Influence of aeration intensity on the performance of A/O-type sequencing batch MBR system treating azo dye wastewater

Abstract

Among the numerous parameters affecting the membrane bioreactor (MBR) performance, the aeration intensity is one of the most important factors. In the present investigation, an anoxic/aerobic-type (A/O-type) sequencing batch MBR system, added anoxic process as a pretreatment to improve the biodegradability of azo dye wastewater, was investigated under different aeration intensities and the impact of the aeration intensity on effluent quantity, sludge properties, extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) amount generated as well as the change of permeation flux were examined. Neither lower nor higher aeration intensities could improve A/O-type sequencing batch MBR performances. The results showed 0.15 m³·h^-1 aeration intensity was promising for treatment of azo dye wastewater under the conditions examined. Under this aeration intensity, chemical oxygen demand (COD), ammonium nitrogen and color removal as well as membrane flux amounted to 97.8%, 96.5%, 98.7% and 6.21 L·m^-2·h^-1, respectively. The effluent quality, with 25.0 mg·L^-1COD, 0.84 mg·L^-1 ammonium nitrogen and 8 chroma, could directly meet the reuse standard in China. In the meantime, the sludge relative hydrophobicity, the bound EPS, soluble EPS and EPS amounts contained in the membrane fouling layer were 70.3%, 52.0 mg·g^-1VSS, 38.8 mg·g^-1VSS and 90.8 mg·g^-1VSS, respectively, which showed close relationships to both pollutant removals and membrane flux.

Keywords

batch membrane bioreactor / azo dye / aeration intensity / extracellular polymeric substances / sludge properties

References

[1] Badani Z, Ait-Amar H, Si-Salah A, Brik M, Fuchs W. Treatment of textile waste water by membrane bioreactor and reuse. Desalination, 2005, 185: 411–417

[2] Cristina M, Maria T P, Maria C F. Biotransformation of industrial reactive azo dyes by Geotrichum sp. CCMI 1019. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2003, 32: 145–151

[3] Carliell C M, Barclay S J, Naidoo N, Buckley C A, Mulholland D A, Senior E. Microbial decolourisation of a reactive azo dye under anaerobic conditions. Water South Africa, 1995, 21: 61–69

[4] Brown D, Hamburger B. The degradation of dyestuffs: part III-investigations of their ultimate degradability. Chemosphere, 1987, 16: 1539–1553

[5] Brik M, Schoeberl P, Chamam B, Braun R, Fuchs W. Advanced treatment of textile wastewater towards reuse using a membrane bioreactor. Process Biochemistry, 2006, 41: 1751–1757

[6] Rott U, Minke R. Overview of wastewater treatment and recycling in the textile processing industry. Water Science and Technology, 1999, 40: 137–144

[7] Malpei F, Bonomo L, Rozzi A. Feasibility study to upgrade a textile wastewater treatment plant by a hollow fibre membrane bioreactor for effluent reuse. Water Science and Technology, 2003, 47(10): 33–39

[8] Meng F, Yang F, Shi B, Zhang H. A comprehensive study on membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors operated under different aeration intensities. Separation and Purification Technology, 2008, 59: 91–100

[9] Peng D, Bernet N, Delgenes J P, Moletta R. Aerobic granular sludge–a case report. Water Research, 1999, 33: 890–893

[10] Biggs C A, Lant P A. Activated sludge flocculation: online determination of flocsize and the effect of shear. Water Research, 2000, 34: 2542–2550

[11] Liu Y, Tay J H. The essential role of hydrodynamic shear force in the formation of biofilm and granular sludge. Water Research, 2002, 36(7): 1653–1665

[12] Wang Z P, Liu L L, Yao J, Cai W M. Effects of extracellular polymeric substances on aerobic granulation in sequencing batch reactors. Chemosphere, 2006, 63(10): 1728–1735

[13] Li X F, Li Y J, Liu H, Hua Z Z, Du G C, Chen J. Correlation between Extracellular polymeric substances and aerobic biogranulation in membrane bioreactor. Separation and Purification Technology, 2008, 59: 26–33

[14] Khehra M S, Saini H S, Sharma D K, Chadha B D, Chimni S S. Biodegradation of azo dye C.I. Acid Red 88 by an anoxic-aerobic sequential bioreactor. Dyes and Pigments, 2006, 70: 1–7

[15] Elisangela F, Andrea Z, Fabiana F G, Isis S S, Artur C P, Lucia R D. Microaerophilic-aerobic sequential decolourization/biodegradation of textile azo dyes by a facultative Klebsiella sp. Strain VN-31. Process Biochemistry, 2009, 44: 446–452

[16] Liu H, Fang H H P. Extraction of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) of sludges. Journal of Biotechnology, 2002, 95(3): 249–256

[17] NEPA. Water and Wastewater Monitoring Methods, 3rd ed. Beijing: Chinese Environmental Science Publishing House, 1997

