Continuous biohydrogen production from diluted molasses in an anaerobic contact reactor

Abstract

An anaerobic contact reactor (ACR) system comprising a continuous flow stirred tank reactor (CSTR) with settler to decouple the hydraulic retention time (HRT) from solids retention time (SRT) was developed for fermentative hydrogen production from diluted molasses by mixed microbial cultures. The ACR was operated at various volumetric loading rates (VLRs) of 20–44 kgCOD·m^-3·d^-1 with constant HRT of 6 h under mesophilic conditions of 35°C. The SRT was maintained at about 46–50 h in the system. At the initial VLR of 20 kgCOD·m^-3·d^-1, the hydrogen production rate dropped from 22.6 to 1.58 L·d^-1 as the hydrogen was consumed by the hydrogentrophic methanogen. After increasing the VLR to 28 kgCOD·m^-3·d^-1 and discharging the sludge for 6 consecutive times, the hydrogentrophic methanogens were eliminated, and the hydrogen content reached 36.4%. As the VLR was increased to 44 kgCOD·m^-3·d^-1, the hydrogen production rate and hydrogen yield increased to 42.1 L·d^-1 and 1.40 mol H₂·molglucose-consumed^-1, respectively. The results showed that a stable ethanol-type fermentation that favored hydrogen production in the reactor was thus established with the sludge loading rate (SLR) of 2.0–2.5 kgCOD·kgMLVSS^-1·d^-1. It was found that the ethanol increased more than other liquid fermentation products, and the ethanol/acetic acid (mol/mol) ratio increased from 1.27 to 2.45 when the VLR increased from 28 to 44 kgCOD·m^-3·d^-1, whereas the hydrogen composition decreased from 40.4% to 36.4%. The results suggested that the anaerobic contact reactor was a promising bioprocess for fermentative hydrogen production.

Keywords

fermentative hydrogen production / anaerobic contact reactor (ACR) / sludge loading rate (SLR) / butyric acid-type fermentation / ethanol-type fermentation

References

[1] Das D, Veziroglu T N. Hydrogen production by biological processes: a survey of literature. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2001, 26(1): 13-28

[2] Das D, Veziroglu T N. Advances in biological hydrogen production processes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2008, 33(21): 6046-6057

[3] Valdez-Vazquez I, Poggi-Varaldo H M. Hydrogen production by fermentative consortia. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2009, 13(5): 1000-1013

[4] Hawkes F R, Hussy I, Kyazze G, Dinsdale R, Hawkes D L. Continuous dark fermentative hydrogen production by mesophilic microflora: Principles and progress. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(2): 172-184

[5] Ren N Q, Li J Z, Li B K, Wang Y, Liu S R. Biohydrogen production from molasses by anaerobic fermentation with a pilot-scale bioreactor system. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2006, 31(15): 2147-2157

[6] Cheong D Y, Hansen C L, Stevens D K. Production of bio-hydrogen by mesophilic anaerobic fermentation in an acid-phase sequencing batch reactor. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2007, 96(3): 421-432

[7] Chang J S, Lee K S, Lin P J. Biohydrogen production with fixed-bed bioreactors. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2002, 27(11-12): 1167-1174

[8] Zhang Z, Tay J, Show K, Yan R, Liang D, Lee D, Jiang W. Biohydrogen production in a granular activated carbon anaerobic fluidized bed reactor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2007, 32(2): 185-191

[9] Chang F Y, Lin C Y. Biohydrogen production using up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2004, 29(1): 33-39

[10] Fang H H P, Liu H, Zhang T. Bio-hydrogen production from wastewater. Water Science and Technology: Water Supply, 2004, 4(1): 77-85

[11] Lay J J. Modeling and optimization of anaerobic digested sludge converting starch to hydrogen. Biotechnology and Bioengineering,2000, 68(3): 269-278

[12] Y UenoS Haruta, M Ishii, Y Igarashi. Microbial community in anaerobic hydrogen-producing microflora enriched from sludge compost. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology,2001, 57(4): 555-562

[13] Ren N Q, Chua H, Chan S Y, Tsang Y F, Wang Y J, Sin N. Assessing optimal fermentation type for bio-hydrogen production in continuous-flow acidogenic reactors. Bioresource Technology,2007, 98(9): 1774-1780

[14] Wu K J, Chang J S. Batch and continuous fermentative production of hydrogen with anaerobic sludge entrapped in a composite polymeric matrix. Process Biochemistry (Barking, London, England),2007, 42(2): 279-284

[15] Lee K S, Lo Y C, Lin P J, Chang J S. Improving biohydrogen production in a carrier-induced granular sludge bed by altering physical configuration and agitation pattern of the bioreactor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2006, 31(12): 1648-1657

[16] Guo W Q, Ren N Q, Wang X J, Xiang W S, Meng Z H, Ding J, Qu Y Y, Zhang L S. Biohydrogen production from ethanol-type fermentation of molasses in an expanded granular sludge bed (EGSB) reactor. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2008, 33(19): 4981-4988

[17] Hu B, Chen S L. Pretreatment of methanogenic granules for immobilized hydrogen fermentation. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2007, 32(15): 3266-3273

[18] Zhang Z P, Show K Y, Tay J H, Liang D T, Lee D J. Biohydrogen production with anaerobic fluidized bed reactors—a comparison of biofilm-based and granule-based systems. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2008, 33(5): 1559-1564

[19] Oh S E, Iyer P, Bruns M A, Logan B E. Biological hydrogen production using a membrane bioreactor. Biotechnology and Bioengineering,2004, 87(1): 119-127

[20] Kim J O, Kim Y H, Ryu J Y, Song B K, Kim I H, Yeom S H. Immobilization methods for continuous hydrogen gas production biofilm formation versus granulation. Process Biochemistry,2005, 40(3-4): 1331-1337

[21] Lin C N, Wu S Y, Chang J S. Fermentative hydrogen production with a draft tube fluidized bed reactor containing silicone-gel-immobilized anaerobic sludge. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2006, 31(15): 2200-2210

[22] Hamdi M, Garcia J L. Comparison between anaerobic filter and anaerobic contact process for fermented olive mill wastewaters. Bioresource Technology,1991, 38(1): 23-29

[23] Defour D, Derycke D, Liessens J, Pipyn P. Field experience with different systems for biomass accumulation in anaerobic reactor technology. Water Science and Technology,1994, 30(12): 181-191

[24] Hawkes F R, Donnelly T, Anderson G K. Comparative performance of anaerobic digesters operating on ice-cream waste-water. Water Research,1995, 29(2): 525-533

[25] Hafez H, Baghchehsaraee B, Nakhla G, Karamanev D, Margaritis A, EI Naggar H. Comparative assessment of decoupling of biomass and hydraulic retention times in hydrogen production bioreactors. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2009, 34(18): 7603-7611

[26] Hafez H, Nakhla G, Naggar H E. An integrated system for hydrogen and methane production during landfill leachate treatment. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2010, 35(10): 5010-5014

[27] Li J Z, Li B K, Zhu G F, Ren N Q, Bo L X, He J G. Hydrogen production from diluted molasses by anaerobic hydrogen producing bacteria in an anaerobic baffled reactor (ABR). International Journal of Hydrogen Energy,2007, 32(15): 3274-3283

[28] DuBois M, Gilles K A, Hamilton J K, Rebers P A, Smith F. Colormetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Analytical Chemistry, 1956, 28(3): 350-356

[29] APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater.21st ed. Washington DC: American Public Health Accociation. 2005

[30] Ren N Q, Gong M L. Acclimation strategy of a biohydrogen producing population in a continuous-Flow Reactor with Carbohydrate Fermentation. Engineering in Life Sciences,2006, 6(4): 403-409

[31] Li J Z, Zheng G C, He J G, Chang S, Qin Z. Hydrogen-producing capability of anaerobic activated sludge in three types of fermentations in a continuous stirred-tank reactor. Biotechnology Advances, 2009, 27(5): 573-577

[32] Fang H H P, Liu H. Effect of pH on hydrogen production from glucose by a mixed culture. Bioresource Technology, 2002, 82(1): 87-93

[33] Khanal S K, Chen W H, Li L, Sung S. Biological hydrogen production: effects of pH and intermediate products. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2004, 29(11): 1123-1131

[34] Kim I S, Hwang M H, Jang N J, Hyun S H, Lee S T. Effect of low pH on the activity of hydrogen utilizing methanogen in bio-hydrogen process. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2004, 29(11): 1133-1140

[35] Ginkel S V, Sung S. Biohydrogen Production as a function of pH and substrate concentration. Environmental Science & Technology, 2001, 35(24): 4726-4730

[36] Hwang M H, Jang N J, Hyun S H, Kim I S. Anaerobic bio-hydrogen production from ethanol fermentation: the role of pH. Journal of Biotechnology, 2004, 111(3): 297-309

[37] Chou C J, Jenney F E Jr, Adams M W W, Kelly R M. Hydrogenesis in hyperthermophilic microorganisms: implications for biofuels. Metabolic Engineering, 2008, 10(6): 394-404

[38] Vanginkel S W, Logan B. Increased biological hydrogen production with reduced organic loading. Water Research, 2005, 39(16): 3819-3826

[39] Lee H S, Salerno M B, Rittmann B E. Thermodynamic evaluation on H₂ production in glucose fermentation. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(7): 2401-2407

[40] Lee H S, Rittmann B E. Evaluation of metabolism using stoichiometry in fermentative biohydrogen. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2009, 102(3): 749-758

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by the State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology (No. 2010DX06), National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) (No. 2006AA05Z109), and Harbin Science and Technology Bureau (No. 2009RFXXS004).

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg