RESEARCH ARTICLE

Removal of Ni(II) ions from wastewater by micellar enhanced ultrafiltration using mixed surfactants

  • Amar D. Vibhandik ,
  • Kumudini V. Marathe
Expand
  • Department of Chemical Engineering, Institute of Chemical Technology, Mumbai 400019, India

Received date: 05 Jul 2013

Accepted date: 13 Dec 2013

Published date: 05 Mar 2014

Copyright

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

Abstract

Ni(II) ions were removed from aqueous waste using micellar enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) with a mixture of surfactants. The surfactant mixture was the nonionic surfactant Tween 80 (TW80) mixed with the anionic surfactant sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) in different molar ratios ranging from 0.1–1.5. The operational variables of the MEUF process such as pH, applied pressure, surfactant to metal ion ratio and nonionic to ionic surfactant molar ratio (α) were evaluated. Rejection of Ni and TW80 was 99% and 98% respectively whereas that for SDS was 65%. The flux and all resistances (fouling resistance, resistance due to concentration polarization) were measured and calculated for entire range of α respectively. A calculated flux was found to be declined with time, which was mainly attributed to concentration polarization rather than resistance from membrane fouling.

Cite this article

Amar D. Vibhandik , Kumudini V. Marathe . Removal of Ni(II) ions from wastewater by micellar enhanced ultrafiltration using mixed surfactants[J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2014 , 8(1) : 79 -86 . DOI: 10.1007/s11705-014-1407-0

1
Akita S, Nii S, Takahashi K, Takenchi H, Castillo L. Separation of Co(II)/Ni(II) via micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration using organophosphorus acid extractant solubilized by nonionic surfactant. Journal of Membrane Science, 1999, 162(1–2): 111–117

DOI

2
Fillipi B, Christian S, Taylor R, Scamehorn J. A comparative economic analysis of copper removal from water by ligand-modified micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration and by conventional solvent extraction. Journal of Membrane Science, 1998, 145(1): 27–44

DOI

3
Ghezzi L, Monteleone G, Robinson B, Secco F, Tiné R, Venturini M. Metal extraction in water/micelle systems: Complex formation, stripping and recovery of Cd(II). Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2008, 317(1–3): 717–721

DOI

4
Yurlova L, Kryvoruchko A, Kornilovich B. Removal of Ni(II) ions from wastewater by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. Desalination, 2002, 144(1–3): 255–260

DOI

5
Sadaoui Z, Azoug C, Charbit G, Charbit F. Surfactants for separation processes: Enhanced ultrafiltration. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 1998, 124(8): 695–700

DOI

6
Ahmadi S, Huang Y, Batchelor B, Koseoglu S. Binding of heavy metals to derivatives of cholesterol and sodium dodecyl sulfate. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 1995, 121(9): 645–652

DOI

7
Li C, Liu C, Yen W. Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) with mixed surfactants for removing Cu(II) ions. Chemosphere, 2006, 63(2): 353–358

DOI

8
Huang J, Zeng G, Xu K. Removal of cadmium ions from aqueous solution via micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 2005, 15: 184–190

9
Ghosh G, Bhattacharya P. Hexavalent chromium ion removal through micellar enhanced ultrafiltration. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2006, 119(1): 45–53

DOI

10
Xu K, Zeng G, Huang J, Wu J, Fang Y, Huang G, Li J, Xi B, Liu H. Removal of Cd2+ from synthetic wastewater using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration with hollow fiber membrane. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 2007, 294(1–3): 140–146

DOI

11
Jung J, Yang J S, Kim S H, Yang J W. Jung J, Yang J, Kim S, Yang J. Feasibility of micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) for the heavy metal removal in soil washing effluent. Desalination, 2008, 222(1–3): 202–211

DOI

12
Xu Z, Xu H, Zhai X. Treatment of waste streams containing Pb2+ and Cd2+ by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. Journal of Membrane Science and Technology, 2002, 22: 15–21

13
Sadaoui Z, Azoug C, Charbit G, Charbit F. Surfactants for separation processes: Enhanced ultrafiltration. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 1998, 124(7): 695–732

DOI

14
Baek K, Yang J. Competitive bind of anionic metals with cetylpyridinium chloride micelle in micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. Desalination, 2004, 167: 101–110

DOI

15
Gzara L, Dhahbi M. Removal of chromate anions by micellar-enhanced ultra-filtration using cationic surfactants. Desalination, 2001, 137(1–3): 241–250

DOI

16
Juang R, Xu Y, Chen C. Separation and removal of metal ions form dilute solutions using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. Journal of Membrane Science, 2003, 218(1–2): 257–267

DOI

17
Gzara L. Removal of divalent lead cation from aqueous streams using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. Revue des Sciences de l'Eau, 2000, 13(3): 289–304

DOI

18
Back K, Leeb H, Yang J. Micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration for simultaneous removal of ferricyanide and nitrate. Desalination, 2003, 158(1–3): 157–166

DOI

19
Baek K, Kim B K, Cho H, Yang J W. Removal characteristics of anionic metals by micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2003, 99(3): 303–311

DOI

20
Huang J, Zeng G, Fang Y, Qu Y, Li X. Removal of cadmium ions using micellar enhance ultrafiltration with mixed anionic nonionic surfactants. Journal of Membrane Science, 2009, 326(2): 303–309

DOI

21
Lee J, Yang J, Kim H, Baek K, Yang J W. Simultaneous removal of organic and inorganic contaminants by micellar enhanced ultrafiltration with mixed surfactant. Desalination, 2005, 184(1–3): 395–407

DOI

22
Ghosh S, Burman A, De G, Das A. Interfacial and self-aggregation of binary mixtures of anionic and nonionic amphiphiles in aqueous medium. Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2011, 115(38): 11098–11112

DOI

23
Yenphan P, Chanachai A, Jiraratananon R. Experimental study on micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration (MEUF) of aqueous solution and wastewater containing lead ion with mixed surfactants. Desalination, 2010, 253(1–3): 30–37

DOI

24
Aoudia M, Allal N, Djennet A, Toumi L. Dynamic micellar enhanced ultrafiltration: Use of anionic (SDS)-nonionic (NPE) system to remove Cr3+ at low surfactant concentration. Journal of Membrane Science, 2003, 217(1–2): 181–192

DOI

25
Wijmans J, Nakao S, Smolders C. Flux limitation in ultrafiltration: Osmotic pressure model and gel layer model. Journal of Membrane Science, 1984, 20(2): 115–124

DOI

Outlines

/