Characterization of humic substances in bio-treated municipal solid waste landfill leachate

Abstract

Considerable organic matter remains in municipal solid waste landfill leachate after biological treatments. Humic substances (HSs) dominate the organic matter in bio-treated landfill leachate. In this study, the HSs from landfill leachate treated by membrane bioreactor (MBR-HSs) were analyzed via elemental analysis, ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and charge polarized magic-angle spinning-¹³C-nuclear magnetic resonance. The characteristic absorption in the UV wavelength range indicated the presence of high C=C and C=O double bonds within the MBR-HSs. Compared with commercial HSs, MBR-HSs had lower carbon content [48.14% for fulvic acids (FA) and 49.52% for humic acids (HA)], higher nitrogen content (4.31% for FA and 6.16% for HA), lower aromatic structure content, and higher carbohydrate and carboxylic atoms of carbon content. FA predominantly had an aliphatic structure, and HA had less condensed or substituted aromatic ring structures than natural HA. The aromatic carbon content of MBR-HSs was lower than that of humus-derived HSs but higher than that of waste-derived HSs, indicating that MBR-HSs appeared to be more similar to humus-derived HSs than waste-derived HA.

Keywords

bio-treated landfill leachate / humic substances / elemental analysis / spectroscopic characteristics

References

[1] Trebouet D, Schlumpf J P, Jaouen P, Quemeneur F. Stabilized landfill leachate treatment by combined physicochemical-nanofiltration processes. Water Research, 2001, 35(12): 2935–2942

[2] Rivas F J, Beltrán F, Carvalho F, Acedo B, Gimeno O. Stabilized leachates: sequential coagulation-flocculation+ chemical oxidation process. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2004, 116(1–2): 95–102

[3] Ntampou X, Zouboulis A I, Samaras P. Appropriate combination of physico-chemical methods (coagulation/flocculation and ozonation) for the efficient treatment of landfill leachates. Chemosphere, 2006, 62(5): 722–730

[4] Satyawali Y, van de Wiele T, Saveyn H, van der Meeren P, Verstraete W. Electrolytic reduction improves treatability of humic acids containing water streams. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 2007, 82(8): 730–737

[5] Liu Y, Li X, Wang B, Liu S. Performance of landfill leachate treatment system with disc-tube reverse osmosis units. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 2008, 2(1): 24–31

[6] Labanowski J, Pallier V, Feuillade-Cathalifaud G. Study of organic matter during coagulation and electrocoagulation processes: application to a stabilized landfill leachate. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2010, 179(1–3): 166–172

[7] Alvarez-Vazquez H, Jefferson B, Judd S J. Membrane bioreactors vs conventional biological treatment of landfill leachate: a brief review. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 2004, 79(10): 1043–1049

[8] Robinson T. Membrane bioreactors: Nanotechnology improves landfill leachate quality. Filtration & separation, 2007, 44(9): 38–39

[9] Zouboulis A I, Chai X L, Katsoyiannis I A. The application of bioflocculant for the removal of humic acids from stabilized landfill leachates. Journal of Environmental Management, 2004, 70(1): 35–41

[10] Xu Y D, Yue D B, Zhu Y, Nie Y F. Fractionation of dissolved organic matter in mature landfill leachate and its recycling by ultrafiltration and evaporation combined processes. Chemosphere, 2006, 64(6): 903–911

[11] Zhang L, Li A, Lu Y, Yan L, Zhong S, Deng C. Characterization and removal of dissolved organic matter (DOM) from landfill leachate rejected by nanofiltration. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 2009, 29(3): 1035–1040

[12] Kang K H, Shin H S, Park H. Characterization of humic substances present in landfill leachates with different landfill ages and its implications. Water Research, 2002, 36(16): 4023–4032

[13] Stevenson F J. Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, Reactions. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1982

[14] Grinhut T, Hertkorn N, Schmitt-Kopplin P, Hadar Y, Chen Y. Mechanisms of humic acids degradation by white rot fungi explored using ¹H NMR spectroscopy and FTICR mass spectrometry. Environmental Science & Technology, 2011, 45(7): 2748–2754

[15] Hubbe M A, Nazhad M, Sánchez C. Composting as a way to convert cellulosic biomass and organic waste into high-value soil amendments: a review. BioResources, 2010, 5(4): 2808–2854

[16] Giannouli A, Kalaitzidis S, Siavalas G, Chatziapostolou A, Christanis K, Papazisimou S, Papanicolaou C, Foscolos A. Evaluation of Greek low-rank coals as potential raw material for the production of soil amendments and organic fertilizers. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2009, 77(3–4): 383–393

[17] Christensen J B, Jensen D L, Grøn C, Filip Z, Christensen T H. Characterization of the dissolved organic carbon in landfill leachate-polluted groundwater. Water Research, 1998, 32(1): 125–135

[18] Nanny M A, Ratasuk N. Characterization and comparison of hydrophobic neutral and hydrophobic acid dissolved organic carbon isolated from three municipal landfill leachates. Water Research, 2002, 36(6): 1572–1584

[19] Han Y S, Lee J Y, Miller C J, Franklin L. Characterization of humic substances in landfill leachate and impact on the hydraulic conductivity of geosynthetic clay liners. Waste management & research, 2009, 27(3): 233–241

[20] Hertkorn N, Claus H, Schmitt-Kopplin Ph, Perdue E M, Filip Z. Utilization and transformation of aquatic humic substances by autochthonous microorganisms. Environmental Science & Technology, 2002, 36(20): 4334–4345

[21] Reemtsma T, These A, Springer A, Linscheid M. Fulvic acids as transition state of organic matter: indications from high resolution mass spectrometry. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(19): 5839–5845

[22] Li R, Yue D, Liu J, Nie Y. Size fractionation of organic matter and heavy metals in raw and treated leachate. Waste Management (New York, N.Y.), 2009, 29(9): 2527–2533

[23] Huffman E W D, Stuber H A. Analytical methodology for elemental analysis of humic substances. In: Aiken G R, McKnight D M, Warshaw R L, eds. Humic Substances in Soil, Sediment, and Water. New York: Wiley, 1985, 433–455

[24] Malcolm R L, Maccarthy P. Limitations in the use of commercial humic acids in water and soil research. Environmental Science & Technology, 1986, 20(9): 904–911

[25] Duarte R M B O, Santos E B H, Pio C A, Duarte A C. Comparison of structural features of water-soluble organic matter from atmospheric aerosols with those of aquatic humic substances. Atmospheric Environment, 2007, 41(37): 8100–8113

[26] Thurman E M, Malcolm R L. Preparative isolation of aquatic humic substances. Environmental Science & Technology, 1981, 15(4): 463–466

[27] Almendros G, Guadalix M E, González-Vila F J, Martin F. Preservation of aliphatic macromolecules in soil humins. Organic Geochemistry, 1996, 24(6–7): 651–659

[28] Abbt-Braun G, Lankes U, Frimmel F H. Structural characterization of aquatic humic substances- the need for a multiple method approach. Aquatic Sciences, 2004, 66(2): 151–170

[29] Langhals H, Abbt-Braun G, Frimmel F H. Association of humic substances: verification of lambert-beer law. Acta Hydrochimica et Hydrobiologica, 2000, 28(6): 329–332

[30] Ayuso M, Moreno J L, Hernández T, García C. Characterisation and evaluation of humic acids extracted from urban waste as liquid fertilisers. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1997, 75(4): 481–488

[31] Carvalho S I M, Otero M, Duarte A C, Santos E B H. Spectroscopic changes on fulvic acids from a kraft pulp mill effluent caused by sun irradiation. Chemosphere, 2008, 73(11): 1845–1852

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key Project of Scientific and Technical Supporting Programs of China (Nos. 2006BAC06B05 and 2006BAC06B01), the Beijing Science and Technology Project (No. D08040600350804) and the Key Laboratory for Solid Waste Management and Environment Safety, Ministry of Education (No. SWMES2010-12).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg