Ecosystem health assessment of urban rivers and lakes

Abstract

The assessment of the ecosystem health of urban rivers and lakes is the scientific basis for their management and ecological restoration. This study developed a three-level indicator system for its assessment. The results indicated that: Zhonghai and Nanhai are in the state of transition from unhealthy to critical state and all the other lakes are in unhealthy states. Water environmental quality, structure and function of the aquatic ecosystem, and the structure of waterfront areas were the constraints. Nanhai was ranked as poor and the others were all ranked as very poor. However, the ecological environment of Zhonghai and Nanhai were better than the others, the sums of the degree of membership to the healthy state and critical state were all close to 0.6. and the restorations of these lakes were moderate. The sums of the degree of membership to the healthy state and critical state of the other lakes were under 0.3, as it was difficult to restore these lakes. Some suggestions on scientific management and ecological restoration of the six lakes were proposed: $`To control non-point pollution and to improve the water quality of six lakes and the water entering into these lakes; $aTo improve the hydrological conditions of six lakes; $bTo rehabilitate the aquatic ecosystem and waterfront areas.

References

1. Peng J Liao W G Luo H H The environmental reshape of urban water system constructionJouranl of China Institure of Water Resource andHydropower Research 2003 1(4)255259 (in Chinese)
2. Wright J F Armitage P D Furse M T et al.Prediction of invertebrate communities using streammeasurements. Regul. Rivers: Res.Manag 1989 4147155
3. Smith M J Kay W R Edward D H et al.AusRivAS: Using macroinvertebrates to assess ecologicalcondition of rivers in Western AustraliaFreshwater Biology 1999 41269282. doi:10.1046/j.1365‐2427.1999.00430.x
4. Karr J R Definingand measuring river healthFreshwater Biology 1999 41221234. doi:10.1046/j.1365‐2427.1999.00427.x
5. Ladson A R White L J Doolan J A et al.Development and testing of an index of stream conditionfor waterway management in AustraliaFreshwaterBiology 1999 41453468. doi:10.1046/j.1365‐2427.1999.00442.x
6. Tang T Cai Q H Liu J K River ecosystem health and its assessmentChinese Journal of Applied Ecology 2002 13(9)11911194 (in Chinese)
7. Hill B H Herlihy A T Kaufmann P R et al.Assessment of streams of eastern United States usinga periphyton index of biotic integrityEcologicalIndicators 2003 2(4)325338. doi:10.1016/S1470‐160X(02)00062‐6
8. Xu F L Tao S Dawson R W et al.Lake ecosystem health assessment: Indicators andmethodsWater Res 2001 35(13)31573167
9. Hubert G Gerhard T Josef W Ecological integrity assessment of lakes using fish communities–suggestionsof new metrics developed in Tow Autrian Prealpine LakesInternat. Rev. Hydrobiol 2003 88(6)635652
10. Hu H F Xu F L Zhao Z Y et al.An assessment of ecosystem health for Qinghai LakeUrban Environment & Urban Ecological 2003 16(3)7175 (in Chinese)
11. Liu Y Guo H C Dai Y L et al.An assessing approach for lake ecosystem healthActa Scientiae Circumstantiae 2004 24(4)723729 (in Chinese)
12. Cui B S Yang Z F Estabishing an indicator systemfor ecosystem health evaluation on wetlands I. A theoretical framework. Acta Ecologica Sinica 2002 22(7)10051011 (in Chinese)
13. Cui B S Yang Z F Establishing an indicator systemfor ecosystem health evaluation on wetlands II. An application.Acta Ecologica Sinica 2002 22(8)12311239 (in Chinese)
14. Wang Z H Wang K L Xu L F The assessment indicators of wetland ecosystem healthTerritory & Natural Resources Study 2003 46364 (in Chinese)
15. Xu F L Lam K C Zhao Z Y et al.Marine coastal ecosystem health assessment: A casestudy of the Tolo Harbour, Hong Kong, ChinaEcological Modelling 2004 173355370. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2003.07.010
16. Wells P G Assessinghealth of the Bay of Fundy-concepts and frameworkMarine Pollution Bulletin 2003 4610591077. doi:10.1016/S0025‐326X(03)00068‐7
17. Marco R Bianca G Cristina F et al.An integrated approach to the assessment of theenvironment quality of the Tiber river in the urban area of Rome:A mutagenesis assay (micronucleus test) and an analysis of macrobenthiccommunity structureThe Science of the TotalEnvironment 1995 162(2–3)127137
18. Du G S Wang J T Zhang W H The Analysis of Trophic State of Urban Rivers and Lakesin BeijingBeijing Hydrology 2002 62528 (in Chinese)
19. Zhang M F Chen Y S Xu Y L The Water Quality Assessment of instream in Fu ZhouJournal of Fujian Normal University (Natural Science) 2003 19(4)5661 (in Chinese)
20. Liu H J Qu J H Water Quality Evaluation ofthe Three Gorges Reservoir AreaChineseJournal of Environmental Science 2002 23(1)7477 (in Chinese)
21. Zandbergen P A Urbanwatershed ecological risk assessment using GIS: A case study of theBrunette River watershed in British ColumbiaCanda Journal of Hazardous Materials 1998 61(1–3)163173. doi:10.1016/S0304‐3894(98)00120‐4
22. Miltner R J White D Yoder C et al.The biotic integrity of streams in urban and suburbanizinglandscapesLandscape and Urban Planning 2004 69(1)87100. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.032
23. Growns I O Growns J E Ecological effects of flowregulation on croinvertebrate and perihytic diatom assemblages inthe Hawkesbury Nepean RiverAustralia RegulatedRivers: Research & Management 2001 17275293. doi:10.1002/rrr.622
24. Howard R F Robert L W Heather M M Impact of river regulation and climate change on the barredestuary of the Oued Massa Southern MoroccoRegulated Rivers: Research & Management 2001 17235250. doi:10.1002/rrr.613
25. Angela T B Undammingrivers: A review of the ecological impacts of dam removalEnvironmental Management 2001 27(6)08030814. doi:10.1007/s002670010189
26. Tian Y Yang Z F Liu J L Preliminary study on urban eco-environment water requirementsJournal of Environmental Science 2003 23(1)100106 (in Chinese)
27. Zhao Y W Yang Z F Preliminary study on assessmentof urban river ecosystem healthAdvancesin Water Science 2005 16(3)349355 (in Chinese)
28. Zhang C Environmentalassessment tutorialBeijingChina Environmental Science Press 2002 108109 (in Chinese)
29. Wang J Wang J Some problems on the calculationamong chlorophyll concentration, biomass and production of phytoplanktonWuhan Botany Research 1984 2(2)249258 (in Chinese)
30. Fan Y F Liu L Chen X et al.Application of analytic hierarchy process methodto comprehensive evaluation of water environmental safety systemJournal of Hehai University (Natural Sciences) 2004 32(5)512514 (in Chinese)
31. Munawar M Munawar I F Weisse T The significance and future potential of using microbesfor assessing ecosystem health: The Great Lakes exampleJournal of Aquatic Ecosystem Health3(4)295310. doi:10.1007/BF00115288
32. 《quality standard of surface water environment》(GB3838–2002)(in Chinese)
33. Tu Q Y Zhang Y T Yang X Z Approaches to the ecological recovery engineering in lakeShishahai, BeijingJournal of Lakes Sciences 2004 15(6)781786 (in Chinese)
34. Xiao F Liu J L Yang Z F Case study: Calculation of eco-environmental water demandof urban lake for six lakes of BeijingAdvancesin Water Science 2004 15(6)781786 (in Chinese)
35. Wu Z B Qiu D R He F et al.Effects of rehabitation of submerged macrophyteson nutrient level of a entrophic lakeChineseJournal of Applied Ecology 2003 14(8)13511353 (in Chinese)