Effects of a diesel oxidation catalyst on gaseous pollutants and fine particles from an engine operating on diesel and biodiesel
Xiaoyan SHI, Kebin HE, Weiwei SONG, Xingtong WANG, Jihua TAN
Effects of a diesel oxidation catalyst on gaseous pollutants and fine particles from an engine operating on diesel and biodiesel
The effects of a diesel oxidation catalytic (DOC) converter on diesel engine emissions were investigated on a diesel bench at various loads for two steady-state speeds using diesel fuel and B20. The DOC was very effective in hydrocarbon (HC) and CO oxidation. Approximately 90%–95% reduction in CO and 36%–70% reduction in HC were realized using the DOC. Special attention was focused on the effects of the DOC on elemental carbon (EC) and organic carbon (OC) fractions in fine particles (PM2.5) emitted from the diesel engine. The carbonaceous compositions of PM2.5 were analyzed by the method of thermal/optical reflectance (TOR). The results showed that total carbon (TC), OC and EC emissions for PM2.5 from diesel fuel were generally reduced by the DOC. For diesel fuel, TC emissions decreased 22%–32% after the DOC depending on operating modes. The decrease in TC was attributed to 35%–97% decrease in OC and 3%–65% decrease in EC emissions. At low load, a significant increase in the OC/EC ratio of PM2.5 was observed after the DOC. The effect of the DOC on the carbonaceous compositions in PM2.5 from B20 showed different trends compared to diesel fuel. At low load, a slight increase in EC emissions and a significant decrease in OC/EC ratio of PM2.5 after DOC were observed for B20.
diesel oxidation catalyst (DOC) / diesel particulate matters / elemental carbon (EC) / organic carbon (OC) / biodiesel
[1] |
Maricq M M. Chemical characterization of particulate emissions from diesel engines: a review. Aerosol Science, 2007, 38(11): 1079–1118
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[2] |
US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Health effects assessment document for diesel engine exhaust. EPA/600/8-90/057F, 2002
|
[3] |
Shi J P, Mark D, Harrison R M. Characterization of particles from a current technology heavy-duty diesel engine. Environmental Science & Technology, 2000, 34(5): 748–755
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[4] |
Ålander T A, Leskinen A, Raunemaa T, Rantanen L. Characterization of diesel particles: effects of fuel reformulation, exhaust aftertreatment and engine operation on particle carbon composition and volatility. Environmental Science & Technology, 2004, 38(9): 2707–2714
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[5] |
Shah S D, Cocker D R III, Miller J W, Norbeck J M. Emission rates of particulate matter and elemental and organic carbon from in-use diesel engines. Environmental Science & Technology, 2004, 38(9): 2544–2550
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[6] |
Hosoya M, Shimoda M. The application of diesel oxidation catalysts to heavy duty diesel engines in Japan. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 1996, 10(1-3): 83–97
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[7] |
Maricq M M, Chase R E, Xu N, Laing P M. The effect of the catalytic converter and fuel sulfur level on motor vehicle particulate matter emissions: light duty diesel vehicles. Environmental Science & Technology, 2002, 36(7): 283–289
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[8] |
Shah S D, Cocker D R III, Johnson K C, Lee J M, Soriamo B L, Miller J W. Reduction of particulate matter emissions from diesel backup generators equipped with four different exhaust aftertreatment devices. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 40(14): 5070–5076
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[9] |
Graboski M S, McCormick R L. Combustion of fat and vegetable oil derived fuels in diesel engines. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 1998, 24(2): 125–164
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[10] |
Lapuerta M, Armas O, Rodríguez-Fernández J. Effect of biodiesel fuels on diesel engine emissions. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2008, 34(2): 198–223
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[11] |
Durbin T D, Collins J R, Norbeck J M, Smith M R. Effects of biodiesel, biodiesel blends and a synthetic diesel on emissions from light heavy-duty diesel vehicles. Environmental Science & Technology, 2002, 34(3): 349–355
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[12] |
US Environmenral Protection Agency (EPA). A Comprehensive analysis of biodiesel impacts on exhaust emissions. Draft Technical Report EPA420-P-02–001, 2002
|
[13] |
Lee S W, Herage T, Yong B. Emission reduction potential from the combustion of soy methyl ester fuel blended with petroleum distillate fuel. Fuel, 2004, 83(11-12): 1607–1613
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[14] |
Zhang J, He K, Shi X, Zhao Y. Effect of SME biodiesel blends on PM2.5 emission from a heavy-duty engine. Atmospheric Environment, 2008, 43(15): 2442–2448
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[15] |
Zhang Z H, Cheung C S, Chan T L, Yao C D. Emission reduction from diesel engine using fumigation methanol and diesel oxidation catalyst. Science of the Total Environment, 2009, 407(15): 4497–4505
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[16] |
Vaaraslahti K, Ristimäki J, Virtanen A, Keskinen J, Giechaskiel B, Soll A A. Effect of oxidation catalysts on diesel soot particles. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(15): 4776–4781
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[17] |
Bagley S T, Gratz L, Johnson J H, Mcdonald J F. Effects of an oxidation catalytic converter and a biodiesel fuel on the chemical, mutagenic, and particle size characteristics of emissions from a diesel engine. Environmental Science & Technology, 1998, 32(9): 1183–1191
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[18] |
Tang S, Frank B P, Lanni T, Rideout G, Meyer N, Beregszaszy C. Unregulated emissions from a heavy-duty diesel engine with various fuels and emission control systems. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(14): 5037–5043
CrossRef
Google scholar
|
[19] |
Chow J C, Watson J G, Pritchett L C, Crow D, Lowenthal D H, Merrifield T. Comparison of IMPROVE and NIOSH carbon measurements. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2001, 34(1): 23–34
|
/
〈 | 〉 |