Interaction and independence on methane oxidation of landfill cover soil among three impact factors: water, oxygen and ammonium

Abstract

To understand the influence patterns and interactions of three important environmental factors, i.e. soil water content, oxygen concentration, and ammonium addition, on methane oxidation, the soils from landfill cover layers were incubated under full factorial parameter settings. In addition to the methane oxidation rate, the quantities and community structures of methanotrophs were analyzed to determine the methane oxidation capacity of the soils. Canonical correspondence analysis was utilized to distinguish the important impact factors. Water content was found to be the most important factor influencing the methane oxidation rate and Type II methanotrophs, and the optimum value was 15% (w/w), which induced methane oxidation rates 10- and 6- times greater than those observed at 5% (w/w) and 20% (w/w), respectively. Ambient oxygen conditions were more suitable for methane oxidation than 3% oxygen. The addition of 100mg-N·{kg}_{drysoil}^{-1} of ammonium induced different effects on methane oxidation capacity when conducted at low or high water content. With regard to the methanotrophs, Type II was sensitive to the changes of water content, while Type I was influenced by oxygen content. Furthermore, the methanotrophic acidophile, Verrucomicrobia, was detected in soils with a pH of 4.9, which extended their known living environments.

Keywords

quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) / denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) / principal component analysis (PCA) / canonical correspondence analysis (CCA)

References

[1] Mikaloff Fletcher S E, Tans P P, Bruhwiler L M, Miller J B, Heimann M (2004). CH₄ sources estimated from atmospheric observations of CH₄ and its ¹³C/¹²C isotopic ratios: 1. Inverse modeling of source processes. Global Biogeochem Cycles, 18(4): GB4004.1–GB4004.17

[2] Hanson R S, Hanson T E (1996). Methanotrophic bacteria. Microbiol Rev, 60(2): 439–471

[3] Shao L M, Zhong J S, Zhang H H, He P J (2009). CH₄ emissions from municipal solid waste landfills in spring and summer and influencing factors analysis. Research of Environmental Sciences(in Chinese), 22: 83–88

[4] Bodelier P L E, Hahn A P, Arth I R, Frenzel P (2000). Effects of ammonium-based fertilisation on microbial processes involved in methane emission from soils planted with rice. Biogeochemistry, 51(3): 225–257

[5] Bodelier P L E, Meima-Franke M, Zwart G, Laanbroek H J (2005). New DGGE strategies for the analyses of methanotrophic microbial communities using different combinations of existing 16S rRNA-based primers. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 52(2): 163–174

[6] Bodelier P L E, Roslev P, Henckel T, Frenzel P (2000). Stimulation by ammonium-based fertilizers of methane oxidation in soil around rice roots. Nature, 403(6768): 421–424

[7] De Visscher A, Schippers M, van Cleemput O (2001). Short-term kinetic response of enhanced methane oxidation in landfill cover soils to environmental factors. Biol Fertil Soils, 33(3): 231–237

[8] Mohanty S R, Bodelier P L E, Floris V, Conrad R (2006). Differential effects of nitrogenous fertilizers on methane-consuming microbes in rice field and forest soils. Appl Environ Microbiol, 72(2): 1346–1354

[9] Saari A, Rinnan R, Martikainen P J (2004). Methane oxidation in boreal forest soils: kinetics and sensitivity to pH and ammonium. Soil Biol Biochem, 36(7): 1037–1046

[10] Seghers D, Top E M, Reheul D, Bulcke R, Boeckx P, Verstraete W, Siciliano S D (2003). Long-term effects of mineral versus organic fertilizers on activity and structure of the methanotrophic community in agricultural soils. Environ Microbiol, 5(10): 867–877

[11] Yu T, He P J, Lü F, Shao L M (2009). Mediating N₂O emissions from municipal solid waste landfills: Impacts of landfill operating conditions on community structure of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria in cover soils. Ecol Eng, 35(5): 882–889

[12] Wise M G, McArthur J V, Shimkets L J (1999). Methanotroph diversity in landfill soil: isolation of novel type I and type II methanotrophs whose presence was suggested by culture-independent 16S ribosomal DNA analysis. Appl Environ Microbiol, 65(11): 4887–4897

