References

[1] Coffman L. Low-Impact Development Design Strategies, an Integrated Design Approach. Prince George’s County, Maryland: Department of Environmental Resources, Programs and Planning Division, 2000

[2] Ferguson B. Stormwater management and stormwater restoration. In: France R L, ed. Handbook of Water Sensitive Planning and Design. Washington DC: Lewis Publishers, 2002

[3] Lloyd S D, Wong T H F, Chesterfield C. Water Sensitive Urban Design: A Stormwater Management Perspective. Melbourne: CRC for Catchment Hydrology Industry, 2002

[4] U.S. Department of Defense (US DoD). Unified Facilities Criteria- Design: Low Impact Development Manual. Washington, DC, Unified States: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, and Air Force Civil Engineering Support Agency, 2004

[5] Dunnett N, Clayden A. Rain Gardens: Sustainable Rainwater Management for the Garden and Designed Landscape. Portland: Timber Press, 2007

[6] Bettess R. Infiltration Drainage – Manual of Good Practice. London: Construction Industry Research and Information Association, 1996

[7] Strecker E W, Quigley M M, Urbonas B R, Jones E J, Clary J K. Determining urban storm water BMP effectiveness. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 2001, 127(3): 144–149

[8] Weinstein N. Decentralized Stormwater Controls for Urban Retrofit and Combined Sewer Overflow Reduction. Alexandria, VA, United States: Water Environment Research Foundation, 2006

[9] National Research Council (NRC). Urban Stormwater Management in the United States. Washington DC: National Academies Press, 2008

[10] Battiata J, Collins K, Hirschman D, Hoffman G. The runoff reduction method. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 2010, 146: 11–21

[11] Li H, Davis A P. Water quality improvement through reductions of pollutant loads using bioretention. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2009, 135(8): 567–576

[12] Passeport E, Hunt W F, Line D E, Smith R A, Brown R A. Field study of the ability of two grassed bioretention cells to reduce stormwater runoff pollution. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 2009, 135(4): 505–510

[13] Wild T B, Davis A P. Simulation of the performance of a stormwater BMP. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Science, 2009, 135(12): 1257–1267

[14] Davis A P, Traver R G, Hunt W F. Improving urban stormwater quality: applying fundamental principles. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 2010, 146: 3–10

[15] Stenstrom M K, Kayhanian M. First Flush Phenomenon Characterization. Sacramento, CA, United States: Department of California Transportation, 2005

[16] Kim L H, Ko S O, Jeong S M, Yoon J Y. Characteristics of washed-off pollutants and dynamic EMCs in parking lots and bridges during a storm. The Science of the Total Environment, 2007, 376(1-3): 178–184

[17] Maniquiz M C, Choi J Y, Lee S Y, Cho H J, Kim L H. Appropriate methods in determining the event mean concentration and pollutant removal efficiency of a best management practice. Environmental Engineering Research, 2010, 15(4): 215–223

[18] Zhang R, Zhou W, Field R, Tafuri A, Yu S, Jin K. Field test of best management practice pollutant removal efficiencies in Shenzhen, China. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 2009, 3(3): 354–363

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the Eco-STAR Project under the grant of the Ministry of Environment in Korea (07-II-6). The authors are grateful for their support.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg