RESEARCH ARTICLE

Coupling the porous conditional moment closure with the random pore model: applications to gasification and CO2 capture

  • D. N. SAULOV ,
  • C. R. CHODANKA ,
  • M. J. CLEARY ,
  • A. Y. KLIMENKO
Expand
  • School of Mechanical and Mining Engineering, the University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia

Received date: 15 Sep 2011

Accepted date: 20 Nov 2011

Published date: 05 Mar 2012

Copyright

2014 Higher Education Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

Abstract

Gasification of coal or biomass with in situ CO2 capture simultaneously allows production of clean hydrogen at relatively low cost and reduced emission of CO2 into the atmosphere. Clearly, this technology has a great potential for a future carbon constrained economy. Therefore, the development of a comprehensive, physically-based gasifier model is important. The sub-models that describe reactive transport processes in coal particles as well as in particles of CO2 sorbent material are among the key sub-models, which provide a necessary input for an overall gasifier model. Both coal and sorbent are materials that have complicated pore structures. The porous conditional moment closure (PCMC) model proves to be adequate for modeling reactive transport through porous media with fixed pore structure. Consumption of coal in the heterogeneous gasification reaction, however, widens the pores and reduces the surface area available for this reaction. At the same time, formation of a carbonate layer narrows the pores in the sorbent material and reduces the reaction rate of CO2 sorption. In both cases the pore structures are affected. Such changes are not taken into account in the existing PCMC model. In this study, we obtain the parameters of the diffusive tracer distribution based on the pore size distribution given by the widely applied random pore model (RPM), while coupling PCMC with RPM. Such coupling allows taking into account changes in pore structure caused by heterogeneous reactions and thus improves the accuracy of these key sub-models.

Key words: gasification; CO2 capture; PCMC; RPM

Cite this article

D. N. SAULOV , C. R. CHODANKA , M. J. CLEARY , A. Y. KLIMENKO . Coupling the porous conditional moment closure with the random pore model: applications to gasification and CO2 capture[J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2012 , 6(1) : 84 -93 . DOI: 10.1007/s11705-011-1164-2

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Department of Resources, Energy and Tourism under the Australia-China Joint Coordination Group on Clean Coal Technology grant scheme.
1
IEA. World energy outlook, 2009

2
Damm D L, Fedorov A G. Conceptual study of distributed CO2 capture and the sustainable carbon economy. Energy Conversion and Management, 2008, 49(6): 1674–1683

DOI

3
Wall T F. Combustion processes for carbon capture. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2007, 31(1): 31–47

DOI

4
Aaron D, Tsouris C. Separation of CO2 from flue gas: a review. Separation Science and Technology, 2005, 40(1-3): 321–348

DOI

5
Yeh J T, Pennline H W, Resnik K P. Study of CO2 absorption and desorption in a packed column. Energy & Fuels, 2001, 15(2): 274–278

DOI

6
Rochelle G T, Seibert F, Closmann F, Cullinane T, Davis J. CO2 capture by absorption with potassium carbonate. Tech Rep, Texas University, Austin, United States, 2007

7
Versteeg G, van Dijck L, Van Swaaij W. On the kinetics between CO2 and alkanolamines both in aqueous and non-aqueous solutions: an overview. Chemical Engineering Communications, 1996, 144(1): 133–158

DOI

8
Hernandez L O G, Gutierrez D L, Collins-Martinez V, Ortiz A L. Synthesis, characterization and high temperature CO2 capture evaluation of Li2ZrO3-Na2ZrO3 mixtures. Journal of New Materials for Electrochemical Systems, 2008, 11(2): 137–142

9
Meratla Z. Combining cryogenic flue gas emission remediation with a CO2/O2 combustion cycle. Energy Conversion and Management, 1997, 38(9999): S147–S152

DOI

10
da Costa J C D, Lu G Q, Rudolph V. Membrane-based gas separation: Potential energy recovery and greenhouse abatement applications. Developments in chemical engineering and mineral processing, 1997, 5(1-2): 89–100

11
Carapellucci R, Milazzo A. Membrane systems for CO2 capture and their integration with gas turbine plants. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part A, Journal of Power and Energy, 2003, 217(5 A5): 505–517

DOI

12
Bounaceur R, Lape N, Roizard D, Vallieres C, Favre E. Membrane processes for post-combustion carbon dioxide capture: a parametric study. Energy, 2006, 31(14): 2556–2570

DOI

13
Smart S, Lin C X C, Ding L, Thambimuthu K, Diniz da Costa J C. Ceramic membranes for gas processing in coal gasification. Energy and Environmental Sciemce, 2010, 3(3): 268–278

DOI

14
Maroto-Valer M M, Tang Z, Zhang Y. CO2 capture by activated and impregnated anthracites. Fuel Processing Technology, 2005, 86(14-15): 1487–1502

DOI

15
Song C. Global challenges and strategies for control, conversion and utilization of CO2 for sustainable development involving energy, catalysis, adsorption and chemical processing. Catalysis Today, 2006, 115(1-4): 2–32

DOI

16
Mérel J, Clausse M, Meunier F. Carbon dioxide capture by indirect thermal swing adsorption using 13X zeolite. Environment and Progress, 2006, 25(4): 327–333

DOI

17
Zhang J, Webley P A, Xiao P. Effect of process parameters on power requirements of vacuum swing adsorption technology for CO2 capture from flue gas. Energy Conversion and Management, 2008, 49(2): 346–356

DOI

18
An H, Feng B, Su S. CO2 capture by electrothermal swing adsorption with activated carbon fibre materials. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2011, 5(1): 16–25

DOI

19
Feng B, An H, Tan E. Screening of CO2 adsorbing materials for zero emission power generation systems. Energy & Fuels, 2007, 21(2): 426–434

DOI

20
Barker R. Reversibility of the reaction CaCO3 reversible reaction CaO plus CO2. Journal of Applied Chemistry and Biotechnology, 1973, 23(10): 733–742

DOI

21
Abanades J C. The maximum capture efficiency of CO2 using a carbonation/calcination cycle of CaO/CaCO3. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2002, 90(3): 303–306

DOI

22
Abanades J C, Alvarez D. Conversion limits in the reaction of CO2 with lime. Energy & Fuels, 2003, 17(2): 308–315

DOI

23
Feng B, Liu W, Li X, An H. Overcoming the problem of loss-in-capacity of calcium oxide in CO2 capture. Energy & Fuels, 2006, 20(6): 2417–2420

DOI

24
Peirano E, Delloume V, Leckner B. Two- or three-dimensional simulations of turbulent gas-solid flows applied to fluidization. Chemical Engineering Science, 2001, 56(16): 4787–4799

DOI

25
Gao K, Wu J, Wang Y, Zhang D. Bubble dynamics and its effect on the performance of a jet fluidised bed gasifier simulated using CFD. Fuel, 2006, 85(9): 1221–1231

DOI

26
Gräbner M, Ogriseck S, Meyer B. Numerical simulation of coal gasification at circulating fluidised bed conditions. Fuel Processing Technology, 2007, 88(10): 948–958

DOI

27
Yu L, Lu J, Zhang X, Zhang S. Numerical simulation of the bubbling fluidized bed coal gasification by the kinetic theory of granular flow (KTGF). Fuel, 2007, 86(5-6): 722–734

DOI

28
Almuttahar A, Taghipour F. Computational fluid dynamics of high density circulating fluidized bed riser: study of modeling parameters. Powder Technology, 2008, 185(1): 11–23

DOI

29
Hartge E U, Ratschow L, Wischnewski R, Werther J. CFD-simulation of a circulating fluidized bed riser. Particuology, 2009, 7(4): 283–296

DOI

30
Armstrong L M, Gu S, Luo K H. Effects of limestone calcination on the gasification processes in a BFB coal gasifier. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 168(2): 848–860

DOI

31
Zhou W, Zhao C S, Duan L B, Qu C R, Chen X P. Two-dimensional computational fluid dynamics simulation of coal combustion in a circulating fluidized bed combustor. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2011, 166(1): 306–314

DOI

32
Gidaspow D. Multiphase flow and fluidization: continuum and kinetic theory descriptions. London: Academic Press Limited, 1994

33
Klimenko A Y, Abdel-Jawad M M. Conditional methods for continuum reacting flows in porous media. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 2007, 31(2): 2107–2115

DOI

34
Quintard M, Whitaker S. Transport in ordered and disordered porous media. Transport inPorous Media, 1994, 14: 163–177

35
Vladimirov I G, Klimenko A Y. Tracing diffusion in porous media with fractal properties. Multiscale Modeling and Simulation, 2010, 8(4): 1178–1211

DOI

36
Bhatia S K, Perlmutter D D. A random pore model for fluid-solid reactions: I. Isothermal, kinetic control. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1980, 26(3): 379–386

DOI

37
Bhatia S K, Perlmutter D D. A random pore model for fluid-solid reactions: II. Diffusion and transport effects. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1981, 27(2): 247–254

DOI

38
Su J L, Perlmutter D D. Effect of pore structure on particle ignition during exothermic gasification reactions. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1985, 31(1): 157–160

DOI

39
Liu G, Benyon P, Benfell K E, Bryant G W, Tate A G, Boyd R K, Harris D J, Wall T F. The porous structure of bituminous coal chars and its influence on combustion and gasification under chemically controlled Conditions. Fuel, 2000, 79(6): 617–626

DOI

40
Ochoa J, Cassanello M C, Bonelli P R, Cukierman A L. CO2 gasification of Argentinean coal chars: A kinetic characterization. Fuel Processing Technology, 2001, 74(3): 161–176

DOI

41
Kajitani S, Hara S, Matsuda H. Gasification rate analysis of coal char with a pressurized drop tube furnace. Fuel, 2002, 81(5): 539–546

DOI

42
Feng B, Bhatia S K. Variation of the pore structure of coal chars during gasification. Carbon, 2003, 41(3): 507–523

DOI

43
Kajitani S, Suzuki N, Ashizawa M, Hara S. CO2 gasification rate analysis of coal char in entrained flow coal gasifier. Fuel, 2006, 85(2): 163–169

DOI

44
Chodankar C R, Feng B, Ran J, Klimenko A Y. Kinetic study of the gasification of an Australian bituminous coal char in carbon dioxide. Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2010, 5(3): 413–419

DOI

45
Klimenko A Y, Bilger R W. Conditional moment closure for turbulent combustion. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 1999, 25(6): 595–687

DOI

46
Gray W G, Lee P C Y. On the theorems for local volume averaging of multiphase systems. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 1977, 3(4): 333–340

DOI

47
Adler P. In: Fractal Approach to Heterogeneous Chemistry. Anvir D, ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1989

48
Lenormand R. Applications of fractal concepts in petroleum engineering. Physica D. Nonlinear Phenomena, 1989, 38(1-3): 230–234

DOI

49
Barton C C, La Pointe P. R. Fractals in Petroleum Geology and Earth Processes. New York: Plenum Press, 1995

50
Devaud C B, Bilger R W, Liu T. A new method of modeling the conditional scalar dissipation rate. Physics of Fluids, 2004, 16(6): 2004–2111

DOI

51
Bhatia S K, Perlmutter D D. Effect of the product layer on the kinetics of the CO2-lime reaction. AIChE Journal, 1983, 29(1): 79–86

DOI

Outlines

/