[18] Weatherburn M W. Phenol hypochlorite reaction for determination of ammonia. Analytical Chemistry, 1957, 39: 971–974

[19] Dubois M, Gilles K A, Hamilton J K, Rebers P A, Smith F. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substance. Analytical Chemistry, 1956, 28: 350–356

[20] Gerhardt P, Murray R G E, Wood W A, Krieg N R. Methods for General and Molecular Bacteriology. Washington: American Society for Microbiology, 1994

[21] Bradford M M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Analytical Biochemistry, 1976, 72: 248–254

[22] Chang I, Lee C. Membrane filtration characteristics in membrane-coupled activated sludge system–the effect of physiological states of activated sludge on membrane fouling. Desalination, 1998, 120: 221–233

[23] Tan N C G, Borger A, Slenders P, Svitelskaya A, Lettinga G, Field J A. Degradation of azo dye mordant yellow 10 in a sequential anaerobic and bioaugmented aerobic bioreactor. Water Science and Technology, 2000, 42: 337–344

[24] Brás R, Ferra M I, Pinheiro H M, Cabral Gonçalves I. Batch tests for assessing decolourisation of azo dyes by methanogenic and mixed cultures. Journal of Biotechnology, 2001, 89(2-3): 155–162

[25] van der Zee F P, Villaverde S. Combined anaerobic-aerobic treatment of azo dyes—a short review of bioreactor studies. Water Research, 2005, 39(8): 1425–1440

[26] Coughlin M F, Kinkle B K, Bishop P L. High performance degradation of azo dye Acid Orange 7 and sulfanilic acid in a laboratory scale reactor after seeding with cultured bacterial strains. Water Research, 2003, 37(11): 2757–2763

[27] Yun M A, Yeon K M, Park J S, Lee C H, Chun J, Lim D J. Characterization of biofilm structure and its effect on membrane permeability in MBR for dye wastewater treatment. Water Research, 2006, 40(1): 45–52

[28] Zhang H F, Sun B S, Zhao X H, Xu Y H, Qi G S. Effect of aeration intensity on the filterability of mixed liquor in membrane bioreactor. Environmental Sciences, 2008, 29(10): 2777–2782 (in Chinese)

[29] Li Y J, Li X F, Hua Z Z, Liu H, Chen J. Production of extracellular polymeric substances from aerobic granular sludge and its distribution. Environmental Chemistry, 2006, 25(4): 439–443 (in Chinese)

[30] Huang X, Liu R, Qian Y. Behavior of soluble microbial products in a membrane bioreactor. Process Biochemistry, 2000, 36: 401–406

[31] Rosenberger S, Evenblij H, Poele S T, Wintgens T, Laabs C. The importance of liquid phase analyses to understand fouling in membrane assisted activated sludge processes-six case studies of different European research groups. Journal of Membrane Science, 2005, 263: 113–126

[32] Geng Z, Hall E R. A comparative study of fouling-related properties of sludge from conventional and membrane enhanced biological phosphorus removal processes. Water Research, 2007, 41(19): 4329–4338

[33] Jeong T Y, Cha G C, Yoo I K, Kim D J. Characteristics of bio-fouling in a submerged MBR. Desalination, 2007, 207: 107–113

[34] Drews A, Vocks M, Bracklow U, Iversen V, Kraume M. Does fouling in MBRs sepend on SMP? Desalination, 2008, 231: 141–149

[35] Paul P, Hartung C. Modelling of biological fouling propensity by inference in a side stream membrane bioreactor. Desalination, 2008, 224: 154–159

[36] Han S S, Bae T H, Jang G C, Tak T M. Influence of sludge retention time on membrane fouling and bioactivities in membrane bioreactor system. Process Biochemistry, 2005, 40: 2393–2400

[37] Liao B Q, Allen D G, Droppo I G, Leppard G G, Liss S N. Surface properties of sludge and their role in bioflocculation and settleability. Water Research, 2001, 35(2): 339–350

[38] Lee W, Kang S, Shin H. Sludge characteristics and their contribution to microfiltration in submerged membrane bioreactors. Journal of Membrane Science, 2003, 216: 217–227

[39] Yu H Y, Xie Y J, Hu M X, Wang J L, Wang S Y, Xu Z K. Surface modification of polypropylene microporous membrane to improve its antifouling property in MBR: CO₂ plasma treatment. Journal of Membrane Science, 2005, 254: 219–227

[40] Meng F, Chae S R, Drews A, Kraume M, Shin H S, Yang F. Recent advances in membrane bioreactors (MBRs): membrane fouling and membrane material. Water Research, 2009, 43(6): 1489–1512

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 50678073), the Tai-Lake Water Specific Program of Jiangsu Province (No. BS2007125) and the Scientifically and Technologically Supported Program of Jiangsu Province (No. BE2009636).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg