Relationships between loading rates and nitrogen removal effectiveness in subsurface flow constructed wetlands

Abstract

Nitrogen removal of wetlands under 40 different inflow loadings were studied in the field during 15 months. The removal efficiency of four different sets of beds, namely the reed bed, the Zizania caduciflor bed, the mixing planting bed, and the control bed were studied. The outflow loading and total nitrogen (TN) removal rate of these beds under different inflow loadings and pollution loadings were investigated. The inflow loadings of 4 sub-surface flow systems (SFS) ranged from 400 to 8000 mg·(m²·d)^-1, while outflow loadings were less than 7000 mg·(m²·d)^-1. The results showed that the inflow and outflow loading of TN removal rate in SFS presented an obvious linear relationship. The optical inflow loading to run the system was between 2000 to 4000 mg·(m²·d)^-1. Average removal rate was between 1062 and 2007 mg·(m²·d)^-1. SFS with plant had a better removal rate than the control. TN removal rates of the reed and Zizania caduciflora bed were 63% and 27% higher than the control bed, respectively. The results regarding the TN absorption of plants indicated that the absorption amount was very limited, less than 5% of the total removal. It proved that plants clearly increase TN removal rates by improving the water flow, and increasing the biomass, as well as activities of microorganisms around the roots. The research provided a perspective for understanding the TN removal mechanism and design for SFS.

References

1. Dafner G Eightyears of operating experience with plant covered sewage treatmentworksKorrespondenz Abwasser 1992 39880885(in German)
2. Hammer D A Knight R L Designing constructed wetlandsfor nitrogen removal. Water Sci. Technol. 1994 291527
3. Del Bubba M Lepri L Griffini O Tabani F Nitrogen removalin a pilot-scale subsurface horizontal flow constructed wetlandAnnali di Chimica. 2000 9051324
4. Brix H Useof constructed wetlands in water pollution control: Historical development,present status and future perspectiveWaterSci. Technol. 1994 3020923
5. Börner T Factorsinfluencing the efficiency of constructed wetlandsGerman WAR1992(in German)
6. Mander U Kuusemets V Oovel M Ihme R Sevola P Pieterse A Experimentallyconstructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in EstoniaEnviron. Sci. Health: Part A 2000 351389401
7. Maehlum T Stalnacke P Removal efficiency of threecold climate constructed wetlands treating domestic wastewater: Effectsof temperature, seasons, loading rates and input concentrationWater Sci. Technol. 1999 40273812536
8. Kadlec R H Chemicalphysical and biological cycles in treatment wetlands. Water Sci. Technol. 1999 403744
9. Spieles D J Mitsch W J The effects of season and hydrologicand chemical loading on nitrate retention in constructed wetlands:A comparison of low- and high- nutrient riverine systemEcol. Eng. 2000 147791
10. Thable T S Turnoverof nitrogen compounds in the constructed wetland OthfresenKassel, GermanyUniversity Kassel Press 1984 (in German)
11. Osman R Nitrogenturnover in a wetland influenced by domestic sewageKassel, GermanyUniversity KasselPress 1981 (in German)
12. State Environmental Protection Administration of China. Monitoring and Analyzing Method for Water and Waste Water. 4th ed.BeijingEnvironmentalScience Press 2002 (in Chinese)
13. Kadlec R H Knight R L Treatment WetlandsBoca Raton, USALewis Publishers/CRC Press 1996 893
14. Tanner C C Sukias J P S Upsdell M P Relationships between loading rates and pollutant removalduring maturation of gravel-bed constructed wetlandsEnviron. Qual. 1998b 27448458
15. Zhang R S Li G H Zhou Q Effects of plants on nitrogen and phosphorus removal insubsurface constructed wetlandEnvironmentalScience 2005 26(4)8386(in Chinese)