Characteristics of night soil and leaf co-composting using aerobic static method

Xiaojie SUN, Dunqiu WANG, Wenjing LU, Hongtao WANG

PDF(239 KB)
PDF(239 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2012, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (3) : 421-427. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-011-0380-9
RESEARCH ARTICLE
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Characteristics of night soil and leaf co-composting using aerobic static method

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The main purpose of this work is to investigate the characteristics of night soil and leaf co-composting using aerobic static composting method. Three influencing factors, including proportion of night soil and leaf, aeration rate and aeration pattern, were investigated through the evolution of the principal physicochemical properties, i.e., temperature, oxygen consumption rate, organic matters, moisture content, carbon, nitrogen, carbon-to-nitrogen ratio and Germination index (GI). It was found that the 3∶1 (w∶w) mixture of night soil and leaf was capable of achieving the highest composting temperature, longest retention time of high temperature (55°C), and fastest organic matter degradation. The 0.14 m3·min-1·m-3 aeration rate was most beneficial to composting, and the mixture of night soil and leaf maintained the highest temperature for the longest duration and achieved the highest CO2 content and GI. The continuous aeration pattern during composting was superior to an intermittent aeration pattern, since the latter delayed the composting process.

Keywords

night soil / leaf / aerobic compost / aeration rate / aeration pattern

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiaojie SUN, Dunqiu WANG, Wenjing LU, Hongtao WANG. Characteristics of night soil and leaf co-composting using aerobic static method. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2012, 6(3): 421‒427 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-011-0380-9

References

[1]
LuY, WuX, GuoJ. Characteristics of municipal solid waste and sewage sludge co-composting.Waste Management (New York), 2009, 29(3): 1152–1157
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[2]
TremierA, de GuardiaA, MassianiC, PaulE, MartelJ L. A respirometric method for characterising the organic composition and biodegradation kinetics and the temperature influence on the biodegradation kinetics, for a mixture of sludge and bulking agent to be co-composted.Bioresource Technology, 2005, 96(2): 169–180
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[3]
BanegasV, MorenoJ L, MorenoJ I, GarcíaC, LeónG, HernándezT. Composting anaerobic and aerobic sewage sludges using two proportions of sawdust.Waste Management (New York), 2007, 27(10): 1317–1327
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[4]
de GuardiaA, PetiotC, RogeauD, DruilheC. Influence of aeration rate on nitrogen dynamics during composting.Waste Management (New York), 2008, 28(3): 575–587
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[5]
WongJ W C, MakK F, ChanN W, LamA, FangM, ZhouL X, WuQ T, LiaoX D. Co-composting of soybean residues and leaves in Hong Kong.Bioresource Technology, 2001, 76(2): 99–106
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[6]
EkinciK, KeenerH M, AkbolatD. Effects of feedstock, airflow rate, and recirculation ratio on performance of composting systems with air recirculation.Bioresource Technology, 2006, 97(7): 922–932
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[7]
LiangY, LeonardJ J, FeddesJ J R, McGillW B. Influence of carbon and buffer amendment on ammonia volatilization in composting.Bioresource Technology, 2006, 97(5): 748–761
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[8]
MeunchangS, PanichsakpatanaS, WeaverR W. Co-composting of filter cake and bagasse; by-products from a sugar mill.Bioresource Technology, 2005, 96(4): 437–442
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[9]
LiX J, ZhangR H, PangY Z. Characteristics of dairy manure composting with rice straw.Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(2): 359–367
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[10]
ZubillagaM S, LavadoR S. Stability indexes of sewage sludge compost obtained with different proportions of a bulking agent. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 2003, 34(3-4): 581–591
CrossRef Google scholar
[11]
EftodaG, Mc CartneyD. Determining the critical bulking agent requirement for municipal biosolids composting.Compost Science & Utilization, 2004, 12(3): 208–218
[12]
RasapoorM, NasrabadiT, KamaliM, HoveidiH. The effects of aeration rate on generated compost quality, using aerated static pile method.Waste Management (New York), 2009, 29(2): 570–573
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[13]
ThemelisN J, KimY H. Material and energy balances in a large-scale aerobic bioconversion cell.Waste Management Research, 2002, 20(3): 234–242
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[14]
EkinciK, KeenerH M, ElwellD L, MichelF C. Effects of aeration strategies on the composting process: Part I, Experimental studies.Transactions of the ASAE, 2004, 47(5): 1697–1708
[15]
HongJ H, KeenerH M, ElwellD L. Preliminary study of the effect of continuous and intermittent aeration on composting hog manure amended with sawdust. Compost Science & Utilization, 1998, 6(3): 74–88
[16]
ElwellD L, BorgerD C, BlahoD V, FahrniJ K, KeenerH M, WillettL B. Changes in concentrations of malodorous compounds during controlled aeration composting. Compost Science & Utilization, 2004, 12(2): 102–107
[17]
KoH J, KimK Y, KimH T, KimC N, UmedaM. Evaluation of maturity parameters and heavy metal contents in composts made from animal manure.Waste Management (New York), 2008, 28(5): 813–820
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[18]
de BertoldiM, FerrantiM P, L’HermiteP, ZucconiF. Compost: Production, Quality and Use, Elsevier Applied Science. London: Elsevier, 1986, 852
[19]
BertranE, SortX, SolivaM, TrillasI. Composting winery waste: Sludges and grape stalks.Bioresource Technology, 2004, 95(2): 203–208
CrossRef Pubmed Google scholar
[20]
TiquiaS M, TamN F Y. Elimination of phytotoxicity during co-composting of spent pig-manure sawdust litter and pig sludge.Bioresource Technology, 1998, 65(1–2): 43–49
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
ImbeahM. Composting piggery waste: a review.Bioresource Technology, 1998, 63(3): 197–203
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
StentifordE I. Composting control: Principles and practice. In: de BertoldiM, SequiP, LemmesB, PapiT, eds. The Science of Composting, Part 1. Glasgow: Blackie, 1996, 56–59
[23]
USEPA. Control of pathogens in municipal wastewater sludge for land application. In: Center for Environmental Research Information. Environmental Regulations and Technology EPA/625/10–89/006. Cincinnati, OH 45268, 1989, 71
[24]
GoluekeC G, DiazL F. Historical review: Composting and its role in municipal waste management. In: de BertoldiM, SequiP, LemmesB, PapiT, eds. The Science of Composting, Part 1. Glasgow: Blackie, 1996, 3–14
[25]
TchobanoglousG, TheisenH, VigilS. Integrated Solid Waste Management: Engineering Principles and Management Issues. New York: McGraw-Hill Science Engineering, 1993, 686–687
[26]
ChoiW, ChangS. Nitrogen dynamics in co-composted drilling wastes: Effects of compost quality and 15N fertilization. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 2005, 37(12): 2297–2305
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
MorelJ L, ColinF, GermonJ C, GodinP, JusteC. Methods for the evaluation of the maturity of municipal refuse compost. In: Gasser J K R, ed. Composting of Agricultural and Other Wastes. London: Elsevier,1985, 56–72
CrossRef Google scholar
[28]
Ministry of Urban and Rural Construction and Environmental Protection. Control Standards for Pollutants in Sludge from Agricultural Use, GB4284–84. Beijing, 1984 (in Chinese)
[29]
State Bureau of Environmental Protection. Control Standards for Urban Wastes for Agricultural Use, GB8172–87. Beijing, 1987 (in Chinese)

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Hi-tech Olympics Special Program of the National Sci & Tech. Supporting Program of China (No. 2007BAK1211), Guangxi Scientific Research and Technological Development Program (GuiKeGong 10123010-16), and the Program to Sponsor Teams for Innovation in the Construction of Talent Highlands in Guangxi Institutions of Higher Learning (GuiKeRen 2007-71).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(239 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/