Enhancement of sludge gravitational thickening with weak ultrasound

Abstract

Gravitational thickening is the prevailing method to reduce sludge volume but the process is slow and usually requires addition of polyelectrolyte(s). This paper investigated the potential benefits of sonication on enhancing the sludge gravitational thickening with very low energy dose, so called “weak ultrasound”. Results showed that weak sonication significantly changed the sludge settlability and the main mechanism was release of the loosely bounded extracellular polymeric substances. The changes in sludge behaviors by sonication were strongly influenced by power density and sonication duration. Lower sound frequency was slightly better than higher frequency. Weak sonication (<680 kJ·kg^-1 DS) improved the sludge gravitational thickening while high ultrasonic energy deteriorated the process. Considering both the sludge thickening efficiency and energy consumption, the optimum conditions were 0.15 W·mL^-1, 7 s, and 25 kHz. Under such conditions, the energy dose was only 155 kJ·kg^-1 DS, much lower than literature reports, and the sludge settling time was shortened from 24 h to 12h. Weak sonication could substitute expensive polyelectrolyte coagulant for sludge thickening. Combination of weak sonication and polyelectrolyte could further reduce the settling time to 6 h. The final water content of the thickened sludge was not changed after sonication or polyelectrolyte addition.

Keywords

activated sludge / sonication / settlability / dry weight / extracellular polymeric substances / polyelectrolyte

References

[1] Chen Y G, Yang H Z, Gu G W. Effect of acid and surfactant treatment on activated sludge dewatering and settling. Water Research, 2001, 35(11): 2615–2620

[2] Yin X, Han P F, Lu X P, Wang Y R. A review on the dewaterability of bio-sludge and ultrasound pretreatment. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2004, 11(6): 337–348

[3] Feng X, Deng J C, Lei H Y, Bai T, Fan Q J, Li Z X. Dewaterability of waste activated sludge with ultrasound conditioning. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(3): 1074–1081

[4] Yasuhiko W, Kazuhiro T. Innovative sludge handing through pelletization/thickening. Water Research, 1999, 33(15): 3245–3252

[5] SWSDE. Guide of Water and Wastewater Treatment Design. 2nd ed. Beijing: Chinese Arch Eng Publishing Company, 2001

[6] Suslick K S. Sonochemistry. Science, 1990, 247(4949): 1439–1445

[7] Chu C P, Chang B V, Liao G S, Jean D S, Lee D J. Observations on changes in ultrasonically treated waste-activated sludge. Water Research, 2001, 35(4): 1038–1046

[8] Gonze E, Pillot S, Valette E, Gonthier Y, Bernis A. Ultrasonic treatment of an aerobic activated sludge in a batch reactor. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 2003, 42(12): 965–975

[9] Bougrier C, Albasi C, Delgenes J P, Carrere H. Effect of ultrasonic, thermal and ozone pre-treatments on waste activated sludge solubilisation and anaerobic biodegradability. Chemical Engineering and Processing, 2006, 45(8): 711–718

[10] Tiehm A, Nickel K, Zellhorn M, Neis U. Ultrasonic waste activated sludge disintegration for improving anaerobic stabilization. Water Research, 2001, 35(8): 2003–2009

[11] Nickel K, Neis U. Ultrasonic disintegration of biosolids for improved biodegradation. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2007, 14(4): 450–455

[12] Yin X, Lu X P, Han P F, Wang Y R. Ultrasonic treatment on activated sewage sludge from petro-plant for reduction. Ultrasonics, 2006, 44(supplement): E397–E399

[13] Na S, Kim Y U, Khim J. Physiochemical properties of digested sewage sludge with ultrasonic treatment. Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2007, 14(3): 281–285

[14] Bien J, Wolny L. Changes of some sewage sludge parameters prepared with an ultrasonic field. Water Science and Technology, 1997, 36(11): 101–106

[15] Kim Y U,Kim B I.Effect of ultrasound on dewaterability of sewage sludge. Japanese Journal of Applied Physiscs. Part 1, 2003, 42: 5898–5899

[16] Riera-Franco de Sarabia E, Gallego-Juarez J A, Rodriguez-Corral G, Elvira-Segura L, Gonzalez-Gomez I. Application of high-power ultrasound to enhance fluid/solid particle separation processes. Ultrasonics, 2000, 38(1-8): 642–646

[17] Bien J, Wolny L. Changes of some sewage sludge parameters prepared with an ultrasonic eld. Water Science and Technology, 1997, 36(11): 101–106

[18] Wang F, Wang Y, Ji M.Mechanisms and kinetics models for ultrasonic waste activated sludge disintegration. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2005, 123(1–3): 145–150

[19] Dewil R, Baeyens J, Goutvrind R. The use of ultrasonics in the treatment of waste activated sludge. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2006, 14(1): 105–113

[20] Wang F. Influence of ultrasonic disintegration on sludge characteristics and zero waste activated sludge production process. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Tianjin: Tianjin University, 2006 (in Chinese)

[21] Andrew D E, Mary A H. Standards Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th ed. Washington D C: American Public Health Association, 1998

[22] Hua I, Hoffmann M R. Optimization of ultrasonic irradiation as an advanced oxidation technology. Environmental Science & Technology, 1997, 31(8): 2237–2243

[23] Schläfer O, Onyeche T, Bormann H, Schroder C, Sievers M. Ultrasound stimulation of micro-organisms for enhanced biodegradation. Ultrasonics, 2002, 40(1–8): 25–29

[24] Mikkelsen L H. The shear sensitivity of activated sludge - Relations to filterability, rheology and surface chemistry. Colloid and Surface A, 2001, 182(1–3): 1–14

[25] Emir E, Erdincler A. The role of compatibility in liquid-solid separation of wastewater sludges. Water Science and Technology, 2006, 53(7): 121–126

[26] Keiding K, Nielsen P H. Desorption of organic macromolecules from activated sludge: Effect of ionic composition. Water Research, 1997, 31(7): 1665–1672

[27] Zhang P Y, Zhang G M, Wang W. Ultrasonic treatment of biological sludge: Floc disintegration, cell lysis and inactivation. Bioresource Technology, 2007, 98(1): 207–210

[28] Kopp J, Dichtl N. Prediction of full-scale dewatering results by determining the water distribution of sewage sludges. Water Science and Technology, 2001, 42(11): 141–149

Acknowledgements

Authors thank financial supports from Furong Scholar Plan of Hunan Province, China and the State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment (No. QA200903). We also thank Dr. Ajay Kumar for English polishing.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg