Effects of different sediment fractions on sorption of galaxolide

Lixia JIN, Mengchang HE, Jinghuan ZHANG

PDF(246 KB)
PDF(246 KB)
Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. ›› 2012, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1) : 59-65. DOI: 10.1007/s11783-010-0259-1
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Effects of different sediment fractions on sorption of galaxolide

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Sorption isotherms of galaxolide (HHCB) of different fractions from two sediments with different mineral and organic carbon contents were determined to compare HHCB sorption behavior and contribution to the total sorption. The HHCB sorption isotherms that used the batch equilibration method were studied on different sediments of different fractions. The sorption isotherms of 600°C heating fractions were detailed using the linear model, while the other fractions were nonlinear and fitted well with the Freundlich model. The dissolved organic carbon (DOC) removed, NaOH extracted, and 375°C heating fractions showed more nonlinear sorption than the original sediments, which suggested more heterogeneous sorption sites in these fractions. Compared to the original sediments, the 375°C heating fractions had higher carbon-normalized distribution coefficient (Koc) values, indicating a higher sorption affinity for HHCB. Among the different sediment fractions, the contribution of the 600°C heating fractions to the overall sorption were the lowest (<20%), while the 375°C heating fractions were the highest (up to 85%).

Keywords

galaxolide (HHCB) / sorption / organic carbon / sediment / carbon-normalized distribution coefficient (Koc)

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Lixia JIN, Mengchang HE, Jinghuan ZHANG. Effects of different sediment fractions on sorption of galaxolide. Front Envir Sci Eng, 2012, 6(1): 59‒65 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-010-0259-1

References

[1]
Simonich S L, Federle T W, Eckhoff W S, Rottiers A, Webb S, Sabaliunas D, de Wolf W. Removal of fragrance materials during U.S. and European wastewater treatment. Environmental Science & Technology, 2002, 36(13): 2839–2847
[2]
Peck A M, Linebaugh E K, Hornbuckle K C. Synthetic musk fragrances in Lake Erie and Lake Ontario sediment cores. Environmental Science & Technology, 2006, 40(18): 5629–5635
[3]
Shek W M, Murphy M B, Lam J C, Lam P K. Synthetic polycyclic musks in Hong Kong sewage sludge. Chemosphere, 2008, 71(7): 1241–1250
[4]
Zhang X L, Yao Y, Zeng X Y, Qian G R, Guo Y W, Wu M H, Sheng G Y, Fu J M. Synthetic musks in the aquatic environment and personal care products in Shanghai, China. Chemosphere, 2008, 72(10): 1553–1558
[5]
Ternes T A, Meisenheimer M, McDowell D, Sacher F, Brauch H J, Haist-Gulde B, Preuss G, Wilme U, Zulei-Seibert N. Removal of pharmaceuticals during drinking water treatment. Environmental Science & Technology, 2002, 36(17): 3855–3863
[6]
Gooding M P, Newton T J, Bartsch M R, Hornbuckle K C. Toxicity of synthetic musks to early life stages of the freshwater mussel Lampsilis cardium. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2006, 51(4): 549–558
[7]
Luckenbach T, Epel D. Nitromusk and polycyclic musk compounds as long-term inhibitors of cellular xenobiotic defense systems mediated by multi-drug transporters. Environmental Health Perspectives, 2005, 113(1): 17–24
[8]
Rimkus G G, Wolf M. Polycyclic musk fragrances in human adipose tissue and human milk. Chemosphere, 1996, 33(10): 2033–2043
[9]
Lignell S, Darnerud P O, Aune M, Cnattingius S, Hajslova J, Setkova L, Glynn A. Temporal trends of synthetic musk compounds in mother’s milk and associations with personal use of perfumed products. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(17): 6743–6748
[10]
Pan B, Ning P, Xing B S. Part IV–sorption of hydrophobic organic contaminants. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2008, 15(7): 554–564
[11]
Bonin J L, Simpson M J. Variation in phenanthrene sorption coefficients with soil organic matter fractionation: the result of structure or conformation? Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(1): 153–159
[12]
Zhang J H, Zeng J H, He M C. Effects of temperature and surfactants on naphthalene and phenanthrene sorption by soil. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2009, 21(5): 667–674(in Chinese)
[13]
Zhang J H, He M C, Shi Y H. Comparative sorption of benzo[α]phrene to different humic acids and humin in sediments. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2009, 166(2-3): 802–809
[14]
Luo L, Zhang S Z, Ma Y B. Evaluation of impacts of soil fractions on phenanthrene sorption. Chemosphere, 2008, 72(6): 891–896
[15]
Ran Y, Sun K, Yang Y, Xing B S, Zeng E. Strong sorption of phenanthrene by condensed organic matter in soils and sediments. Environmental Science & Technology, 2007, 41(11): 3952–3958
[16]
Liu J Q, Zhang Y B, Chen H, Zhao Y Z, Quan X. Contribution of black carbon to nonlinearity of sorption and desorption of acetochlor on sediment. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering in China, 2009, 3(1): 69–74
[17]
Huang W L, Schlautman M A, Weber W J. A distributed reactivity model for sorption by soils and sediments. 5. The influence of near-surface characteristics in mineral domains. Environmental Science & Technology, 1996, 30(10): 2993–3000
[18]
Pan B, Ning P, Xing B S. Part V-sorption of pharmaceuticals and personal care products. Environmental science and Pollution Research, 2009, 16(1): 106–116
[19]
Chen D Y, Xie W B, Luo D G, Song G. Characteristics of soil organic matter and sorption of phenanthrene, naphthalene 1,3,5-TCB and o-xylene. Soil and Sediment Contamination, 2009, 18(2): 229–241
[20]
Litz N T, Muller J, Böhmer W. Occurrence of polycyclic musks in sewage sludge and their behaviour in soils and plants–Part 2: Investigation of polycyclic musks in soil and plants. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2007, 7(1): 36–44
[21]
LeBoeuf E J, Weber W J. A distributed reactivity model for sorption by soils and sediments. 8. Sorbent organic domains: discovery of a humic acid glass transition and an argument for a polymer-based model. Environmental Science & Technology, 1997, 31(6): 1697–1702
[22]
Balk F, Ford R A. Environmental risk assessment for the polycyclic musks AHTN and HHCB in the EU-I. Fate and exposure assessment. Toxicology Letters, 1999, 111(1-2): 57–79
[23]
Huang W L, Weber W J. A mechanistic model for soil and sediment sorption-desorption hysteresis. In-situ and On-site Bioremediation, 1997, 4(5): 611–616
[24]
Senesi N, D'Orazio V, Ricca G. Humic acids in the first generation of EUROSOILS. Geoderma, 2003, 116(3-4): 325–344
[25]
Jones A D, Bruland G L, Agrawal S G, Vasudevan D. Factors influencing the sorption of oxytetracycline to soils. Environmental Toxicology Chemistry, 2005, 24(4): 761–770
[26]
Lai K M, Johnson K L, Scrimshaw M D, Lester J N. Binding of waterborne steroid estrogens to solid phases in river and estuarine systems. Environmental Science & Technology, 2000, 34(18): 3890–3894

Acknowledgements

The study was jointly supported by the Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (No. IRT0809), the project of the National Basic Research Program of China (No. 2004CB418502), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2009SD-8)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF(246 KB)

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/