Optimization of phosphorus removal in uniFed SBR system for domestic wastewater treatment

Abstract

The characteristic of phosphorus removal and appropriate change of the traditional operation modes were investigated in UniFed sequencing batch reactor (SBR) laboratory-scale apparatus (40 L), treating actual domestic wastewater with low ratios of C/N (2.57) and C/P (30.18), providing theoretical basis for actual application of wastewater treatment plant. UniFed SBR system with its unique operation mode had the distinct superiority of phosphorus removal. On this occasion, the effect of volumetric exchange ratio (VER) and the method of influent introduction for phosphorus removal were studied. When the carbon source became the limiting factor to phosphorus release, the higher the VER, the lower the phosphorus concentration in the effluent. Three different influent patterns, including one-time filling, four-time filling, and continuous filling with the same quantity of wastewater could increase the release rate of anaerobic phosphorus from 0.082 to 0.143 mg·P·(L·min)^-1. Appropriate change of the traditional operation modes could optimize the efficiency of phosphorus removal. When the feed/ decant time was extended from 2 h to 4 h, the phosphorous removal efficiency increased from 59.93% to 88.45% without any external carbon source. In the mode of alternation of anoxic-aerobic (A/O) condition, phosphorous removal efficiency increased from 55.07% to 72.27% clearly. The carbon source in the influent can be used adequately, and denitrifying phosphorus removal was carried out in anoxic stage 2 (A2). This mode was optimal for the treatment of actual domestic wastewater with low C/N and C/P ratios.

Keywords

UniFed sequencing batch reactor (SBR) / phosphorus removal / volumetric exchange ratio (VER) / alternation of anoxic-aerobic (A/O) / domestic wastewater

References

[1] Smolders G J F, Vandermeij J, Vanloosdrecht M C M, Heijnen J J. Stoichiometric model of the aerobic metabolism of the biological phosphorus removal process. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 1994 (44): 837–848

[2] Mino T, Van Loosdrecht M C M, Heijnen J J. Microbiology and biochemistry of the enhanced biological phosphate removal process. Water Research, 1998, 32(11): 3193–3207

[3] Keller J, Subramaniam K, Gosswein J, Greenfield P. Nutrient removal from industrial wastewater using single tank sequencing batch reactors. Water Science and Technology, 1997, 35(6): 137–144

[4] Keller J, Watts S, Battye-Smith W, Chong R. Full-scale demonstration of biological nutrient removal in a single tank SBR process. Water Science and Technology, 2001, 43(3): 355–362

[5] Janssen P M. Operating experiences on two full-scale plants, retrofitted for biological phosphorus removal-nutrient removal from wastewaters. Technomic Publishing Company, Pennsylvania, 1994

[6] Schuler A J, Jenkins D. Enhanced biological phosphorus removal from wastewater by biomass with different phosphorus contents, Part I: Experimental results and comparison with metabolic models. Water Environment Research, 2003, 75(6): 485–498

[7] Randall C W, Barnard J L, David H S. Design and Retrofit of Wastewater Treatment Plants for Biological Nutrient Removal. Technomic Publishing Company, Pennsylvania, USA, 1994

[8] Ma Y, Peng Y Z, Wang X L, Wang S Y. Nutrient removal performance of an anaerobic-anoxic-aerobic process as a function of influent C/P ratio. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire), 2005, 80(10): 1118–1124

[9] Zhao C H, Peng Y Z, Qiao Y X, Qi W. Study on personal computer auto-control of UniFed SBR process with air weir. China Water and Wastewater, 2007, 23(3): 14–17 (in Chinese)

[10] APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. Washington D C: American Public Health Association, 1995

[11] Oehmen A, Lemos P C, Carvalho G, Yuan Z G, Kell J, Blackall L L, Reis M A M. Advances in enhanced biological phosphorus removal: From micro to macro scale. Water Research, 2007, 41(11): 2271–2300

[12] Henze M. Capabilities of biological nitrogen removal processes from wastewater. Water Science and Technology, 1991, 23(4-6): 669–679

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Joint Research Fund for Overseas Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 50628808); State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment (HIT) (No. QAK200802); Academic Human Resources Development in Institutions of Higher Learning Under the Jurisdiction of Beijing Municipality (No. PHR20090502)

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg