RESEARCH ARTICLE

Preparation of polysulfone-based block copolymer ultrafiltration membranes by selective swelling and sacrificing nanofillers

  • Shanshan Zhang 1 ,
  • Jiemei Zhou 1 ,
  • Zhaogen Wang 1 ,
  • Jianzhong Xia , 2,3 ,
  • Yong Wang , 1
Expand
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Materials-Oriented Chemical Engineering, College of Chemical Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
  • 2. Institute for Advanced Study, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
  • 3. Beijing OriginWater Membrane Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 101407, China

Received date: 13 Nov 2020

Accepted date: 08 Jan 2021

Published date: 15 May 2022

Copyright

2021 Higher Education Press

Abstract

Selective swelling of block copolymers of polysulfone-b-poly(ethylene glycol) is an emerging strategy to prepare new types of polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes. Herein, we prepared nanoporous polysulfone-b-poly(ethylene glycol) ultrafiltration membranes by selective swelling and further promoted their porosity and ultrafiltration performances by using CaCO3 nanoparticles as the sacrificial nanofillers. Different contents of CaCO3 nanoparticles were doped into the solution of polysulfone-b-poly(ethylene glycol), and thus obtained suspensions were used to prepare both self-supported and bi-layered composite structures. Selective swelling was performed on the obtained block copolymer structures in the solvent pair of ethanol/acetone, producing nanoporous membranes with poly(ethylene glycol) lined along pore walls. The CaCO3 nanoparticles dispersed in polysulfone-b-poly(ethylene glycol) were subsequently etched away by hydrochloric acid and the spaces initially occupied by CaCO3 provided extra pores to the block copolymer layers. The porosity of the membranes was increased with increasing CaCO3 content up to 41%, but further increase in the CaCO3 content led to partial collapse of the membrane. The sacrificial CaCO3 particles provided extra pores and enhanced the connectivity between adjacent pores. Consequently, the membranes prepared under optimized conditions exhibited up to 80% increase in water permeance with slight decrease in rejection compared to neat membranes without the use of sacrificial CaCO3 particles.

Cite this article

Shanshan Zhang , Jiemei Zhou , Zhaogen Wang , Jianzhong Xia , Yong Wang . Preparation of polysulfone-based block copolymer ultrafiltration membranes by selective swelling and sacrificing nanofillers[J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2022 , 16(5) : 745 -754 . DOI: 10.1007/s11705-021-2038-x

Acknowledgements

Financial support from the National Natural Science Foundations of China (Grant Nos. 21776126 and 21825803) are gratefully acknowledged. We also thank the support from the Program of Excellent Innovation Teams of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions and the Project of Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11705-021-2038-x and is accessible for authorized users.
1
Amanda A, Kulprathipanja A, Toennesen M, Mallapragada S K. Semicrystalline poly(vinyl alcohol) ultrafiltrationmembranes for bioseparations. Journal of Membrane Science, 2000, 176(1): 87–95

DOI

2
Lee A, Elam J W, Darling S B. Membrane materials for water purification: design, development, and application. Environmental Science. Water Research & Technology, 2016, 2(1): 17–42

DOI

3
Castro-Muñoz R, Boczkaj G, Gontarek E, Cassano A, Fíla V. Membrane technologies assisting plant-based and agro-food by-products processing: a comprehensive review. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2020, 95: 219–232

DOI

4
Boulkrinat A, Bouzerara F, Harabi A, Harrouche K, Stelitano S, Russo F, Galiano F, Figoli A. Synthesis and characterization of ultrafiltration ceramic membranes used in the separation of macromolecular proteins. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2020, 40(15): 5967–5973

DOI

5
Premnath S, Agarwal G P. Single stage ultrafiltration for enhanced reverse selectivity in a binary protein system. Separation Science and Technology, 2017, 52(13): 2161–2172

DOI

6
Park J Y, Acar M H, Akthakul A, Kuhlman W, Mayes A M. Polysulfone-graft-poly(ethylene glycol) graft copolymers for surface modification of polysulfone membranes. Biomaterials, 2006, 27(6): 856–865

DOI

7
Yang Y N, Zhang H X, Wang P, Zheng Q Z, Li J. The influence of nano-sized TiO2 fillers on the morphologies and properties of PSF UF membrane. Journal of Membrane Science, 2007, 288(1-2): 231–238

DOI

8
Zodrow K, Brunet L, Mahendra S, Li D, Zhang A, Li Q L, Alvarez P J J. Polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes impregnated with silver nanoparticles show improved biofouling resistance and virus removal. Water Research, 2009, 43(3): 715–723

DOI

9
Rana D, Matsuura T. Surface modifications for antifouling membranes. Chemical Reviews, 2010, 110(4): 2448–2471

DOI

10
Sheldon J M, Reed I M, Hawes C R. The fine-structure of ultrafiltration membranes. 2. Protein fouled membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 1991, 62(1): 87–102

DOI

11
Mauter M S, Wang Y, Okemgbo K C, Chinedum O O, Giannelis E P, Elimelech M. Antifouling ultrafiltration membranes via post-fabrication grafting of biocidal nanomaterials. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2011, 3(8): 2861–2868

DOI

12
Chen Y Q, Wei M J, Wang Y. Upgrading polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes by blending with amphiphilic block copolymers: beyond surface segregation. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 505: 53–60

DOI

13
Wang N, Wang T, Hu Y X. Tailoring membrane surface properties and ultrafiltration performances via the self-assembly of polyethylene glycol-block-polysulfone-block-polyethylene glycol block copolymer upon thermal and solvent annealing. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 2017, 9(36): 31018–31030

DOI

14
Wang Z G, Yao X P, Wang Y. Swelling-induced mesoporous block copolymer membranes with intrinsically active surfaces for size-selective separation. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2012, 22(38): 20542–20548

DOI

15
Guo L M, Wang Z G, Wang Y. Selective swelling of block copolymers for porous nanostructures. World Scientific Reference of Hybrid Materials, 2018, 1(15): 45–118

16
Zhao W, Su Y L, Li C, Shi Q, Ning X, Jiang Z Y. Fabrication of antifouling polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes using Pluronic F127 as both surface modifier and pore-forming agent. Journal of Membrane Science, 2008, 318(1-2): 405–412

DOI

17
Wang S F, Feng J Y, Xie Y, Tian Z Z, Peng D D, Wu H, Jiang Z Y. Constructing asymmetric membranes via surface segregation for efficient carbon capture. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 500: 25–32

DOI

18
Zhao Y F, Zhang P B, Sun J, Liu C J, Zhu L P, Xu Y Y. Electrolyte-responsive polyethersulfone membranes with zwitterionic polyethersulfone-based copolymers as additive. Journal of Membrane Science, 2016, 510: 306–313

DOI

19
Hancock L F, Fagan S M, Ziolo M S. Hydrophilic, semipermeable membranes fabricated with poly(ethylene oxide)-polysulfone block copolymer. Biomaterials, 2000, 21(7): 725–733

DOI

20
Du R K, Gao B J, Li Y B. Hydrophilic polysulfone film prepared from polyethylene glycol monomethylether via coupling graft. Applied Surface Science, 2013, 274: 288–294

DOI

21
Wang Y. Nondestructive creation of ordered nanopores by selective swelling of block copolymers: toward homoporous membranes. Accounts of Chemical Research, 2016, 49(7): 1401–1408

DOI

22
Yan N N, Wang Y. Selective swelling induced pore generation of amphiphilic block copolymers: the role of swelling agents. Journal of Polymer Science. Part B, Polymer Physics, 2016, 54(9): 926–933

DOI

23
Wang Y, Li F B. An emerging pore-making strategy: confined swelling-induced pore generation in block copolymer materials. Advanced Materials, 2011, 23(19): 2134–2148