[13] Weisburg W G, Barns S M, Pelletier D A, Lane D J (1991). 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol, 173(2): 697–703

[14] Muyzer G, de Waal E C, Uitterlinden A G (1993). Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol, 59(3): 695–700

[15] Guo M, He P J, Lü F, Shao L M (2008). Type II methanotrophs community stucture in the cover soils of landfill. China Environ Sci, 28(6): 536–541 (in Chinese)

[16] Stralis-Pavese N, Sessitsch A, Weilharter A, Reichenauer T, Riesing J, Csontos J, Murrell J C, Bodrossy L (2004). Optimization of diagnostic microarray for application in analysing landfill methanotroph communities under different plant covers. Environ Microbiol, 6(4): 347–363

[17] Stralis Pavesea N, Bodrossya L, Reichenauerb TG, Weilhartera A, Sessitsch A (2006). 16S rRNA based T-RFLP analysis of methane oxidising bacteria - Assessment, critical evaluation of methodology performance and application for landfill site cover soils. Appl Soil Ecol, 31(3): 251–266

[18] Cébron A, Bodrossy L, Chen Y, Singer A C, Thompson I P, Prosser J I, Murrell J C (2007). Identity of active methanotrophs in landfill cover soil as revealed by DNA-stable isotope probing. FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 62(1): 12–23

[19] Dunfield P F, Yuryev A, Senin P, Smirnova A V, Stott M B, Hou S, Ly B, Saw J H, Zhou Z, Ren Y, Wang J, Mountain B W, Crowe M A, Weatherby T M, Bodelier P L E, Liesack W, Feng L, Wang L, Alam M (2007). Methane oxidation by an extremely acidophilic bacterium of the phylum Verrucomicrobia. Nature, 450(7171): 879–882

[20] Islam T, Jensen S, Reigstad L J, Larsen O, Birkeland N K (2008). Methane oxidation at 55°C and pH 2 by a thermoacidophilic bacterium belonging to the Verrucomicrobia phylum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 105(1): 300–304

[21] Pol A, Heijmans K, Harhangi H R, Tedesco D, Jetten M S M, Op den Camp H J M (2007). Methanotrophy below pH 1 by a new Verrucomicrobia species. Nature, 450(7171): 874–878

[22] Boeckx P, van Cleemput O (1996). Methane oxidation in a neutral landfill cover soil: Influence of moisture content, temperature, and nitrogen-turnover. J Environ Qual, 25(1): 178–183

[23] Whalen S C, Reeburgh W S, Sandbeck K A (1990). Rapid methane oxidation in a landfill cover soil. Appl Environ Microbiol, 56(11): 3405–3411

[24] Dörr H, Katru L, Levin I (1993). Soil texture parameterization of the methane uptake in aerated soils. Chemosphere, 26(1-4): 697–713

[25] Bender M, Conrad R (1995). Effect of CH₄ concentrations and soil conditions on the induction of CH₄ oxidation activity. Soil Biol Biochem, 27(12): 1517–1527

[26] Megraw S R, Konwles R (1987). Methane production and consumption in a cultivated humisol. Biol Fertil Soils, 5(1): 56–60

[27] Czepiel P M, Mosher B, Crill P M, Harriss R C (1996). Quantifying the effect of oxidation on landfill methane emissions. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres, 101(D11): 16721–16729

[28] Graham D W, Chaudhary J A, Hanson R S, Arnold R G (1993). Factors affecting competition between type I and type II methanotrophs in two-organism, continuous-flow reactors. Microb Ecol, 25(1): 1–17

[29] Schnell S, King G M (1996). Responses of methanotrophic activity in soils and cultures to water stress. Appl Environ Microbiol, 62(9): 3203–3209

[30] Mancinelli R L (1995). The regulation of methane oxidation in soil. Annu Rev Microbiol, 49(1): 581–605

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the National Key Technology R&D Program of China (No.2006BAJ04A06) and the National High-Tech Research and Development Program (863 Program) of China (No.2003AA644020).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg