Physical and chemical processes of wintertime secondary nitrate aerosol formation

Qi YING

PDF(404 KB)
PDF(404 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2011, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (3) : 348-361. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-011-0343-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Physical and chemical processes of wintertime secondary nitrate aerosol formation

Author information +
History +

Abstract

The UCD/CIT model was modified to include a process analysis (PA) scheme for gas and particulate matter (PM) to study the formation of secondary nitrate aerosol during a stagnant wintertime air pollution episode during the California Regional PM2.5/PM10 Air Quality Study (CRPAQS) where detailed measurements of PM components are available at a few sites. Secondary nitrate is formed in the urban areas from near the ground to a few hundred meters above the surface during the day with a maximum modeled net increase rate of 4 μg·m-3·d-1 during the study episode. The secondary nitrate formation rate in rural areas is lower due to lower NO2. In the afternoon hours, near-surface temperature can be high enough to evaporate the particulate nitrate. In the nighttime hours, both the gas phase N2O5 reactions with water vapor and the N2O5 heterogeneous reactions with particle-bound water are important for secondary nitrate formation. The N2O5 reactions are most import near the surface to a few hundred meters above surface with a maximum modeled net secondary nitrate increase rate of 1 μg·m-3·d-1 and are more significant in the rural areas where the O3 concentrations are high at night. In general, vertical transport during the day moves the nitrate formed near the surface to higher elevations. During the stagnant days, process analysis indicates that the nitrate concentration in the upper air builds up and leads to a net downward flux of nitrate through vertical diffusion and a rapid increase of surface nitrate concentration.

Keywords

secondary nitrate aerosol / N2O5 heterogeneous reaction / process analysis

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Qi YING. Physical and chemical processes of wintertime secondary nitrate aerosol formation. Front Envir Sci Eng Chin, 2011, 5(3): 348‒361 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-011-0343-1

References

[1]
Herner J D, Aw J, Gao O, Chang D P, Kleeman M J. Size and composition distribution of airborne particulate matter in northern California: I—particulate mass, carbon, and water-soluble ions. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2005, 55(1): 30-51
[2]
Harrison R M, Deacon A R, Jones M R. Sources and processes affecting concentrations of PM10 and PM2.5 particulate matter in Birmingham (UK). Atmospheric Environment, 1997, 31(24): 4103-4117
CrossRef Google scholar
[3]
Lonati G, Giugliano M, Butelli P, Romele L, Tardivo R. Major chemical components of PM2.5 in Milan (Italy). Atmospheric Environment, 2005, 39(10): 1925-1934
CrossRef Google scholar
[4]
Celis J E, Morales J R, Zaror C A, Inzunza J C. A study of the particulate matter PM10 composition in the atmosphere of Chillan, Chile. Chemosphere, 2004, 54(4): 541-550
CrossRef Google scholar
[5]
Seinfeld J H, Pandis S N. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change. 2006, New York: Wiley-Interscience
[6]
Foley K M, Roselle S J, Appel K W , Bhave P V, Pleim J E, Otte T L, Mathur R, Sarwar G, Young J O, Gilliam R C, Nolte C G, Kelly J T, Gilliland A B, Bash J O. Incremental testing of the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system version 4.7. Geoscientific Model Development, 2010, 3(1): 205-226
CrossRef Google scholar
[7]
Riemer N, Vogel H, Vogel B, Schell B, Ackermann I, Kessler C, Hass H. Impact of the heterogeneous hydrolysis of N2O5 on chemistry and nitrate aerosol formation in the lower troposphere under photosmog conditions. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 2003, 108(D4)
[8]
Bertram T H, Thornton J A. Toward a general parameterization of N2O5 reactivity on aqueous particles: the competing effects of particle liquid water, nitrate and chloride. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2009, 9(21): 8351-8363
CrossRef Google scholar
[9]
Chang W L, Bhave P V, Brown S S, Riemer N, Stutz J, Dabdub D. Heterogeneous Atmospheric chemistry, ambient measurements, and model calculations of N2O5: a review. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2011, 45(6): 655-685
CrossRef Google scholar
[10]
Stutz J, Alicke B, Ackermann R, Geyer A, White A, Williams E. Vertical profiles of NO3, N2O5, O3, and NOx in the nocturnal boundary layer: 1. Observations during the Texas air quality study 2000. Journal of Geophysical Research—Atmospheres, 2004, 109(D12)
[11]
Jang J C C, Jeffries H E, Tonnesen S. Sensitivity of ozone to model grid resolution-II. Detailed process analysis for ozone chemistry. Atmospheric Environment, 1995, 29(21): 3101-3114
CrossRef Google scholar
[12]
Herner J D, Ying Q, Aw J, Gao O, Chang D P Y, Kleeman M J. Dominant mechanisms that shape the airborne particle size and composition distribution in central California. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2006, 40(10): 827-844
CrossRef Google scholar
[13]
Zhang, Y, Wen X Y, Wang K, Vijayaraghavan K, Jacobson M Z. Probing into regional O-3 and particulate matter pollution in the United States: 2. An examination of formation mechanisms through a process analysis technique and sensitivity study. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 2009, 114
[14]
Kleeman M J, Cass G R. A 3D Eulerian source-oriented model for an externally mixed aerosol. Environmental Science & Technology, 2001, 35(24): 4834-4848
CrossRef Google scholar
[15]
Ying Q, Kleeman M J. Source contributions to the regional distribution of secondary particulate matter in California. Atmospheric Environment, 2006, 40(4): 736-752
CrossRef Google scholar
[16]
Ying Q, Lu J, Allen P, Livingstone P, Kaduwela A, Kleeman M J. Modeling air quality during the California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study (CRPAQS) using the UCD/CIT source-oriented air quality model-Part I. Base case model results. Atmospheric Environment, 2008, 42: 8954-8966
CrossRef Google scholar
[17]
Ghosal S, Hemminger J C. Surface adsorbed water on NaCl and its effect on nitric acid reactivity with NaCl powders. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2004, 108(37): 14102-14108
CrossRef Google scholar
[18]
Zhang Y, Liu P, Liu X H , Pun B , Seigneur C , Jacobson M Z , Wang W X. Fine scale modeling of wintertime aerosol mass, number, and size distributions in central California. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 2010, 115
[19]
Pun B K, Balmori R T F, Seigneur C. Modeling wintertime particulate matter formation in central California. Atmospheric Environment, 2009, 43(2): 402-409
CrossRef Google scholar
[20]
Livingstone P L, Magliano K, Gürer K, Allen P D, Zhang K M, Ying Q, Jackson B S, Kaduwela A, Kleeman M, Woodhouse L F, Turkiewicz K, Horowitz L W, Scott K, Johnson D, Taylor C,O’Brien G, DaMassa J, Croes B E, Binkowski F, Byun D. Simulating PM concentration during a winter episode in a subtropical valley: Sensitivity simulations and evaluation methods. Atmospheric Environment, 2009, 43(37): 5971-5977
CrossRef Google scholar
[21]
Ying Q, Lu J, Kaduwela A, Kleeman M. Modeling air quality during the California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study (CPRAQS) using the UCD/CIT Source Oriented Air Quality Model-Part II. Regional source apportionment of primary airborne particulate matter. Atmospheric Environment, 2008, 42(39): 8967-8978
CrossRef Google scholar
[22]
Chen J J, Ying Q, Kleeman M J. Source apportionment of wintertime secondary organic aerosol during the California regional PM10/PM2.5 air quality study. Atmospheric Environment, 2010, 44(10): 1331-1340
CrossRef Google scholar
[23]
Ying Q, Kleeman M. Regional contributions to airborne particulate matter in central California during a severe pollution episode. Atmospheric Environment, 2009, 43(6): 1218-1228
CrossRef Google scholar
[24]
Goodin W R, McRae G J, Seinfeld J H. Comparison of interpolation methods for sparse data-application to wind and concentration fields. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 1979, 18(6): 761-771
CrossRef Google scholar
[25]
Goodin W R, McRae G J, Seinfeld J H. Objective analysis technique for constructing 3-dimensional urban-scale wind fields . Journal of Applied Meteorology, 1980, 19(1): 98-108
CrossRef Google scholar
[26]
Held T, Ying Q, Kaduwela A, Kleeman M. Modeling particulate matter in the San Joaquin Valley with a source-oriented externally mixed three-dimensional photochemical grid model. Atmospheric Environment, 2004, 38(22): 3689-3711
CrossRef Google scholar
[27]
Judith C, John W, Douglas L, Susanne H. Particulate nitrate measurements duringCRPAQS. 2004, Desert Research Institute, Aerosol Dynamics In: Reno, NV, Berkeley CA.
[28]
Ying Q, Lu J, Kleeman M J. Modeling air quality during the California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study (CRPAQS) using the UCD/CIT source oriented air quality model-part III. Regional source apportionment of secondary and total airborne particulate matter. Atmospheric Environment, 2009, 43: 419-430
CrossRef Google scholar
[29]
Evans M J, Jacob D J. Impact of new laboratory studies of N2O5 hydrolysis on global model budgets of tropospheric nitrogen oxides, ozone, and OH. Geophysical Research Letters, 2005, 32(9): L09813

Acknowledgements

This research was partially supported by the California Air Resources Board and the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency under contract 2000–2005 PM. The statements, opinions, findings, and conclusions of this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the California Air Resources Board.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(404 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/