Effects of hydraulic retention time on nitrification activities and population dynamics of a conventional activated sludge system

Hongyan LI, Yu ZHANG, Min YANG, Yoichi KAMAGATA

PDF(168 KB)
PDF(168 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2013, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (1) : 43-48. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-012-0397-8
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effects of hydraulic retention time on nitrification activities and population dynamics of a conventional activated sludge system

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The effects of hydraulic retention time (HRT) on the nitrification activities and population dynamics of a conventional activated sludge system fed with synthetic inorganic wastewater were investigated over a period of 260 days. When the HRT was gradually decreased from 30 to 5 h, the specific ammonium-oxidizing rates (SAOR) varied between 0.32 and 0.45 kg NH4+-N (kg mixed liquor suspended solids (MLSS)·d)-1, and the specific nitrate-forming rates (SNFR) increased from 0.11 to 0.50 kg NO3--N (kg MLSS·d)-1, showing that the decrease in HRT led to a significant increase in the nitrite oxidation activity. According to fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis results, the proportion of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOBs) among the total bacteria decreased from 33% to 15% with the decrease in HRT, whereas the fraction of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria (NOBs), particularly the fast-growing Nitrobacter sp., increased significantly (from 4% to 15% for NOBs and from 1.5% to 10.6% for Nitrobacter sp.) with the decrease in HRT, which was in accordance with the changes in SNFR. A short HRT favored the relative growth of NOBs, particularly the fast-growing Nitrobacter sp., in the conventional activated sludge system.

Keywords

ammonia-oxidizing bacteria / hydraulic retention time / nitrification activity / nitrite-oxidizing bacteria / population dynamics

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Hongyan LI, Yu ZHANG, Min YANG, Yoichi KAMAGATA. Effects of hydraulic retention time on nitrification activities and population dynamics of a conventional activated sludge system. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2013, 7(1): 43‒48 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-012-0397-8

References

[1]
Campos J L, Garrido-Fernandez J M, Mendez R, Lema J M. Nitrification at high ammonia loading rates in an activated sludge unit. Bioresource Technology, 1999, 68(2): 141-148
CrossRef Google scholar
[2]
Carrera J, Baeza J A, Vicent T, Lafuente J. Biological nitrogen removal of high-strength ammonium industrial wastewater with two-sludge system. Water Research, 2003, 37(17): 4211-4221
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[3]
Geets J, de Cooman M, Wittebolle L, Heylen K, Vanparys B, de Vos P, Verstraete W, Boon N. Real-time PCR assay for the simultaneous quantification of nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria in activated sludge. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2007, 75(1): 211-221
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[4]
Okabe S, Satoh H, Watanabe Y. In situ analysis of nitrifying biofilms as determined by in situ hybridization and the use of microelectrodes. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1999, 65(7): 3182-3191
Pubmed
[5]
Satoh H, Yamakawa T, Kindaichi T, Ito T, Okabe S. Community structures and activities of nitrifying and denitrifying bacteria in industrial wastewater-treating biofilms. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2006, 94(4): 762-772
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[6]
Siripong S, Rittmann B E. Diversity study of nitrifying bacteria in full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plants. Water Research, 2007, 41(5): 1110-1120
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[7]
Dionisi H M, Layton A C, Robinson K G, Brown J R, Gregory I R, Parker J J, Sayler G S. Quantification of Nitrosomonas oligotropha and Nitrospira spp. using competitive polymerase chain reaction in bench-scale wastewater treatment reactors operating at different solids retention times. Water Environment Research, 2002, 74(5): 462-469
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[8]
Grady C P, Daigger G T, Lim H C. Biological Wastewater Treatment. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc, 1999
[9]
Qin Y Y, Zhang X W, Ren H Q, Li D T, Yang H. Population dynamics of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in an aerated submerged biofilm reactor for micropolluted raw water pretreatment. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2008, 79(1): 135-145
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[10]
Satoh H, Okabe S, Yamaguchi Y, Watanabe Y. Evaluation of the impact of bioaugmentation and biostimulation by in situ hybridization and microelectrode. Water Research, 2003, 37(9): 2206-2216
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[11]
Park H D, Noguera D R. Evaluating the effect of dissolved oxygen on ammonia-oxidizing bacterial communities in activated sludge. Water Research, 2004, 38(14-15): 3275-3286
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[12]
Horz H P, Rotthauwe J H, Lukow T, Liesack W. Identification of major subgroups of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in environmental samples by T-RFLP analysis of amoA PCR products. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 2000, 39(3): 197-204
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[13]
You S J, Hsu C L, Chuang S H, Ouyang C F. Nitrification efficiency and nitrifying bacteria abundance in combined AS-RBC and A2O systems. Water Research, 2003, 37(10): 2281-2290
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[14]
Mobarry B K, Wagner M, Urbain V, Rittmann B E, Stahl D A. Phylogenetic probes for analyzing abundance and spatial organization of nitrifying bacteria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1996, 62(6): 2156-2162
Pubmed
[15]
Brandt K K, Hesselsøe M, Roslev P, Henriksen K, Sørensen J. Toxic effects of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate on metabolic activity, growth rate, and microcolony formation of Nitrosomonas and Nitrosospira strains. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2001, 67(6): 2489-2498
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[16]
Schramm A. Beer de D, Heuvel van den J C, Ottengraf S, Amann R. Microscal distribution of populations and activities of Nitrosospira and Nitrospira spp. along a macroscale gradient in a nitrifying bioreactor: quantification by in situ hybridization and the use of microsensors. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 1999, 65 (8): 3690-3696
Pubmed
[17]
Rowan A K, Snape J R, Fearnside D, Barer M R, Curtis T P, Head I M. Composition and diversity of ammonia-oxidising bacterial communities in wastewater treatment reactors of different design treating identical wastewater. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2003, 43(2): 195-206
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[18]
Yu T, Qi R, Li D, Zhang Y, Yang M. Nitrifier characteristics in submerged membrane bioreactors under different sludge retention times. Water Research, 2010, 44(9): 2823-2830
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[19]
Nogueira R, Melo L F, Purkhold U, Wuertz S, Wagner M. Nitrifying and heterotrophic population dynamics in biofilm reactors: effects of hydraulic retention time and the presence of organic carbon. Water Research, 2002, 36(2): 469-481
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[20]
Li H Y, Zhang Y, Gao F, Yu T, Yang M. Effects of hydraulic retention time (HRT) on nitrification performance and microbial community of conventional activated sludge (CAS). Environmental Science, 2006, 27(9): 1862-1865 (in Chinese)
Pubmed
[21]
Kurisu F, Satoh H, Mino T, Matsuo T. Microbial community analysis of thermophilic contact oxidation process by using ribosomal RNA approaches and the quinone profile method. Water Research, 2002, 36(2): 429-438
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[22]
Gao M, Yang M, Li H, Yang Q, Zhang Y. Comparison between a submerged membrane bioreactor and a conventional activated sludge system on treating ammonia-bearing inorganic wastewater. Journal of Biotechnology, 2004, 108(3): 265-269
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[23]
Environmental Protection Bureau. The Standard Methods of Water and Wastewater Monitoring and Analysis of China, 4th ed. Beijing: China Environmental Science Press, 2002
[24]
Amann R I, Ludwig W, Schleifer K H. Phylogenetic identification and in situ detection of individual microbial cells without cultivation. Microbiological Reviews, 1995, 59(1): 143-169
Pubmed
[25]
Li H Y, Yang M, Zhang Y, Yu T, Kamagata Y. Nitrification performance and microbial community dynamics in a submerged membrane bioreactor with complete sludge retention. Journal of Biotechnology, 2006, 123(1): 60-70
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[26]
Hesselose M, Brandt K K, Sorensen J. Quantification of ammonia oxidizing bacteria in soil using microcolony technique combined with fluorescence in situ hybridization (MCFU-FISH). FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2001, 38 (2 - 3): 87-95
[27]
Persson F, Wik T, Sörensson F, Hermansso M. Distribution and activity of ammonia oxidizing bacteria in a large full-scale trickling filter. Water Research, 2002, 36(6): 1439-1448
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[28]
Purkhold U, Pommerening-Röser A, Juretschko S, Schmid M C, Koops H P, Wagner M. Phylogeny of all recognized species of ammonia oxidizers based on comparative 16S rRNA and amoA sequence analysis: implications for molecular diversity surveys. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2000, 66(12): 5368-5382
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[29]
Luxmy B S, Nakajima F, Yamamoto K. Analysis of bacterial community in membrane- separation bioreactors by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) techniques. Water Science and Technology, 2000, 41(10-11): 259-268
[30]
Wagner M, Rath G, Koops H-P, Flood J, Amann R. In situ analysis of nitrifying bacteria in sewage treatment plants. Water Science and Technology, 1996, 34(1-2): 237-244
CrossRef Google scholar
[31]
Wang X, Wen X, Criddle C, Wells G, Zhang J, Zhao Y. Community analysis of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in activated sludge of eight wastewater treatment systems. Journal of Environmental Sciences (China), 2010, 22(4): 627-634
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[32]
Andrews JH, Harris RF. γ- and k- Selection and microbial ecology. Advances in Microbial Ecology, 1986, 9: 99-147
[33]
Schramm A, De Beer D, Gieseke A, Amann R. Microenvironments and distribution of nitrifying bacteria in a membrane-bound biofilm. Environmental Microbiology, 2000, 2(6): 680-686
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[34]
Stehr G, Bottcher B, Dittberner P, Rath G, Koops H P. The ammonia-oxidizing nitrifying population of the River Elbe estuary. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 1995, 17 (3): 177-186
CrossRef Google scholar
[35]
Hibiya K, Terada A, Tsuneda S, Hirata A. Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification by controlling vertical and horizontal microenvironment in a membrane-aerated biofilm reactor. Journal of Biotechnology, 2003, 100(1): 23-32
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[36]
Copp J B, Murphy K. Estimation of the active nitrifying biomass in activated sludge. Water Research, 1995, 29(8): 1855-1862
CrossRef Google scholar
[37]
Daims H, Ramsing N B, Schleifer K H, Wagner M. Cultivation-independent, semiautomatic determination of absolute bacterial cell numbers in environmental samples by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2001, 67(12): 5810-5818
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[38]
Hagopian D S, Riley J G. A closer look at the bacteriology of nitrification. Aquacultural Engineering, 1998, 18(4): 223-244
CrossRef Google scholar
[39]
Koop H-P, Pommerening-Roser A. Distribution and ecophysiology of the nitrifying bacteria emphasizing cultured species. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 2001, 37 (1): 1-9
CrossRef Google scholar
[40]
Manser R. Population dynamics and kinetics of nitrifying bacteria in membrane and conventional activated sludge plants. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, 2005

Acknowledgements

Funding for this research was provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 20921140094) and the the Knowledge Innovation Project of Chinese Academy of Sciences (KSCX2-YW-G-054).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(168 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/