DOI

24
Shar J A, Obey T M, Cosgrove T. Adsorption studies of polyethers. Part 1. Adsorption onto hydrophobic surfaces. Colloids and Surfaces. A, Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 1998, 136(1-2): 21–33

DOI

25
Zhou J M, Wang Y. Selective swelling of block copolymers: an upscalable greener process to ultrafiltration membranes? Macromolecules, 2020, 53(1): 5–17

DOI

26
Yang H, Zhou J M, Wang Z G, Shi X S, Wang Y. Selective swelling of polysulfone/poly(ethylene glycol) block copolymer towards fouling-resistant ultrafiltration membranes. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2020, 28(1): 98–103

DOI

27
Arthanareeswaran G, Sriyamuna Devi T K, Raajenthiren M. Effect of silica particles on cellulose acetate blend ultrafiltration membranes: Part I. Separation and Purification Technology, 2008, 64(1): 38–47

DOI

28
Emadzadeh D, Lau W J, Matsuura T, Ismail A F, Rahbari-Sisakht M. Synthesis and characterization of thin film nanocomposite forward osmosis membrane with hydrophilic nanocomposite support to reduce internal concentration polarization. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014, 449: 74–85

DOI

29
Emadzadeh D, Lau W J, Matsuura T, Rahbari-Sisakht M, Ismail A F. A novel thin film composite forward osmosis membrane prepared from PSf-TiO2 nanocomposite substrate for water desalination. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2014, 237: 70–80

DOI

30
Ma N, Wei J, Qi S, Zhao Y, Gao Y B, Tang C Y Y. Nanocomposite substrates for controlling internal concentration polarization in forward osmosis membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 441: 54–62

DOI

31
Lai L L, Shao J, Ge Q Q, Wang Z B, Yan Y S. The preparation of zeolite NaA membranes on the inner surface of hollow fiber supports. Journal of Membrane Science, 2012, 409–410: 318–328

DOI

32
Vilakati G D, Wong M C Y, Hoek E M V, Mamba B B. Relating thin film composite membrane performance to support membrane morphology fabricated using lignin additive. Journal of Membrane Science, 2014, 469: 216–224

DOI

33
Deng C, Zhang Q G, Han G L, Gong Y, Zhu A M, Liu Q L. Ultrathin self-assembled anionic polymer membranes for superfast size-selective separation. Nanoscale, 2013, 5(22): 11028–11034

DOI

34
Liu H Y, Liu L L, Yang C L, Li Z H, Xiao Q Z, Lei G T, Ding Y H. A hard-template process to prepare three-dimensionally macroporous polymer electrolyte for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochimica Acta, 2014, 121: 328–336

DOI

35
Uchida E, Uyama Y, Ikada Y. Zeta potential of polycation layers grafted onto a film surface. Langmuir, 1994, 10(4): 1193–1198

DOI

36
Wang Z G, Liu R, Yang H, Wang Y. Nanoporous polysulfones with in situ PEGylated surfaces by a simple swelling strategy using paired solvents. Chemical Communications, 2017, 53(65): 9105–9108

DOI

37
Darling S B. Directing the self-assembly of block copolymers. Progress in Polymer Science, 2007, 32(10): 1152–1204

DOI

38
Abetz V, Simon P F W. Phase behaviour and morphologies of block copolymers. Advances in Polymer Science, 2005, 189: 125–212

DOI

39
Aimar P, Meireles M, Sanchez V. A contribution to the translation of retention curves into pore size distributions for sieving membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 1990, 54(3): 321–338

DOI

40
Calvo J I, Peinador R I, Prádanos P, Palacio L, Bottino A, Capannelli G, Hernández A. Liquid–liquid displacement porometry to estimate the molecular weight cut-off of ultrafiltration membranes. Desalination, 2011, 268(1-3): 174–181

DOI

Outlines

/