RESEARCH ARTICLE

Separation of n-heptane/isobutanol via eco-efficient vapor recompression-assisted distillation: process optimization and control strategy

  • Wei Hou 1 ,
  • Qingjun Zhang 1 ,
  • Aiwu Zeng , 1,2
Expand
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300350, China
  • 2. Chemical Engineering Research Center, Collaborative Innovative Center of Chemical Science and Engineering, Tianjin 300072, China

Received date: 06 Aug 2020

Accepted date: 20 Sep 2020

Published date: 15 Oct 2021

Copyright

2021 Higher Education Press

Abstract

In this study, vapor recompression and heat integration assisted distillation arrangements with either the low or high pressure in the reflux drum are proposed to reduce and/or eliminate the application of the costly refrigerant for the separation of n-heptane and isobutanol mixture. The high-pressure arrangement with vapor recompression and heat integration is the most attractive among these four intensified configurations since it can reduce total annual cost by 18.10%, CO2 emissions by 75.01% based on natural gas (78.78% based on heavy oil fuel), and second-law efficiency by 61.20% compared to a conventional refrigerated distillation system. Furthermore, exergy destruction in each component is calculated for the heat integration configurations and is shown in pie diagrams. The results demonstrate that the high-pressure configuration presents unique advantages in terms of thermodynamic efficiency compared to the low-pressure case. In addition, dynamic control investigation is performed for the economically efficient arrangement and good product compositions are well controlled through a dual-point temperature control strategy with almost negligible product offsets and quick process responses when addressing 20% step changes in production rate and feed composition. Note that there are no composition measurement loops in our developed control schemes.

Cite this article

Wei Hou , Qingjun Zhang , Aiwu Zeng . Separation of n-heptane/isobutanol via eco-efficient vapor recompression-assisted distillation: process optimization and control strategy[J]. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2021 , 15(5) : 1169 -1184 . DOI: 10.1007/s11705-020-2018-6

Electronic Supplementary Material

Supplementary material is available in the online version of this article at https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-020-2018-6 and is accessible for authorized users.
1
Hu E, Gao Z, Liu Y, Yin G, Huang Z. Experimental and modeling study on ignition delay times of dimethoxy methane/n-heptane blends. Fuel, 2017, 189: 350–357

2
Danon R, Alhseinat E, Peters C, Banat F. Solubility of heptane in aqueous solutions of methyldiethanolamine (MDEA). Fluid Phase Equilibria, 2016, 415: 18–24

3
Yusoff M N A M, Zulkifli N W M, Masjuki H H, Harith M H, Syahir A Z, Khuong L S, Zaharin M S M, Alabdulkarem A. Comparative assessment of ethanol and isobutanol addition in gasoline on engine performance and exhaust emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 190: 483–495

4
Magee W L. Method for preparation of alkyl vanadates. US Patent, 4351775, 1982-09-28

5
Wang Y, Zhang Z, Xu D, Liu W, Zhu Z. Design and control of pressure-swing distillation for azeotropes with different types of boiling behavior at different pressures. Journal of Process Control, 2016, 42: 59–76

6
Zhang Q, Shi P, Hou W, Yang S, Zeng A, Ma Y, Yuan X. Dynamic control analysis of an eco-efficient side-stream extractive distillation configuration. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 239: 116525

7
Feng Z, Shen W, Rangaiah G P, Dong L. Design and control of vapor recompression assisted extractive distillation for separating n-hexane and ethyl acetate. Separation and Purification Technology, 2020, 240: 116655

8
Wang Y, Liang S, Bu G, Liu W, Zhang Z, Zhu Z. Effect of solvent flow rates on controllability of extractive distillation for separating binary azeotropic mixture. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2015, 54(51): 12908–12919

9
Cui C, Liu S, Sun J. Optimal selection of operating pressure for distillation columns. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2018, 137: 291–307

10
Risco A, Plesu V, Heydenreich J A, Bonet J, Bonet-Ruiz A E, Calvet A, Iancu P, Llorens J. Pressure selection for non-reactive and reactive pressure-swing distillation. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, 2019, 135: 9–21

11
You X, Rodriguez-Donis I, Gerbaud V. Low pressure design for reducing energy cost of extractive distillation for separating diisopropyl ether and isopropyl alcohol. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2016, 109: 540–552

12
Luyben W L. Distillation column pressure selection. Separation and Purification Technology, 2016, 168: 62–67

13
Cui C, Sun J. Rigorous design and simultaneous optimization of extractive distillation systems considering the effect of column pressures. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification, 2019, 139: 68–77

14
Wang Y, Qi P, Yang X, Zhu Z, Gao J, Zhang F. Exploration of a heat-integrated pressure-swing distillation process with a varied-diameter column for binary azeotrope separation. Chemical Engineering Communications, 2019, 206(12): 1689–1705

15
Luyben W L. Design and control comparison of alternative separation methods for n-heptane/isobutanol. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 2017, 40(10): 1895–1906

16
Feng Z, Shen W, Rangaiah G P, Lv L, Dong L. Process development, assessment, and control of reactive dividing-wall column with vapor recompression for producing n-propyl acetate. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2018, 58(1): 276–295

17
Li Q, Feng Z, Rangaiah G P, Dong L. Process optimization of heat-integrated extractive dividing-wall columns for energy-saving separation of CO2 and hydrocarbons. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2020, 59(23): 11000–11011

18
Leo M B, Dutta A, Farooq S. Process synthesis and optimization of heat pump assisted distillation for ethylene-ethane separation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2018, 57(34): 11747–11756

19
Luyben W L. High-pressure versus low-pressure auxiliary condensers in distillation vapor recompression. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2019, 125: 427–433

20
Pleşu V, Bonet Ruiz A E, Bonet J, Llorens J. Simple equation for suitability of heat pump sse in distillation. Computer-Aided Chemical Engineering, 2014, 33: 1327–1332

21
Douglas J M. Conceptual design of chemical processes. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1988, 289–315

22
Gadalla M A, Olujic Z, Jansens P J, Jobson M, Smith R. Reducing CO2 emissions and energy consumption of heat-integrated distillation systems. Environmental Science & Technology, 2005, 39(17): 6860–6870

23
Waheed M A, Oni A O, Adejuyigbe S B, Adewumi B A, Fadare D A. Performance enhancement of vapor recompression heat pump. Applied Energy, 2014, 114: 69–79

24
Seader J D, Henley E J, Roper D K. Separation Process Principles. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2010, 258–286

25
Zhang Q, Liu M, Zeng A. Performance enhancement of pressure-swing distillation process by the combined use of vapor recompression and thermal integration. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2019, 120: 30–45

26
Zhang Q, Yang S, Shi P, Hou W, Zeng A, Ma Y, Yuan X. Economically and thermodynamically efficient heat pump-assisted side-stream pressure-swing distillation arrangement for separating a maximum-boiling azeotrope. Applied Thermal Engineering, 2020, 173: 115228

27
Shi P, Zhang Q, Zeng A, Ma Y, Yuan X. Eco-efficient vapor recompression-assisted pressure-swing distillation process for the separation of a maximum-boiling azeotrope. Energy, 2020, 196: 117095

28
Yang S, Zhang Q, Ma Y, Yuan X, Zeng A. Eco-efficient self-heat recuperative vapor recompression-assisted side-stream pressure-swing distillation arrangement for separating a minimum-boiling azeotrope. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2020, 59(29): 13190–13203

29
Luyben W L. Distillation Design and Control Using AspenTM Simulation. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 2013, 145–184

Outlines

/