Feedforward control for nitrogen removal in a pilot-scale anaerobic-anoxic-oxic plant for municipal wastewater treatment

Abstract

To improve the efficiency of nitrogen removal with lower energy consumption, the study of feedforward control was carried out on a pilot-scale anaerobic-anoxic-oxic (AAO) plant for the treatment of municipal wastewater. The effluent qualities of the pilot plant under different control strategies were investigated. The results indicated that the change of external recycle was not a suitable approach to regulate the sludge concentration of plug-flow reactors; adjusting the aeration valve and dissolved oxygen set-point according to ammonia load could overcome the impact of influent fluctuation; and the denitrification potential could be estimated based on the transit time of anoxic zone and the relative content of carbon resource entering the anoxic zone. Simple feedforward control strategies for aeration and internal recycle were subsequently proposed and validated. The nitrogen removal was successfully improved in the pilot plant. The effluent total nitrogen had decreased by 29.9% and was steadily controlled below 15 mg·L^-1. Furthermore, approximately 38% of the energy for aeration had been saved.

Keywords

anaerobic-anoxic-oxic (AAO) / feedforward control / municipal wastewater / nitrogen removal

References

[1] Olsson G, Newell B. Wastewater Treatment System: Modeling, Diagnosis and Control. London: IWA Publishing, 1999

[2] Brouwer H, Bloemen M, Klapwijk B, Spanjers H. Feedforward control of nitrification by manipulating the aerobic volume in activated sludge plants. Water Sci Technol, 1998, 38(3): 245-254

[3] Vrecko D, Hvala N, Carlsson B. Feedforward-feedback control of an activated sludge process: a simulation study. Water Sci Technol, 2003, 47(12): 19-26

[4] Zhang P, Yuan M, Wang H. Improvement of nitrogen removal and reduction of operating costs in an activated sludge process with feed forward-cascade control strategy. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 2008, 41(1): 53-58

[5] Ingildsen P, Jeppsson U, Olsson G. Dissolved oxygen controller based on on-line measurements of ammonium combining feed-forward and feedback. Water Sci Technol, 2002, 45(4-5): 453-460

[6] Stare A, Vrecko D, Hvala N, Strmcnik S. Comparison of control strategies for nitrogen removal in an activated sludge process in terms of operating costs: a simulation study. Water Research, 2007, 41(9): 2004-2014

[7] Petersen B, Gemaey K, Henze M, Vanrolleghem P A. Evaluation of an ASM1 model calibration procedure on a municipal-industrial WWTP. Journal of Hydroinformatics, 2002, 4: 15-38

[8] Fall C, Loaiza-Navia J L. Design of a tracer test experience and dynamic calibration of the hydraulic model for a full-scale wastewater treatment plant by use of AQUASIM. Water Environ Res, 2007, 79(8): 893-900

[9] Rivas A, Irizar I, Ayesa E. Model-based optimization of wastewater treatment plants design. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2008, 23(4): 435-450

[10] Barker P S, Dold P L. Denitrification behaviour in biological excess phosphorus removal activated sludge systems. Water Research, 1996, 30(4): 769-780

[11] Kampas P, Parsons S A, Pearce P, Ledoux S, Vale P, Cartmell E, Soares A. An internal carbon source for improving biological nutrient removal. Bioresource Technology, 2009, 100(1): 149-154

[12] Clescerl L S, Greenberg A E, Eaton A D. Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th ed. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, 1998

[13] Westerterp K R, van Swaaij W P M, Beenackers A A C M. Chemical Reactor Design and Operation. New York: Wiley, 1984

[14] Wang X L, Peng Y Z, Ma Y, Wang S Y. Effects of operational variables on nitrogen removal performances and its control in a pre-denitrification plant. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2007, 30(2): 234-241

[15] The IWA task group on mathematical modelling for design and operation of biological wastewater treatment. Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3. London: IWA Publishing, 2000

[16] Samuelsson P, Carlsson B. Control of the aeration volume in an activated sludge process for nitrogen removal. Water Sci Technol, 2002, 45(4-5): 45-52

[17] Shen T, Qiu Y, Shi H. Mathematical simulation of feedforward control for nutrient removal in anaerobic–anoxic–oxic processes. Environmental Engineering Science, 2010, 27(8): 633-641

[18] Yuan Z, Oehmen A, Ingildsen P. Control of nitrate ricirculation flow in predenitrification systems. Water Sci Technol, 2002, 45(4-5): 29-36

[19] Siegrist H, Krebs P, Buhler R, Purtschert I, Rock C, Rufer R. Denitrification in secondary clarifiers. Water Sci Technol, 1995, 31(2): 205-214

[20] Ma Y, Peng Y Z, Wang S Y, Wang X L. Nitrogen removal influence factors in A/O process and decision trees for nitrification/denitrification system. Journal of Environmental Sciences-China, 2004, 16(6): 901-907

[21] Baeza J A, Gabriel D, Lafuente J. Effect of internal recycle on the nitrogen removal efficiency of an anaerobic/anoxic/oxic (A(2)/O) wastewater treatment plant (WWTP). Process Biochemistry, 2004, 39(11): 1615-1624

[22] Chakraborty S, Veeramani H. Effect of HRT and recycle ratio on removal of cyanide, phenol, thiocyanate and ammonia in an anaerobic-anoxic-aerobic continuous system. Process Biochemistry, 2006, 41(1): 96-105

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg