An efficient technique for improving methanol yield using dual CO₂ feeds and dry methane reforming

Abstract

Steam methane reforming (SMR)-based methanol synthesis plants utilizing a single CO₂ feed represent one of the predominant technologies for improving methanol yield and CO₂ utilization. However, SMR alone cannot achieve full CO₂ utilization, and a high water content accumulates if CO₂ is only fed into the methanol reactor. In this study, a process integrating SMR with dry methane reforming to improve the conversion of both methane and CO₂ is proposed. We also propose an innovative methanol production approach in which captured CO₂ is introduced into both the SMR process and the recycle gas of the methanol synthesis loop. This dual CO₂ feed approach aims to optimize the stoichiometric ratio of the reactants. Comparative evaluations are carried out from a techno-economic point of view, and the proposed process is demonstrated to be more efficient in terms of both methanol productivity and CO₂ utilization than the existing stand-alone natural gas-based methanol process.

Key words： methanol synthesis; CO₂ utilization; dry methane reforming; steam methane reforming; process design

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 21878028, 21606026) and the Chongqing Social Livelihood Technological Innovation and Application Demonstration (No. CSTC2018JSCX-MSYBXX0336).

References

1 Riaz A, Zahedi G, Klemeš J J. A review of cleaner production methods for the manufacture of methanol. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2013, 57(20): 19–37

2 Verhelst S, Turner J W, Sileghem L, Vancoillie J. Methanol as a fuel for internal combustion engines. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2019, 70: 43–88

3 Schaefer M, Behrendt F, Hammer T. Evaluation of strategies for the subsequent use of CO₂. Frontiers of Chemical Engineering in China, 2010, 4(2): 172–183

4 Castellanos-Beltran I J, Assima G P, Lavoie J M. Effect of temperature in the conversion of methanol to olefins (MTO) using an extruded SAPO-34 catalyst. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2018, 12(2): 226–238

5 Song B, Li Y, Cao G, Sun Z, Han X. The effect of doping and steam treatment on the catalytic activities of nano-scale H-ZSM-5 in the methanol to gasoline reaction. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2017, 11(4): 564–574

6 Biedermann P, Grube T, Höhlein B. Methanol as an energy carrier. Jülich: Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 2006, 14–15

7 Ferdan T, Pavlas M, Nevrlý V, Šomplák R, Stehlík P. Greenhouse gas emissions from thermal treatment of non-recyclable municipal waste. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2018, 12(4): 815–831

8 Varbanov P S, Walmsley T G, Fan Y V, Klemeš J J, Perry S J. Spatial targeting evaluation of energy and environmental performance of waste-to-energy processing. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2018, 12(4): 731–744

9 De Guido G, Compagnoni M, Pellegrini L A, Rossetti I. Mature versus emerging technologies for CO₂ capture in power plants: Key open issues in post-combustion amine scrubbing and in chemical looping combustion. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2018, 12(2): 315–325

10 Milani D, Khalilpour R, Zahedi G, Abbas A. A model-based analysis of CO₂ utilization in methanol synthesis plant. Journal of CO₂ Utilization, 2015, 10(24): 12–22

11 Cañete B, Brignole N B, Gigola C E. Methanol production from high CO₂ content natural gas. In: Computer Aided Chemical Engineering. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2018, 151–156

12 Liu X, Bai S, Zhuang H, Yan Z. Preparation of Cu/ZrO₂ catalysts for methanol synthesis from CO₂/H₂. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2012, 6(1): 47–52

13 Pichas C, Pomonis P, Petrakis D, Ladavos A. Kinetic study of the catalytic dry reforming of CH₄ with CO₂ over La_2-xSr_xNiO₄ perovskite-type oxides. Applied Catalysis A, General, 2010, 386(1-2): 116–123

14 Li X, Ai J, Li W, Li D. Ni-Co bimetallic catalyst for CH₄ reforming with CO₂. Frontiers of Chemical Engineering in China, 2010, 4(4): 476–480

15 Stolze B, Titus J, Schunk S A, Milanov A, Schwab E, Gläser R. Stability of Ni/SiO₂-ZrO₂ catalysts towards steaming and coking in the dry reforming of methane with carbon dioxide. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2016, 10(2): 281–293

16 Zhang W, Zhang Y. The catalytic effect of both oxygen-bearing functional group and ash in carbonaceous catalyst on CH₄-CO₂ reforming. Frontiers of Chemical Engineering in China, 2010, 4(2): 147–152

17 Verykios X E. Catalytic dry reforming of natural gas for the production of chemicals and hydrogen. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2003, 28(10): 1045–1063

18 Aasberg-Petersen K, Dybkjær I, Ovesen C, Schjødt N, Sehested J, Thomsen S. Natural gas to synthesis gas-catalysts and catalytic processes. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2011, 3(2): 423–459

19 Aramouni N A K, Touma J G, Tarboush B A, Zeaiter J, Ahmad M N. Catalyst design for dry reforming of methane: Analysis review. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 82: 2570–2585

20 Ryi S K, Lee S W, Park J W, Oh D K, Park J S, Kim S S. Combined steam and CO₂ reforming of methane using catalytic nickel membrane for gas to liquid (GTL) process. Catalysis Today, 2014, 236: 49–56

21 Choudhary V R, Mondal K C. CO₂ reforming of methane combined with steam reforming or partial oxidation of methane to syngas over NdCoO₃ perovskite-type mixed metal-oxide catalyst. Applied Energy, 2006, 83(9): 1024–1032

22 Tomishige K, Himeno Y, Matsuo Y, Yoshinaga Y, Fujimoto K. Catalytic performance and carbon deposition behavior of a NiO-MgO solid solution in methane reforming with carbon dioxide under pressurized conditions. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2000, 39(6): 1891–1897

23 Olah G A, Goeppert A, Czaun M, Prakash G S. Bi-reforming of methane from any source with steam and carbon dioxide exclusively to metgas (CO–2H₂) for methanol and hydrocarbon synthesis. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2013, 135(2): 648–650

24 Soria M, Mateos-Pedrero C, Guerrero-Ruiz A, Rodríguez-Ramos I. Thermodynamic and experimental study of combined dry and steam reforming of methane on Ru/ZrO₂-La₂O₃ catalyst at low temperature. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2011, 36(23): 15212–15220

25 Gangadharan P, Kanchi K C, Lou H H. Evaluation of the economic and environmental impact of combining dry reforming with steam reforming of methane. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2012, 90(11): 1956–1968

26 Baltrusaitis J, Luyben W L. Methane conversion to syngas for gas-to-liquids (GTL): Is sustainable CO₂ reuse via dry methane reforming (DMR) cost competitive with SMR and ATR processes? ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2015, 3(9): 2100–2111

27 Wu W, Felicia W, Yang H T. Optimization of syngas production systems subject to almost net-zero CO₂ emission. In: International Symposium on Advanced Control of Industrial Processes. Hiroshima: ADCONIP, 2014, 174–178

28 Cañete B, Gigola C E, Brignole N B. Synthesis gas processes for methanol production via CH₄ reforming with CO₂, H₂O, and O₂. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2014, 53(17): 7103–7112

29 Abashar M. Coupling of steam and dry reforming of methane in catalytic fluidized bed membrane reactors. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2004, 29(8): 799–808

30 Avetisov A K, Rostrup-Nielsen J R, Kuchaev V L, Bak Hansen J H, Zyskin A G, Shapatina E N. Steady-state kinetics and mechanism of methane reforming with steam and carbon dioxide over Ni catalyst. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A Chemical, 2010, 315(2): 155–162

31 Luu M T, Milani D, Bahadori A, Abbas A.A comparative study of CO₂ utilization in methanol synthesis with various syngas production technologies. Journal of CO₂ Utilization, 2015, 12: 62–76

32 Xu J, Froment G F. Methane steam reforming, methanation and water-gas shift: I. Intrinsic kinetics. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 1989, 35(1): 88–96

33 Wu W, Yang H T, Hwang J J. Dynamic control of a stand-alone syngas production system with near-zero CO₂ emissions. Energy Conversion and Management, 2015, 89: 24–33

34 Choudhary V, Uphade B, Mamman A. Simultaneous steam and CO₂ reforming of methane to syngas over NiO/MgO/SA-5205 in presence and absence of oxygen. Applied Catalysis A, General, 1998, 168(1): 33–46

35 Huang W, Yu L, Li W, Ma Z. Synthesis of methanol and ethanol over CuZnAl slurry catalyst prepared by complete liquid-phase technology. Frontiers of Chemical Engineering in China, 2010, 4(4): 472–475

36 Fan H, Zheng H, Li Z. Preparation of Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalyst under microwave irradiation for slurry methanol synthesis. Frontiers of Chemical Engineering in China, 2010, 4(4): 445–451

37 Løvik I. Modelling, estimation and optimization of the methanol synthesis with catalyst deactivation. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Trondheim: Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2001, 127–128

38 Graaf G, Sijtsema P, Stamhuis E, Joosten G. On chemical equilibria in methanol synthesis. Chemical Engineering Science, 1990, 45(3): 769–770

39 Bussche K V, Froment G. A steady-state kinetic model for methanol synthesis and the water gas shift reaction on a commercial Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ catalyst. Journal of Catalysis, 1996, 161(1): 1–10

40 Sahibzada M, Metcalfe I, Chadwick D. Methanol synthesis from CO/CO₂/H₂ over Cu/ZnO/Al₂O₃ at differential and finite conversions. Journal of Catalysis, 1998, 174(2): 111–118

41 Mignard D, Pritchard C. On the use of electrolytic hydrogen from variable renewable energies for the enhanced conversion of biomass to fuels. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2008, 86(5): 473–487

42 Dincer I, Rosen M A. Exergy: Energy, Environment and Sustainable Development. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2013, 32–33

43 Bellotti D, Rivarolo M, Magistri L. Economic feasibility of methanol synthesis as a method for CO₂ reduction and energy storage. Energy Procedia, 2019, 158: 4721–4728

44 Yang A, Shen W, Wei S A, Dong L C, Li J, Gerbaud V. Design and control of pressure-swing distillation for separating ternary systems with three binary minimum azeotropes. AIChE Journal. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, 2019, 65(4): 1281–1293