Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of chromium-contaminated soil using approaching anodes

Abstract

As a new technology used for the cleaning of chromium-contaminated soil, worldwide interest in eletrokinetic (EK) remediation has grown considerably in recent times. However, owing to the fact that chromium exists as both cationic and anionic species in the soil, it is not an efficient method. This paper reports upon a study in which a process using approaching anodes (AAs) was used to enhance the removal efficiency of chromium by eletrokinetics. Two bench-scale experiments to remove chromium from contaminated soil were performed, one using a fixed anode (FA) and the other using AAs. In the AAs experiment, the anode moved toward the cathode by 7 cm every three days. After remediation, soil pH, total chromium, and fractionation of chromium in the soil were determined. The average removal efficiency of total chromium was 11.32% and 18.96% in the FA and AAs experiments, respectively. After remediation, acidic soil conditions throughout the soil were generated through the use of AAs, while 80% of the soil remained neutral or alkalic when using the FA approach. The acidic soil environment and high field intensity in the AAs experiment might have favored chromium desorption, dissolution and dissociation from the soil, plus the mobility of chromium in the soil was also enhanced. The results demonstrate that AAs used in the process of EK remediation can enhance the efficiency of chromium removal from soil.

Keywords

approaching anodes / chromium-contaminated soil / electrokinetics / chromium fractionation

References

[1] Page M M, Page C L. Electroremediation of contaminated soils. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2002, 128(3): 208–219

[2] Acar Y B, Alshawabkeh A N. Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environmental Science & Technology, 1993, 27(13): 2638–2647

[3] Probstein R F, Hicks R E. Removal of contaminants from soils by electric fields. Science, 1993, 260(5107): 498–503

[4] Reddy K R, Parupudi U S. Removal of chromium, nickel and cadmium from clays by in-situ electrokinetic remediation. Journal of Soil Contamination, 1997, 6(4): 391–407

[5] Reddy K R, Chinthamreddy S. Electrokinetic remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils under reducing environments. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 1999, 19(4): 269–282

[6] Kotas J, Stasicka Z. Chromium occurrence in the environment and methods of its speciation. Environmental Pollution, 2000, 107(3): 263–283

[7] Reddy K R, Chinthamreddy S. Effects of initial form of chromium on electrokinetic remediation in clays. Advances in Environmental Research, 2003, 7(2): 353–365

[8] Weng C H, Yuan C. Removal of Cr(III) from clay soils by electrokinetics. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2001, 23(3): 281–285

[9] Gent D B, Bricka R M, Alshawabkeh A N, Larson S L, Fabian G, Granade S. Bench- and field-scale evaluation of chromium and cadmium extraction by electrokinetics. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2004, 110(1-3): 53–62

[10] Reddy K R, Chinthamreddy S. Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of heavy metals in glacial till soils using different electrolyte solutions. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2004, 130(4): 442–455

[11] Zhou D M, Alshawabkeh A N, Deng C F, Cang L, Si Y B. Electrokinetic removal of chromium and copper from contaminated soils by lactic acid enhancement in the catholyte. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 2004, 16(4): 529–532

[12] Hansen H K, Ottosen L M, Kliem B K, Villumsen A. Electrodialytic remediation of soils polluted with Cu, Cr, Hg, Pb and Zn. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 1997, 70(1): 67–73

[13] Reddy K R, Chinthamreddy S. ASCE M, Chinthamreddy S. Sequentially enhanced electrokinetic remediation of heavy metals in low buffering clayey soils. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2003, 129(3): 263–277

[14] Li Z M, Yu J W, Neretnieks I. Removal of Pb(II), Cd(II) and Cr(III) from sand by electromigration. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 1997, 55(1-3): 295–304

[15] USEPA,. SW-846 Method 3060A Alkaline digestion for hexavalent chromium, Revision 1, 1996

[16] Rauret G, López-Sánchez J F, Sahuquillo A, Rubio R, Davidson C, Ure A, Quevauviller P. Improvement of the BCR three step sequential extraction procedure prior to the certification of new sediment and soil reference materials. Journal of Environmental Monitoring, 1999, 1(1): 57–61

[17] Shen Z M, Chen X J, Jia J P, Qu L, Wang W H. Comparison of electrokinetic soil remediation methods using one fixed anode and approaching anodes. Environmental Pollution, 2007, 150(2): 193–199

[18] Kimbrough D E, Cohen Y, Winer A M, Creelman L, Mabuni C. A critical assessment of chromium in the environment. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 1999, 29(1): 1–46

[19] Yang J, Guo R, Chen S, Li L. Interaction between Cr(VI) and a Fe-rich soil in the presence of oxalic and tartaric acids. Environmental Geology, 2008, 53(7): 1529–1533

[20] Reddy K R, Xu C Y, Chinthamreddy S. Assessment of electrokinetic removal of heavy metals from soils by sequential extraction analysis. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2001, 84(2-3): 279–296

[21] Ando Y, Tanaka T. Proposal for a new system for simultaneous production of hydrogen and hydrogen peroxide by water electrolysis. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2004, 29(13): 1349–1354

[22] Choi J H, Maruthamuthu S, Lee H G, Ha T H, Bae J H. Electrochemical studies on the performance of SS316L electrode in electrokinetics. Metals and Materials International, 2009, 15(5): 771–781

[23] Nieto Castillo A, Soriano J, García Delgado R. Changes in chromium distribution during the electrodialytic remediation of a Cr(VI)-contaminated soil. Environmental Geochemistry and Health, 2008, 30(2): 153–157

[24] Yuan C, Weng C H. Electrokinetic enhancement removal of heavy metals from industrial wastewater sludge. Chemosphere, 2006, 65(1): 88–96

[25] Yin J, Ma X, Sun H. Study on electrokinetic remediation of soil contaminated by chromium. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2008, 2(5): 684–689 (in Chinese)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (No. 2009AA063101) and the Knowledge Innovation Project Key-Direction Project Sub-project of Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. 09ZY441YZ).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg